Judge Rules House GOP Can Subpoena Ex-Prosecutor From Trump Probe

A jury ruled on Wednesday that a former Manhattan attorney may give testimony to the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee regarding the legal case against former President Donald Trump.

Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, asked U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil to halt a lawsuit aimed at Mark Pomerantz, who had argued strongly that Trump may be charged, but the decision was denied.

The subpoena was issued with a” valid legislative purpose” in connection with the” widespread” and” immediately” congressional power to” conduct investigations ,” according to Vyskocil’s’s ruling, who was appointed by Trump.

The judge continued,” The federal court does not have the authority to determine what legislation Congress may consider or how it may perform its discussions in that regard. For the parliamentary deposition, Mr. Pomerantz may appear. Nobody is exempt from the law.

After Bragg officially expressed skepticism about the way he inherited from his father, Pomerantz and another Manhattan prosecutor who was in charge of the Trump investigation abruptly resigned in February of last year. Pomerantz insisted Trump was” innocent of several criminal violations” in a resignation letter that afterwards came to light. Since then, he and Carey Dunne, the other former prosecutor, have established a law firm. He also took part in the press tour earlier this year for the publication of” People vs. Donald Trump.”

Trump was charged with falsifying business reports as part of what Bragg claimed to be a” catch-and-kill” scheme to sway the 2016 election late last month, and the former president later entered not guilty pleas to 34 felony works. Trump, who has just begun a 2024 presidential system, denies any crime.

A supporter of Trump, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan( R – OH ), has been looking into the Manhattan case. Jordan sent a summons to Pomerantz to ask for his testimony, claiming that the previous prosecutor’s’s public remarks regarding the investigation into allegations that Trump and his partners made covert purchases during the 2016 election cycle suggested the district attorney in Manhattan had political motivations. Democrat Bragg then accused Jordan of” barrier and interference” in a lawsuit that sought to halt the lawsuit.

TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP, CLICK Around

Jordan’s’s spokesman, Russell Dye, stated on Wednesday that” we look forward to his testimony before the Judiciary Committee and that Congress has the ability to perform monitoring and issue summons to people like Mark Pomeranz.”

However, the constitutional battle over the lawsuit is far from over.

Bragg’s team and Pomerantz moved to appeal the decision to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan. Though Pomerantz had been set to testify on Thursday morning, the federal appeals court agreed to a pause so that a three-judge panel could consider the motion seeking a stay pending appeal of the district court’s order. Both sides were ordered to file responses in the coming days.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases