9th Circuit: Local Authorities Can’t Block Federal Deportation Efforts

The Ninth Circuit court of Appeals recently⁣ ruled that federal authorities ​have the right to deport illegal immigrants even if⁤ local officials attempt ​to hinder these actions. This ⁤decision ​arose from a conflict between the Trump management and⁣ King County, Washington, where County Executive ‍Dow Constantine had issued an executive order in 2019 restricting local airport operators from providing services to Immigration and Customs​ Enforcement (ICE) flights responsible for ​deportations.

The court found that Constantine’s order ⁢violated the Supremacy Clause of the ‌U.S.‌ Constitution,which establishes that federal law takes precedence over contrary state ⁢or local policies. the ruling confirmed that local governments ​cannot impose regulations that obstruct federal operations, ‍notably in the ​transport of individuals under ICE’s jurisdiction. The⁤ panel emphasized that the order demonstrated discrimination against the federal government by unfairly⁤ regulating its operations.

King⁤ County‍ has‍ announced that it will not appeal the ruling, a decision aligned with the Trump administration’s agenda ‌to intensify ​immigration enforcement and deportation efforts, which are frequently enough resisted by “sanctuary cities” across the ‌country. The Trump administration’s⁢ plans include⁤ warning local governments ⁢against obstructing federal immigration policies, with statements asserting that such actions could lead ​to legal consequences.

the Ninth Circuit’s ruling underscores the federal government’s authority in immigration enforcement, mandating that local governments cannot ‌interfere with its operations, especially regarding⁢ deportations.


Share

A three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government has the authority to deport illegal immigrants even if local leaders try to impede the process.

The case arose after King County Executive Dow Constantine issued an executive order in 2019 that instructed county officials to prohibit “fixed base operators” (FBO) on a county airfield from servicing flights chartered by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deport illegal immigrants who are lawfully removable. FBO’s “lease space from the airport and provide flights with essential services, such as fueling and landing stairs,” according to the ruling.

The Trump administration sued because the order impeded ICE from enforcing the law and removing illegal immigrants. The administration argued that the order violated the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and a World War II-era agreement that gave the federal government permission to use the King County airport.

The three-judge panel affirmed both contentions. The panel ruled that the executive order was a violation of the Supremacy Clause’s intergovernmental immunity doctrine because it “improperly regulates the way in which the federal government transports noncitizen detainees by preventing ICE from using private FBO contractors at Boeing Field.” The court also held that the executive order discriminated against the federal government by “regulat[ing] them unfavorably on some basis related to their governmental ‘status.’”

King County said it would not appeal the ruling, according to The Seattle Times.

The incoming Trump administration has vowed to solve the border crisis and deport illegal immigrants who are draining taxpayer resources, while hordes of so-called “sanctuary cities” nationwide oppose enforcement of federal immigration law and go so far as to refuse to comply with ICE authorities.

Tom Homan, dubbed the incoming “border czar,” has already warned sanctuary city officials not to resist or impede the federal government’s deportation activities.

“It is a felony to knowingly harbor or conceal an illegal immigrant from immigration authorities. Don’t test us,” Homan said.

One Democrat, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, has already vowed to mobilize police and residents “stationed at the county line” to “keep” federal immigration authorities “out” of the city. Johnston likened the hypothetical to Tiananmen Square but later tried to walk back the comparison.

Homan responded to Johnston’s open defiance, saying he is “willing to put [Johnston] in jail.”




" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker