‘Bidenomics’ is a disaster.

Joe‌ Biden’s “Bidenomics” and the American⁤ Dream

After‍ 40 years of “trickle-down‍ economics,” Joe Biden says, “Bidenomics is just another way of saying restoring the ​American Dream.”

It’s not often that a politician openly pledges ​to bring the⁢ country back to‌ a time of crippling inflation, high energy prices, and stifling interest rates. But this ‌president is doing⁢ his best to keep that promise.

Unsurprisingly, ⁢”Bidenomics” is failing to gain traction among voters. This has caused consternation in the media. One thing to remember, though, is that “Bidenomics” isn’t really a thing. ⁢Unlike, say, “Reaganomics,” which helped‍ bring about the largest expansion⁤ of the middle ⁤class in world history, the president does not subscribe to any coherent or ‍tangible set of economic theories⁤ or ⁢principles. The White House defines ‌its economic policy⁣ as being “rooted in the recognition that the best way to grow the economy is ​from the middle out and the bottom up,”⁤ which is just ⁤platitudinous‍ gibberish.

“Bidenomics” encompasses⁢ anything and ⁣everything that’s convenient for Democrats. And in ⁢this moment, it’s convenient for⁣ them‌ to take credit for merely letting people go back to work. Biden, who once claimed that⁣ the Democrats $3.5 trillion “Build Back Better”‍ plan cost “zero dollars,” isn’t exactly a math whiz. But when ⁢he says ​stuff like “13.4 million​ jobs have been added to our ‍economy” under his watch, more than “any other‌ president in‌ a full 4-year term,” anyone with even ‌a passing familiarity with the events of the years preceding 2023 knows ​it’s a lie ⁤of omission.

The notion that presidents “create” jobs is itself a ⁣fantasy. In this case, though, Biden supported efforts to ⁢shutter private businesses ⁢during the pandemic, basically closing down the entire economy, not only while running for president but‌ after winning office. When Florida, and other​ states, attempted to ease some restrictions, President Biden told them to “get out of the way” so that people could “do the right thing.” ⁢The pressure exerted ⁣on ⁢states ⁤to “do the right thing” was immense.

All of which is to say that the president and his allies had far more ‍to do with destroying jobs than creating them. We don’t need to relitigate​ the efficacy of COVID policy here, but approximately 10 million of the jobs that Biden now brags about overseeing are just ⁣people coming back to the workforce after‌ state-compelled lockdowns.

Then again, if “Bidenomics” had meant doing absolutely nothing, it would have been the president’s greatest political accomplishment. But that would have meant allowing a crisis to go to waste. Instead, what “Bidenomics” did help create was the⁢ biggest four-year inflationary spike under any president in 40 years.

By the time the “American Rescue ⁤Plan” was passed, there was already too⁤ much ​money chasing too few goods. Tons of people warned ⁢about​ the consequences of dumping more money into the economy. Even when inflation began inching‌ up, Biden dismissed it — “no serious⁣ economist” is “suggesting there’s unchecked inflation on the way,” he said. Democrats, of course,⁢ wanted to cram through a $5 trillion progressive agenda spending bill. So when inflation became a big non-transitory political problem, the Biden administration began arguing that more spending would help ease inflation.

Again, the vital thing to remember about “Bidenomics” is that it makes absolutely zero sense.

Only after inflation became a political issue did the ‌Democrats rename “Build Back Better” the ‌”Inflation Reduction ‌Act.” It still contained all the historic spending, corporate welfare, price-fixing, and tax hikes, but,‌ more importantly, it also still ⁣had absolutely nothing to do with mitigating inflation.

Let’s⁣ not forget that “Bidenomics” also helped initiate the highest gas prices in history. The president ​signed a slew of executive orders pausing government leases on public lands, shutting ‌down the Keystone XL pipeline, and stymieing drilling in the Gulf of Mexico over concocted “social cost of carbon” externalities, among other restrictions. Despite ⁣the uncertainty of the post-pandemic economy, all of this was‍ done ⁤in the first weeks of his administration.

None of this is ⁣to even mention the hundreds of billions “Bidenomics” “invested” — the ⁣enduring euphemism for spending money we don’t ⁣have — in social engineering projects that would ⁤force us to abandon modernity in the name of “climate justice.” This brand of spending was based on a​ (misguided) moral prerogative, not any ⁤kind of prudent economic decision making, to say the ⁤least.

A writer in the New Yorker ⁢recently asked, “Why Isn’t‍ Joe Biden Getting More Credit for a Big Drop in Inflation?” Probably because there⁤ is no “Bidenomics” policy that has helped lower inflation. Quite the opposite. We’re still trying to recover from​ the president’s economic policy. It’s the Fed⁢ that was‌ compelled to hike interest rates at​ a level not‍ seen in 30 ⁢years to inhibit economic growth partly due to government-induced ​inflation. It, not Biden, brought down inflation.

Presidents who oversee strong economies, often benefitting⁤ from the luck of history or existing policies, will see fewer jobs “created” during their terms because space for growth is limited. Biden was given more economic headroom than any president ‍in ⁣history — and blew it. That’s the real legacy of “Bidenomics.”