Is This Proof Ketanji Brown Jackson Lied About Second Amendment Rights at Her Hearings?

Following the majority draft opinion associated with Dobbs sixth is v. Jackson Women’s Health Company was leaked out, the left quickly mobilized with the talking points that will Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, plus Barrett lied about Roe v. Sort being “settled precedent. ” It was a waste argument, of course , as there is absolutely no such thing as “settled precedent. ” If there was, slavery would still be lawful. Nevertheless, it’s an argument which was endlessly repeated after the Dobbs opinion was leaked.

So , my issue is: Will the same people that accused Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, plus Barrett of lying furthermore accuse Joe Biden’s recently-confirmed U. Ersus. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson of lying down about the individual right to maintain and bear arms getting under the Second Amendment?

During Jackson’s verification hearings, Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) asked her regarding District of Columbia v. Heller, which usually Jackson said she had been familiar with.

“That was a decision by the Best Court that recognized the person right to keep and carry arms under the Second Variation. Correct? ” Cornyn requested.

“Yes, ” Jackson replied.

Then Cornyn asked, “Is that a precedent of the Courtroom? ”

Knutson replied, “It is. ”

“And you will respect that precedent? ”

“Yes, senator, ” Jackson told your pet. “All precedents of the Best Court have to be respected. ”

She reiterated the point under questioning through Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn. )

“You agree it is an individual correct not only reserved to militias. Because there are some that maintain trying to say that it’s just reserved to militias. When my memory is proper, you base this upon District of Columbia v. Heller , ” Sen. Blackburn asked the girl.

“Yes, ma’am. The Supreme Court has generated it is an individual right, ” Jackson responded.

Related: My Weapons Aren’t Shooting Anyone. So why should I Give Them Up?

However Judge Jackson was taken on video applauding Brand new Zealand’s assault weapons prohibit. New Zealand Prime Ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) Jacinda Ardern mentioned the girl country banning assault weaponry while delivering a beginning speech for Harvard College graduates on May twenty six. Video of the speech displays Jackson, who was in presence, clapping after Ardern pointed out New Zealand’s ban.

“In the past 10 years, we have passed laws including everything from the introduction of gay relationship and the banning of transformation therapy, right through to sneaking in a 1 . 5-degree environment change target into regulation, banning military-style semi-automatics plus assault rifles, and the decriminalization of abortion, ” stated Ardern, which was met along with applause from the pending Best Court Justice.

[embedded content]

Is this proof that will Jackson doesn’t believe that the best to bear arms is a preceding of the Supreme Court that needs to be respected? Did she expose that, should an attack weapons ban come prior to the Supreme Court, she would not really respect the individual right to endure arms, which was established with the Second Amendment and established by Region of Columbia v. Heller, as the girl said she would?

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases