Washington Examiner

Judge dismisses Trump’s defamation suit against CNN over ‘Hitler-like’ portrayal.

Trump’s Lawsuit‌ Against CNN Dismissed by⁣ Judge

On Friday ⁢night, a judge dismissed former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against CNN⁤ in which​ the ⁢current 2024 front-runner for the Republican nomination claimed CNN’s coverage of his election lies equated him to Adolf⁣ Hitler and Nazi Germany.

Judge Raag Singhal, a Trump-appointed judge, ruled that⁤ CNN referring to ⁢Trump’s claims about‍ the election being stolen as “The Big Lie” did not⁤ meet the criteria for defamation despite Trump’s belief to the contrary.

Inflation Declined to ⁣3% ⁣in ​June, According to Key Gauge​ Watched by Fed

“There is no question that the statements made by CNN meet the​ publication requirement for defamation under Florida ​law,” Singhal wrote. ‌”The​ next question is⁤ whether the​ statements were false statements of fact. This is where‌ Trump’s defamation claims fail.”

Trump claimed that “the use of the phrase‍ ‘the Big Lie’ constitutes defamation” ​ because it “create[s] ⁣ a false and ⁤incendiary association between the Plaintiff and Hitler.”

He also argued that CNN using “the Big Lie”⁢ is defamatory because it “has incited readers and viewers to hate, contempt, ⁣distrust,⁤ ridicule,⁢ and even fear” ​Trump, which caused “injury ‌to the Plaintiff, the⁢ Plaintiff’s reputation, and ⁢the Plaintiff’s political career.” Because of this, ​“Trump claims that viewers ‍and readers ‘understood that Plaintiff would be Hitler-like in any future political role.'”

Singhal evaluated⁤ five instances Trump argued the network defamed him, including written columns and on-air segments that ranged from comparing the former president’s rhetoric with Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels to linking his efforts at narrative ⁣shaping to those used in “authoritarian states.”

However, Singhal determined the critiques of Trump were “opinion, ⁣not actually false statements.” Despite​ harsh criticisms of ⁣news outlets and readers,‌ Singhal wrote that‍ CNN or any other organization operating with a “political motivation does not establish falsity.”

“Acknowledging that CNN acted with⁤ political enmity does not save this case; ​the Complaint alleges no false statements of fact,” he wrote. “Trump complains that CNN described his election challenges as ‘the Big Lie.’ Trump argues that ⁢’the Big Lie’ is a phrase⁤ attributed to ⁢Joseph Goebbels and that CNN’s‌ use of the phrase wrongly links ​Trump with the Hitler regime in ​the public eye. This is a stacking of inferences that cannot support a ​finding of falsehood.”

Trump also argued that CNN ⁤failed to “similarly challenge Democrat politicians who complained about⁣ election integrity,” and‌ this ⁤showed “evidence that​ Defendant is not⁣ reporting the news, but rather ‌propagating its political views.”

The​ judge did not buy the arguments saying that “CNN’s statements, while repugnant, were not, as a matter of law, defamatory.” He dismissed the case with prejudice.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker