The doctor is in: Fauci remains in spotlight months after leaving post as Biden top doc

Dr. Anthony Fauci Months after his departure as President, he is still very much in the limelight Joe BidenRepublicans investigate the top medical advisor of the United States. Origins of COVID-19 Fauci and Fauci as Fauci himself, and as Fauci pushes back.

Fauci is a lightning rod because of his defense of U.S. government funding for coronavirus research in the U.S. Wuhan. Republicans Intend to drag him before their boards Now that they have a House majority, Fauci seems to be in control Enjoy his fights with the GOP He continues to be a sought-after guest on cable news.

FAUCI DEFENDS GAIN OF-FUNCTION REEARCH: “IT NEEDS TO BEEN REGULATED”

This week, the Republican-led House Select Committee on Coronavirus Pandemic began with three witnesses arguing on Wednesday about whether it was. Possible, or most likely, that COVID-19 Emerged Fauci had long doubted Fauci’s belief in this hypothesis. It was found in Wuhan at a Chinese government laboratory.

Fauci was the next sign of things to follow. House Republicans have been repeatedly criticised as well as Dr. Robert Redfield (ex-director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Donald Trump. Fauci insists on a natural emergence, but Redfield testified that this week’s data supports that argument. “indicates that COVID-19 more likely was the result of an accidental lab leak.”

Fauci Continued Fox News announced Thursday that he would be on Thursday at Fox News “more than happy to testify” If he is asked to appear, he must do so before the Republican led committee.

Scientists working with the U.S. government during the pandemic of 2020 believed COVID-19. Originating in a lab in Wuhan It was possible, or even probable, but emails indicate that Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, then-Director of the NIH, were able to confirm this. It worked Shut down the hypothesis Below are some emails that were previously released Notes from a conference call on February 1, 2020 With at least 11 scientists speculating about the virus’s origin, Many lean towards the lab leak.

During the House, Fauci’s three-year-old call was front and center. Hear This week.

Redfield testified Wednesday about how he found out about the early 2020 conference calls only after the emails were published.

“I was quite upset, as the CDC director, that I was excluded from those discussions,” Redfield claimed he was excluded “because I had a different point of view, and I was told they made a decision that they would keep this confidential until they came up with a single narrative.”

Fauci argued Thursday Redfield “is totally and unequivocally incorrect in what he’s saying that I excluded him” Contended that “I had nothing to do with who would be on that call.” Fauci said further that “retrospectively, it would’ve been okay” Redfield is available to answer your calls.

Fauci and other characters are also featured in new emails. “prompted” A scientific paper of great importance that refutes the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis In the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Redfield testified Wednesday to the fact that Fauci’s actions had been fraudulent. “antithetical to science.”

“This was a narrative that was decided that they were going to say this came from the wet market, and they were going to do everything they could to support that and to negate any discussion of the possibility that this came from the lab,” Redfield testified.

Fauci claimed that Thursday was the day. “I’ve always kept an open mind” About the origins of COVID-19.

“I wasn’t leaning totally strongly one way or the other,” Fauci said, adding, “The evidence weighs more likely towards one, namely a natural occurrence, but