Washington Examiner

Why does Biden persist with legally unsustainable policies?

President Biden’s New Student Loan Plan Faces Challenges

President ⁣Joe⁤ Biden wasted no time in‌ responding ‍to ‍the Supreme Court’s rejection of ‌his⁤ student loans plan. Despite facing⁢ opposition ​from both the⁤ court‌ and ⁢Congress, the Biden administration unveiled a⁢ new​ action last⁣ week, vowing to ‍continue ⁢their ‌efforts leading‍ up ⁤to ⁣the ‌2024 ⁤elections.

“President Biden ⁤continues to fight ‌for ⁢student ​loan ​borrowers on ⁣all‌ fronts,” ‍a White House ⁢official stated.

The​ new‍ plan ​includes an “adjustment” ‍to ⁢the ⁣existing income-driven⁢ repayment program, resulting‍ in the ⁢cancellation ​of $39 billion‌ in loans for‍ 800,000‍ borrowers. While‍ this ⁢is a⁢ smaller ‍percentage compared to⁣ the original loan forgiveness ⁤scheme, the⁢ political⁤ impact‍ remains the same — officials ​will highlight their⁢ efforts to‌ assist borrowers while‍ Republicans⁤ voice their‌ objections.

House⁣ Education and ⁢Workforce⁢ Committee ⁢Chairwoman ⁣Virginia ⁢Foxx (R-NC) immediately criticized the latest‌ move, calling it “a desperate Hail ‌Mary ⁤attempt to‍ save his bid⁣ for ​reelection.”

“It’s ⁢embarrassing,​ but ⁣more ​importantly, his willingness⁢ to ignore ⁢the ​Supreme⁢ Court ⁤and thumb his ⁤nose⁤ at the ⁤rule of law ‌reveals⁣ a ‌man who ‌believes his⁤ power is absolute,” Foxx ⁤said. “That is not someone who​ deserves ​to lead our​ great Republic.”

The Biden administration has also expressed ⁣interest in ‍exploring‌ other avenues for implementing broad student​ loan forgiveness, ensuring ​that‍ the issue⁤ will‌ remain ‍a prominent ⁣topic for‌ Democrats well ⁤into 2024 and⁢ beyond.

Biden had promised to cancel student loan debt during his ‍successful‍ 2020 presidential campaign, ⁣but initially stated that Congress would need to take action first. Congress ⁢eventually did address the issue, overturning the student‌ debt⁤ transfer ⁤in ‌June. Although⁣ Biden vetoed the decision, he ​was‍ unable to prevent⁢ the⁤ Supreme‌ Court‍ from⁢ striking down ⁣the program later⁢ that month.

Nevertheless,⁣ the White House has not​ been deterred‌ and‌ has pursued alternative⁤ measures,⁢ such as the new $39​ billion program. ​They have also ⁣discussed​ the ⁣possibility⁢ of attempting‍ the $400-plus ​billion program under the​ Higher⁣ Education ⁢Act, rather ‍than relying⁢ on the ‍HEROES Act as a legal justification.

From a political ⁤standpoint, ‍Biden has ⁢squarely placed ⁢the blame on the ​Supreme‍ Court.

“I didn’t​ give any ⁢false⁣ hope,” he stated on ‌June‌ 30. “What I‌ did,⁤ I thought, was⁣ appropriate and⁣ achievable. I didn’t ‍give⁤ borrowers⁣ false ⁣hope.⁤ But the Republicans snatched away the ⁤hope that ⁣was given.”

This court defeat follows‍ a familiar ​pattern⁤ for Biden, particularly ‌regarding policies developed ‌during⁣ the ​pandemic.⁢ The⁣ White House‍ has faced numerous​ setbacks ‍in the ​judicial system, ​ranging from the eviction​ moratorium ‍to federal‍ mask⁣ and ⁤vaccine mandates, as⁣ well as the southern‌ border‌ expulsion.

Foxx is not‌ alone‌ in ⁤suggesting​ that political motives influenced ⁢some of⁣ these ‍decisions. The‍ announcement ​of student‌ loan ‍forgiveness⁤ coincided with ‌the start​ of early‌ voting for the midterm elections ‍in⁣ late‍ August ⁢2022, only‌ to be blocked⁤ in ⁤court ‌two ⁣days after the election concluded. Even some ‌progressives questioned the president’s intentions.

“They used the promise ⁣of‍ student⁢ debt cancellation to‍ induce young voter turnout — knowing⁤ it wasn’t⁢ going anywhere because ‌they relied on⁤ faulty legal‍ authority,” former Bernie Sanders⁢ spokeswoman ‍Briahna‍ Joy Gray tweeted ‍at‍ the time. “It’s hard ‍to⁤ convince me that ⁣the Biden ⁣administration didn’t ⁢do this intentionally.”

More recently, Boston University⁢ law professor⁣ Jed Shugerman⁤ suggested​ that⁤ losing⁢ the ⁤case may‍ have‍ been ​part ⁣of ‍the‌ administration’s⁤ political⁣ strategy.

“Frankly, if I’m being​ a little ‍cynical here, I think‍ maybe⁤ they ⁤took​ the Supreme ‍Court threat so seriously ⁣that ⁤it was part⁢ of⁣ their own ⁣political game​ plan,”​ he ⁣said.

However, financial aid and student ⁤loan‌ researcher Mark Kantrowitz argues ‌that the​ new, more limited $39 ⁣billion program​ is ‍likely to withstand legal⁤ scrutiny.

“This program will satisfy ⁤legal scrutiny because⁣ Congress already ‌authorized ‍it,” he explained.‌ “The Republicans ‌won’t⁤ be ​happy, but ​there’s⁢ nothing they can do about it.”

Administration officials‍ are⁤ openly discussing the possibility ​of reviving the larger program using the ⁢Higher Education ⁤Act. However, ⁤Kantrowitz⁢ believes⁢ that ‌this approach is ‌unlikely ⁣to ‌succeed, ⁤especially ​in court.

“There ‌are more reasons‌ why ⁣the Higher Education ​Act ​will⁤ fail than the ⁢HEROES Act ‌attempt ⁤failed,” he said. “As far as a⁤ plan B, I think ‌that’s being driven⁢ more by politics than policy.​ It ⁤provides hope ahead ‌of the next ‍election⁢ and⁢ establishes a ‍sharp⁤ contrast⁢ between⁢ Democrats ⁤and ‍Republicans.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON ​EXAMINER



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker