Judge dismisses Trump’s defamation suit against CNN over ‘Hitler-like’ portrayal.

Trump’s Lawsuit Against CNN Dismissed by Judge

On Friday night, a judge dismissed former President⁢ Donald Trump’s lawsuit against CNN in which the current 2024 front-runner for the Republican​ nomination claimed CNN’s coverage of his election lies equated him to Adolf Hitler and ​Nazi Germany.

Judge Raag Singhal, a‌ Trump-appointed judge, ruled that CNN referring to Trump’s claims about the election being stolen⁤ as “The‍ Big Lie” did not meet the criteria for defamation despite Trump’s ⁤belief to the contrary.

Inflation Declined to 3%‌ in ​June, According to Key Gauge Watched by Fed

“There is no question‌ that the statements made by ⁢CNN⁤ meet the publication requirement for defamation under Florida law,” Singhal wrote. “The next question is whether the statements were false statements of fact. This is where Trump’s defamation claims fail.”

Trump claimed that “the use of the phrase ‘the Big Lie’ constitutes defamation” because it‌ “create[s] a false and⁤ incendiary association ⁢between the‌ Plaintiff and Hitler.”

He also argued that CNN‍ using “the Big Lie” is ⁣defamatory because it “has incited readers and viewers to hate, contempt, distrust, ridicule, and even fear” Trump, which caused “injury to‌ the Plaintiff, ⁢the ​Plaintiff’s reputation, and the Plaintiff’s political career.” Because of this, “Trump claims that viewers and readers ‘understood that Plaintiff would be Hitler-like in any future political role.'”

Singhal evaluated five instances Trump argued ‌the network defamed him, including written columns and on-air segments that ranged from comparing the former⁢ president’s rhetoric with Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels to linking his efforts at narrative shaping to those used in “authoritarian states.”

However, Singhal determined the critiques ⁤of Trump were “opinion, not actually false statements.” Despite harsh criticisms of news outlets and readers, Singhal wrote that CNN or any other organization ​operating with a ‍”political motivation does not establish falsity.”

“Acknowledging that CNN acted with political ‌enmity‍ does not save this case; the Complaint alleges ⁣no false statements of fact,” he wrote. “Trump complains that CNN described his election challenges as ‘the Big Lie.’ Trump argues that ‘the Big Lie’ is a phrase attributed ​to Joseph Goebbels and‍ that CNN’s use of the phrase wrongly links Trump with‍ the Hitler regime in the public eye. This is a stacking of inferences that cannot support a finding of falsehood.”

CLICK HERE TO READ⁤ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Trump also argued that CNN failed ⁣to “similarly challenge⁤ Democrat politicians who ⁢complained about election ⁢integrity,” and this showed⁣ “evidence that Defendant is not​ reporting the news, but rather propagating⁢ its political views.”

The judge did not buy the arguments saying that “CNN’s statements, while repugnant, were⁢ not, as a matter of law, defamatory.” He dismissed the case​ with prejudice.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases