Get ready for the ultimate bombshell! The IRS whistleblower is about to expose the Biden family’s shady dealings with the DOJ. Here are six reasons why this explosive revelation will rock the political world.
bombshell has sent shockwaves through Washington D.C. An IRS agent has come forward with explosive allegations that the FBI improperly blocked parts of the Hunter Biden investigation and that Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys blocked an indictment against the president’s son on tax charges. This whistleblower is not to be taken lightly, and here are six reasons why:
1. Whistleblower Has Corroborating Evidence
The whistleblower’s attorney has claimed that his client can identify contemporaneous witnesses to corroborate his claims of political interference. This means that there is evidence to back up the allegations, and it’s not just hearsay. DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz has already begun reviewing documents that purportedly corroborate the whistleblower’s claims, and he has sought out both IRS and FBI witnesses. This is a serious matter that cannot be ignored.
2. IRS Agent Is Nonpartisan and Credentialed
The whistleblower is an IRS agent who is nonpartisan and credentialed. This means that he is not politically motivated and has the expertise to understand the intricacies of tax law. His allegations should be taken seriously and investigated thoroughly.
These are just two of the reasons why this whistleblower should terrify those behind the DOJ’s Biden family protection racket. The allegations are serious, and the evidence is mounting. It’s time for the truth to come out, and for those responsible to be held accountable.
Get ready to be blown away by the latest bombshell in the Biden protection racket! Even the whistleblower’s pedigree is enough to make them quake in their boots. According to the whistleblower’s attorney, this brave soul is a “career law enforcement official” who doesn’t have a political agenda, hasn’t made any political donations, and doesn’t even use social media. This is someone who takes their job seriously and is dedicated to upholding the law. So when they saw something fishy going on that didn’t follow the rules, they knew they had to come forward.
But it wasn’t an easy decision. The whistleblower had sleepless nights and wrestled with whether or not to speak out. In the end, they couldn’t live with themselves if they stayed quiet and said nothing. And now, they’re willing to face both sides of the political aisle and answer any questions they may have.
And if you’re worried about partisanship, don’t be. The whistleblower’s attorney has a track record of representing clients from both sides of the aisle, including a former FBI supervisor accused of pro-Biden bias. And the whistleblower’s own lengthy experience as an IRS special agent, trusted with international investigations and teaching other agents how to properly do investigations, only adds to their credibility.
So buckle up, folks. This is just the beginning.Are the Bidens above the law? Recent allegations suggest they might be. A whistleblower has come forward with claims that politically connected Hunter Biden received special treatment from the Department of Justice, with two Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys declining to seek a tax indictment against him. This is particularly concerning given the dual-authorization procedures required by the DOJ for criminal tax cases. The evidence underlying the proposed charges was strong, with both career investigators and career prosecutors in the DOJ tax division signing off on the recommended charges. Yet, the two Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys allegedly declined to seek charges against the president’s son, going against the recommendations of two distinct sets of career employees.
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has pointed out the obvious political favoritism shown to Hunter Biden. How else could he lie on a federal firearm form to purchase a handgun, only to lose physical possession of the gun and have it turn up across the street from a school, without getting charged with a federal crime? The gun offenses are so straightforward that they’d take a competent investigator five days, not five years, to wrap into a prosecutable case. Some of the tax offenses, which stretch back seven years or more, are so undeniable that liens were placed on Hunter’s properties.
The public has witnessed the president’s son escape any consequence for his clearly criminal conduct for years. It’s no wonder the whistleblower’s claims of political favoritism are believable. The timing of the allegations is also suspect, with The New York Times beginning to report on the issue in March of 2022. It’s time for the Bidens to be held accountable like any other citizen. No one is above the law.The New York Times tried to pull a fast one on Americans by downplaying Hunter Biden’s criminal conduct and prepping the country for his potential indictment. But it turns out, the DOJ and FBI already had Hunter Biden covered. The whistleblower’s allegations even implicate FBI headquarters and “specific DOJ employees” who allegedly placed restrictions on the investigation that could impact President Biden. This suggests political corruption beyond just the DOJ’s refusal to charge Hunter Biden with tax crimes. Margot Cleveland, The Federalist’s senior legal correspondent, breaks down the scandal and its implications for the Biden administration. As a lawyer and former full-time university faculty member, Cleveland provides insightful analysis on the legal and cultural issues at play.Meet Professor M.J. Cleveland, a passionate advocate for education and special-needs children. Follow her on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland to stay up-to-date on her latest insights and opinions. And while you’re here, check out some of our top tags, including Biden family, DOJ, FBI, Hunter Biden, IRS, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Whistleblower, and whistleblowers. Click on any of these buttons to explore related articles and stay informed on the latest news and developments. Remember, knowledge is power!
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...