The Outrageous Response to ‘It’s Okay to be White’ Poll

Commentary

People who think they can be manipulated are the easiest to propagandize. Their blindness to deception allows them to overlook it, and ultimately their downfall is their inability to question their confirmation bias.

2021 was a year of anti-critical race theory. They recognized the problems in public schools. They were pushing racially hostile rhetoric at white people, and perpetuating victim narratives about minorities. They weren’t ready for the psychological creation and perpetuation of racial hatred by sustained racial attacks.

Critical race theory aims to raise awareness of racism and make Americans see the world from a racial perspective. Leftists believe that all decisions should be taken with racial identity in consideration. “positive discrimination” can be used in a proper manner. However, to do this, they must also convince others to be racially radicalized.

People make the mistake of believing that to be racially conscious, one must accept neoMarxist ideas. But, it is possible to make people more racially-aware by making them the targets, creating a new victim group.

This tactic achieves the exact result they desire: It makes white people feel more important because they’re under attack. They can only notice themselves as whiter and more often notice others of their race.

It is easier to make you the victim of leftist indoctrination if you are proud to proclaim your white identity.

In an effort to fight indoctrination some of the anti-woke movements have become radicalized and can be used by leftists to motivate others.

Because actual racist events were few and far between, one of the reasons the woke’s stories didn’t always make it to the mainstream was that they weren’t consistent. However, the long-game strategy was to make enemies by attacking a certain demographic relentlessly and inducing racial hatred.

We are now in another phase in the culture war. Some of our moral warriors, who were fighting against racist and illogical indoctrination, have unprincipledly accepted white victimhood and are looking for an oppressor to blame.

In a fresh Rasmussen poll The study involved 1,000 participants. Respondents were asked if the statement was agreeable. “It’s OK to be white,” You have the option to accept, reject, or claim neutrality. “not sure” response. The results of the poll caused controversy immediately because people were focusing on the 47 percent Respondents of color who disagreed or were not satisfied with the statement. “not sure.”

Right-wing leaders were furious about the poll’s potential implications, but they didn’t apply any scrutiny to it. They quickly translated it as “millions of black people hate white people” to support the white victim narrative.

In their rush to conclude that there was a lot of racism directed at white Americans by black Americans, they neglected key details about the poll. Out of 1,000 polled, only 130 were blackThis refers to the 47 percent percent black respondents who disagreed with or were not happy with the statement. “not sure” There were 61 total. That’s all.

This is because some right-wing leaders made inciting accusations of racial animosity against millions of black people due to a single low-participant survey.

Let’s not forget the statement “It’s OK to be white”? This is a loaded question to ask people. Many may be confused and assume it refers to something they don’t know. It’s a strange statement that we can ask people about. This makes it easy for respondents to think it might be nefarious.

One thing I don’t think most people understand about certain leftist strategies, is their desire for the political right to respond emotionally. Because they know it will result in an equally bizarre and absurd reaction, they are more extreme and ridiculous.

Your ultimate goal is to be as sensitive, racially aware, and paranoid than they are. It doesn’t matter whether you are an anti-racist, they will gladly accept you as a member.

The views expressed in this article reflect the opinions of the author, and not necessarily the views of The Epoch Times.