CNN’s Problems Are Bigger Than Jeff Zucker

CNN’s Problems Are Bigger Than Jeff Zucker

A photograph of John Malone.

The TV magnate John Malone, who has profited immensely from the consolidation of the media market, is poised to play an influential role in the new company.Photograph by Hans Christian Plambeck / Laif / Redux

In 1973, Tele-Communications Inc., a cable company headed by a thirty-two-year-old named John Malone, was having trouble getting the city of Vail, Colorado, to accept its rates. An engineer by training, Malone is possessed of what the media mogul Barry Diller once called “a frictionless mind.” He has been nicknamed the Cable Cowboy, Darth Vader, and Rupert Murdoch’s “frenemy.” Back then, he was just beginning to build what would become a sizable portion of the modern cable landscape. In Vail, his company took its programming off the air for a weekend, and instead broadcast the names and phone numbers of local officials who were standing in the way of a deal. In the end, Malone got what he wanted. As he later told Fortune, “We refuse to get raped by the programmers.”

Today, Malone (no relation to the author) is one of the largest private landowners in the U.S., a libertarian who has profited immensely from the consolidation of the media market. He spent the eighties and nineties acquiring various financial stakes in cable providers; when The New Yorker profiled him in 1994, Malone controlled one out of every four cable boxes in the country. At one point, his stake in NewsCorp threatened the Murdoch family’s control. Malone is also one of the largest shareholders in Discovery, known for reality-show offerings such as “90 Day Fiancé” and “Fixer Upper.” Malone calls this kind of television programming “comfort food.” “I grew up in front of a TV,” he told the Los Angeles Times, in 1993. “I get lonesome if it isn’t turned on.”

As consumers turn increasingly to streaming services, the cable landscape that Malone helped build is falling apart: for $13.99 a month, a Disney bundle can get you access to the Disney+ animated-film vault, the Kardashians’ forthcoming Hulu show, and ESPN’s myriad sports offerings. But Malone, at eighty years old—white-haired, with the wry, thin-lipped smile of a made-for-TV tycoon—is not finished yet. Soon, WarnerMedia, which is currently owned by A.T. & T., will merge with Discovery and make David Zaslav, Discovery’s current C.E.O., the head of a new company, with properties that include Warner Bros., HBO, and CNN. “John Malone is David Zaslav’s mastermind,” one TV-industry insider told me. “John Malone is the brains of the operation.”

The merger is an entrée into the streaming war dominated by the likes of Netflix, Amazon, and Disney+, and perhaps a continuation of a theme of Malone’s long career: a play for control in an ever-changing television landscape. Malone gave up supervoting shares in Discovery to form the new company. The largest shareholder in Warner Bros. Discovery will be Advance Publications, the parent company of Condé Nast and The New Yorker. Some argue that this means Malone’s role could be diluted, too. But people I talked to said that Malone’s close relationship with Zaslav and his acumen in the television business mean he will have an influence on the future of the new company that exceeds his ownership stake (which will be less than one per cent) and his single seat on the board of directors. “He’s incredibly vital to this deal and incredibly invested in this deal,” James Andrew Miller—the author of “Tinderbox,” an oral history of HBO, and one of the few journalists to interview the media-reticent Malone—said. “I’m so tired of people saying, ‘Well, you know, he’s eighty, he’s kind of out of it, or whatever’—but they don’t understand the nature of this guy.”

Recently, WarnerMedia has received some miserable press. CNN’s president, Jeff Zucker, was forced to resign––ostensibly for failing to disclose an intimate relationship with Allison Gollust, his closest colleague and the network’s chief marketing officer. That relationship, however, seems to be only one factor. Zucker’s departure came on the heels of the former anchor Chris Cuomo’s firing, amid speculations about his battle for severance from CNN. Cuomo was first suspended for offering inappropriate counsel to his brother, Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York, who resigned after multiple women accused him of sexual harassment. According to the New York Times, Zucker ultimately fired Chris after a woman’s allegations of sexual assault surfaced. (A spokesperson for WarnerMedia said that the company had already decided to terminate Chris because of his involvement with his brother’s defense, and the sexual-assault allegations only precipitated the announcement.) Chris Cuomo’s spokesperson told journalists that the allegations “are false” and that he “was never asked about the allegations prior to being terminated.”

Earlier in the pandemic, Zucker had pushed the Cuomo-brothers story line—Andrew would come on Chris’s show and they would discuss COVID safety while ribbing each other in an oddly puerile way for a news program. The shtick seemed to help ratings. A CNN journalist told me that Zucker was deeply involved in the details of those segments with the Cuomos and in coverage of the former governor, in general. Gollust, who formerly served as Andrew’s communications director, “was also involved in that, and people who are real journalists at the company found that very distasteful, given her prior employment.” The Times reported that an attorney for Chris “sent a letter to CNN demanding that the network preserve all documents related to any dealings between any CNN employee and anyone in the governor’s office,” a move that the Times noted might suggest that Zucker and others at CNN were also in touch with Andrew. In a memo issued Tuesday, the WarnerMedia C.E.O., Jason Kilar, said an investigation had found that Zucker, Gollust, and Cuomo had all violated company policies “including CNN’s News Standards and Practices.” That same day, Gollust resigned.

Risa Heller, a spokeswoman for both Zucker and Gollust, said it was “practically impossible for Jeff to be intimately involved in every editorial decision involving Governor Cuomo,” and that he “never gave Andrew Cuomo advice.” Heller added that Gollust “had no involvement in editorial decisions beyond booking.” On Friday, the Times reported that Andrew Cuomo sent Gollust messages about subjects he wished to be asked about on-air, which Gollust then sent to CNN staff, requesting they include them in their questions for the governor. (Heller told the Times that Gollust “in no way suggested that inclusion of these topics was a condition of the interview, nor did she suggest the interview should be limited to these subjects.”)

Zucker, who is an old friend of Zaslav’s, had been seen as a person who could protect CNN, its content, and its budgets, after the merger. That might have been magical thinking. Warner Bros. Discovery will have more than fifty billion dollars in debt. A person with close industry ties said that Zaslav will probably have to make three to four billion dollars in cuts once he takes over the new company. “That’s just to survive—forget about whether you’re going to be winning these [streaming] wars,” the source said. “There’s going to be an enormous amount of pain in terms of firing people.” These cost savings might prove especially painful for CNN, a relatively small asset. The network brought in $1.7 billion in revenue in 2020, according to estimates; that same year, HBO earned $6.8 billion. As the industry insider told me, “When people like [Zaslav]”—that is, someone used to the low-cost production of “Shark Week”—“run into what news organizations cost, what talent costs, what it costs to cover stories, they are actually flabbergasted.” That said, last week, after the Justice Department did not object to the merger, Zaslav called some of the anchors to say that he was excited and a fan of CNN.

Zaslav appears to be leaning into the Hollywood side of the operation. He recently posed for a Variety profile by a pool at the Beverly Hills Hotel, and has purchased a house owned by the late producer Robert Evans. His new world is glamorous, but the business challenges are steep. “Our job is to grow the right side of the company—the streaming business, the motion picture business and the TV production business—faster than the traditional business declines,” he told Variety, adding that movies were “​the top of the funnel” for driving new subscribers to its platforms, which the company hopes will reach two hundred million subscribers. In a 2019 interview with CNBC, Malone described the elements that would eventually lead to a winning streaming bundle. “As those new packages are created, the guys who have uniqueness will start extracting more and more share, the prices will go up, and we will see this play again,” he said. That “uniqueness” is likely not going to come from the news.

The launch, this spring, of CNN+, the network’s streaming service, only serves to highlight some of the problems that could confound CNN as it looks for a place in the new company. CNN has made a number of high-profile hires for CNN+, such as the former Fox News anchor Chris Wallace, the cook Alison Roman, and the actress Eva Longoria, who will host a food-and-travel series on Mexico. Tapper will have a book-club show, and Cooper will host one on parenting. Some employees, though, are dubious about who the audience for CNN+ will be. “Do people really love Jake Tapper enough to want to watch his book club?” one asked.

The TV insider told me that CNN+ is ultimately a way to build “muscle memory” for when the traditional cable landscape wanes and programming has to be moved to a streaming service. “They’re building a lifeboat,” the source said. “It will be part of an offering that will be seen as driving some value to the larger HBO Max bundle.” That outcome wasn’t particularly reassuring to the CNN journalist I spoke with: “If CNN+ is supposed to be the eventual off-ramp for CNN to get out of a dwindling business, not having it as a stand-alone makes us feel like we’re just kind of in this broader Discovery-WarnerMedia world.”

There are also concerns at CNN about Malone’s potential influence on the network’s editorial tone, which, during the Trump years, centered opinion in prime time more than it ever had. Some at the network have argued that the Trump Presidency and its assault on fact and the press necessitated that change in tone and emphasis. A few months ago, in another interview with CNBC, Malone said, “I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with and actually have journalists—which would be unique and refreshing.” CNN’s chief media correspondent, Brian Stelter, interpreted the remark ominously, writing, “Malone’s comments stoked fears that Discovery might stifle CNN journalists and steer away from calling out indecency and injustice.” Malone once praised Rush Limbaugh for his willingness “to say politically incorrect things” and told Ken Auletta, in the 1994 New Yorker Profile, that he and his wife were “not socialistic.”

Malone has called the idea of selling off CNN to make some cash “the coward’s way out.” But, given his lifelong proclivity for consolidation, there’s another move that he could advocate for in the relatively near future: he might want to sell off Warner Bros. Discovery to another, bigger streaming service. “I think that the number of people trying to do scripted programming on a global basis and buying this content away from each other will thin out as some people make it and some don’t,” he said, in 2019. “At some point some of the players are going to look at the numbers and they’re going to say, you know, we no longer have belief that . . . hail mary passes are going to keep working.” Cool and analytic, Malone could one day conclude that it would be best to cut loose from the streaming experiment as soon as the bottom line doesn’t compute.

In fact, the Warner Bros. Discovery deal is structured to make a sale quite feasible if the company decides—as A.T. & T. did—that it can’t compete on its own as a streaming giant. The great unbundling and re-bundling of media assets is still in its early stages, after all. “There’s going to be winners and losers,” Malone said, last year, of the transition from cable to streaming. “We’re only in the third inning of this nine-inning game.” It’s one he’ll want to win, if only for the hell of it. “I have earned so much money that money doesn’t interest me,” he told the German publication Der Spiegel, in 2001. “Now it is only the love of the game that drives me.” While he’s not the only powerful player at the new Warner Bros. Discovery table, he will undoubtedly still have a voice. “If you invite an eight-hundred-pound gorilla to lunch, he’s going to eat what he wants,” the person familiar with Malone said. “He has a seat at the table, and he’s very good at expressing his opinions.”


Read More From Original Article Here:

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker