Washington Examiner

NRCC criticizes Spanberger’s ‘radical voting record’, dismisses her as a ‘moderate’.

NRCC Slams Rep. ⁤Abigail​ Spanberger for‌ “Radical Voting ​Record” Despite‍ Claiming ‌to⁤ be a Moderate

The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) is⁢ calling out ⁤Rep. Abigail Spanberger⁣ (D-VA) for⁢ her ‌alleged “radical voting record” ⁤in the​ House of Representatives, ⁤despite​ presenting⁢ herself ‍as a moderate. ⁤In an exclusive memo obtained by⁢ the ​Washington​ Examiner,​ the ⁤NRCC cites ⁣the D.C. crime⁢ bill⁣ and other legislation as​ evidence ​that⁢ Spanberger is ​more ‍extreme than ​she ‍portrays.

“Abigail ​Spanberger​ talks⁢ like⁢ a so-called ‘moderate’ ⁣but ⁤her​ voting record tells ‌a⁢ different‍ story,” ⁣the memo ​states. “Throughout her‌ time in Congress,⁢ Spanberger​ has aligned ‍herself with the ‌extreme ⁣left of ​her party,⁢ reflecting ​the⁢ hard-left shift of Virginia Democrats.”

The NRCC ⁤claims ‍that ⁤Spanberger’s⁣ leftward ⁣shift has alienated voters⁤ in ⁣her swing district, ⁣and they have targeted ‍her‍ seat ⁢for the ‍2024 cycle. The memo highlights⁣ Spanberger’s ​voting⁢ record ⁣in ‌the previous‍ Congress,⁢ where she ⁢voted⁣ in‍ line with President ‌Joe ⁤Biden 100%​ of⁤ the‍ time, according to ⁢FiveThirtyEight. ‌It⁤ also points out her​ votes against blocking⁢ a gas ‍stove ban, ​reducing energy production ⁤regulations, ⁤ensuring‍ medical care for ​babies​ born after failed abortions,​ and ⁤protecting​ parental rights in ‍education. Additionally, the ‍memo‍ highlights ⁣her ​vote in⁣ favor⁤ of⁣ a pathway to amnesty for ‍illegal immigrants.

As ‍a ⁢case⁢ study, ‌the memo focuses on ‌Spanberger’s vote⁤ against​ blocking⁤ a crime⁢ bill ‌in Washington, D.C., ⁢which ⁢aimed to soften punishments​ for ⁢homicide, robberies, and‌ carjackings. The⁢ House​ bill to⁤ block the ⁣D.C. ⁣council’s ⁢legislation passed with ⁣a⁤ 250-173 ⁣vote, with⁣ 31 Democrats joining Republicans.‌ Spanberger ⁢was⁢ among the‍ 173 Democrats ⁢who‌ voted⁢ against blocking the D.C. law. ⁢The ⁢Senate ⁤also ​voted ‍overwhelmingly⁣ to ​block the legislation on‍ a ⁤bipartisan ​basis, ⁢and President Biden would have signed it⁢ into‍ law.

“Notably, this ⁢stance⁢ was too ⁤extreme even‍ for ⁣President Biden, who ultimately ​changed ‌his ⁣position ‌and‍ signed the bill‌ into‌ law,” the​ memo points out. ⁣”By voting⁣ ‘no,’ Spanberger‌ demonstrated ‍her ⁢radicalism⁤ to ‌voters, showing ⁢that even ​within ⁤the​ Democratic Party, her views are ⁣extreme.”

The NRCC ​argues that ‌Spanberger’s ⁢support for ‌this bill will have real-life consequences for her ⁣own ⁣district,‍ especially ⁢since Washington, D.C.‍ is ⁤in ‍her backyard.⁣ They⁤ also highlight​ that both ⁤of Virginia’s Senators, Warner ⁤and Kaine, voted⁣ against the ​legislation, ⁢further emphasizing the extreme‌ nature of Spanberger’s ‍vote.

The ​NRCC accuses ⁢Spanberger of⁣ sacrificing her​ carefully crafted brand ​with ‌her voting ⁤record in⁢ Congress.​ They ⁤vow⁣ to continue pressing her ⁢on⁣ her alleged⁣ radicalism and ensure‍ that ⁣every ‌Virginia voter knows the⁢ “real” ⁢Abigail Spanberger.

Click⁤ here to ⁣read⁢ more from the ⁣Washington Examiner.

Spanberger⁢ has been a prime ​target ⁣for Republicans since ⁢she flipped⁢ a⁣ formerly ‌GOP House ⁢seat ‌in 2018.​ The NRCC ‍has ⁤listed her as one of ‌37 ⁢House⁢ Democrats they aim to defeat in ⁢2024. Despite facing⁣ challenges⁢ from Republicans Nick ⁢Freitas⁣ and Yesli ⁣Vega in 2020 and ⁣2022 respectively,⁢ Spanberger‌ managed to ‍secure‌ narrow ⁤victories ⁤in both elections.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker