Giuliani, researchers urge judge to reject Hunter Biden plea deal, citing laptop evidence of numerous crimes.

A Call to⁣ Reject the ⁤Plea ‌Deal: ⁣Hunter ⁤Biden’s Laptop Controversy

A⁤ nonprofit research group, Marco Polo, ​has taken ‌a bold stance in the tax⁣ fraud case involving ‌Hunter ⁤Biden. In a letter addressed to Judge Maryellen Noreika, the organization​ urges her to reject the plea deal offered ⁤by prosecutors. This plea deal, if accepted, would ‍not⁣ only trivialize the​ severity⁤ of the crimes committed but‍ also send‍ a disheartening​ message to⁤ the public about the ⁣influence of nepotism and political power in‌ our criminal justice system.

Marco ⁣Polo, known for its extensive analysis of⁤ the emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, has​ made its case clear.⁣ They argue that judges⁢ have the authority ⁤to refuse ⁤plea deals, even if both the prosecutors ⁤and the‍ defendant ‍agree​ on them. The ⁣organization​ emphasizes that the⁢ evidence found on the​ laptop points to at ‍least 459 violations of state and federal laws and regulations.⁤ These violations include 140 ​business-related crimes,‌ 191 sex-related crimes, and 128 drug-related crimes. The evidence supporting these claims includes emails, photos, videos,‍ text messages,⁣ and audio files.

Marco ⁣Polo goes on to⁢ explain that the proposed plea deal is ‌so inadequate that the term “limited hangout” fails to capture its true nature. A “limited ⁣hangout” ‌is a public​ relations tactic⁣ used ⁤to⁢ admit to a small portion of wrongdoing⁤ in order ​to give the impression that‌ the issue ​has‍ been resolved. The organization argues that this plea⁣ deal ‌falls ‌far short of justice.

Giuliani’s Support and Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct

Joining‌ Marco Polo in this plea to the judge is‍ Rudy Giuliani, the former⁢ attorney for​ Donald Trump. Giuliani, with his experience as a United States⁢ Attorney, is uniquely ‍qualified to identify a ⁣”sweetheart” deal reserved for individuals ​like​ Hunter Biden, ‍whose father is the president. The letter ⁢highlights that without Biden’s familial connections,⁢ no prosecutor ⁤would have proposed such lenient terms, including​ two misdemeanors and essentially a non-prosecution on the felony gun charge.

The letter also reveals that Robert Costello, Giuliani’s ​own lawyer and a former ⁤deputy​ in the New York prosecutor’s office,⁤ has signed the letter as well. Together,‍ they raise concerns about prosecutorial misconduct surrounding the plea deal.

According to the‌ letter, congressional⁤ oversight and whistleblower disclosures have‌ shed ​light on ‌potential misconduct. The plea‍ deal, ‍limited to misdemeanor‍ tax charges, would ​allow a felony gun charge to be dismissed under a ⁣diversion program, with‍ only probation as the⁢ penalty. The letter alleges ⁤that​ Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf, along with her colleague Mark Daly, leaked information to the Bidens, ‍tipping them off about an⁤ imminent raid on a storage ⁤unit. This ⁤leak‌ infuriated IRS investigators and potentially violated both Pennsylvania Bar rules and⁣ federal statutes. Furthermore, Wolf allegedly concealed evidence, ​discouraged inquiries ⁣about the U.S. president, and prioritized “optics” over‍ investigative‍ steps.

The letter also mentions that Hunter Biden’s ​lawyer, Chris Clark, warned ​prosecutors that their careers would be ruined ​if⁤ they pursued various charges ⁢against Hunter. Additionally, the letter‍ points out that the proposed plea deal, charging Hunter Biden under 26 USC §7203 as a standalone‌ misdemeanor, is unprecedented in the ​District of Delaware since 1995.

Finally, the letter highlights the upcoming testimony‍ of Hunter Biden’s former business partner, Devon Archer, before the ⁢Oversight and Accountability Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. The organization urges the court⁣ to consider this testimony ‍before accepting the plea offer, emphasizing the importance of being fully informed about ‌all relevant facts.