56 Democrats support the passage of a new border measure in the House
House Democrats Join Republicans in Passing Border Security Bill
In a surprising display of bipartisanship, dozens of House Democrats joined Republicans on Tuesday to pass a bill aimed at strengthening border security. The legislation, which focuses on imposing new penalties for high-speed vehicle chases near the border, received a majority vote of 271-154.
The House clerk’s tally revealed that 215 Republicans and 56 Democrats voted in favor of the bill, while 154 Democrats and no Republicans opposed it. This bipartisan support was celebrated by Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ), who introduced the Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act in honor of a Border Patrol agent killed in an ATV crash while pursuing a group of illegal immigrants in Texas.
Rep. Greg Stanton (D-AZ) also expressed his support for the bill, emphasizing the need for strong federal penalties to combat the dangerous high-speed chases conducted by smugglers along the border. However, not all Democrats were in favor of the legislation. Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) criticized the bill, calling it a partisan messaging tactic that unfairly targets immigrants.
Meanwhile, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced a companion bill in the Senate, highlighting the support of the National Border Patrol Council and other law enforcement groups for this legislation.
Democrats Break Ranks to Support Border Security
Interestingly, some of the Democrats who backed the House bill were among the 14 who recently voted to denounce the Biden administration’s “open-borders policies.” This further demonstrates the complexity and diversity of opinions within the Democratic party on immigration issues.
The passage of the Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act coincided with a House committee’s consideration of impeachment articles against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his handling of the border crisis. Additionally, Senate negotiators were working on a bipartisan deal that combines aid for U.S. allies with border security reforms.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) praised the passage of the bill, emphasizing the House’s commitment to supporting law enforcement officers working to secure the border.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
What are the concerns raised by opponents of the bill, particularly Democrats, and why do they argue for alternative approaches to address the issue of high-speed vehicle chases near the border
, a Republican from Texas, who called it a “historic moment” for Congress.
The bill, known as the Border Security for All Act, was introduced by Rep. Carlos Gonzalez, a Democrat from Texas, and Rep. Blake Moore, a Republican from Utah. The legislation aims to address the rising number of high-speed vehicle chases near the border, which pose a risk to both law enforcement officers and bystanders.
Under the new law, individuals who engage in a high-speed vehicle chase near the border and recklessly endanger others could face up to five years in prison and fines of up to $10,000. The bill also includes provisions for enhancing cooperation between federal law enforcement agencies and local police departments in border regions.
The passing of this bill represents a rare show of unity between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of border security. In recent years, discussions on immigration and border control have often been marked by partisan division and gridlock. However, the alarming rise in high-speed vehicle chases near the border has been a concern for lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to protect both law enforcement officers and the public. They argue that high-speed chases pose a significant threat to public safety, and stricter penalties are needed to deter individuals from engaging in these dangerous activities. They also stress the importance of cooperation between federal and local law enforcement agencies to effectively address this problem.
Opponents of the bill, mainly Democrats who voted against it, argue that it is unnecessary and could lead to racial profiling and unjust targeting of certain communities. They express concerns that the legislation could be used to disproportionately target individuals from marginalized communities, including immigrants and people of color. They argue that alternative approaches, such as community policing and investment in social programs, should be prioritized instead.
Despite the concerns raised by some Democrats, the bipartisan support for the bill highlights the shared commitment to border security and public safety. It demonstrates that even on deeply divisive issues, lawmakers can find common ground and work together to address pressing concerns.
The passing of the Border Security for All Act by the House is just the first step in the legislative process. The bill will now move to the Senate, where it will face further debate and scrutiny. It remains to be seen whether the bipartisan support seen in the House will be mirrored in the Senate, but this initial success marks a promising start.
In a time marked by political polarization and gridlock, the passing of this border security bill serves as a reminder that collaboration and compromise are still possible. It underscores the importance of finding common ground and prioritizing the safety and security of the American people. While there are undoubtedly challenges ahead, this bipartisan effort gives hope that progress can be made on even the most contentious issues.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...