The epoch times

McCarthy’s office won’t blindly approve Biden’s $24 billion request for Ukraine.

President Joe Biden’s $40 million supplemental funding request faces⁢ two hurdles in⁤ Congress—the whopping price tag for‌ additional federal spending items and the inclusion of an extra⁣ $24 billion in aid to Ukraine.

Some Republicans​ in both houses have said the request will be challenged‍ on Capitol Hill.

The request was made⁣ via⁢ a letter from Shalanda Young, director of the Office of ‌Management ⁢and‍ Budget, ⁤to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and‍ other congressional leaders on Aug. 10.

A spokesman for Mr. ⁣McCarthy told The Epoch Times the⁤ bill would not gain automatic approval in⁤ the House.

“A Republican-led House will not rubber-stamp any blank-check funding requests; rather, ‍the Administration’s emergency funding requests must be reviewed⁣ and scrutinized on ⁤their⁤ merits consistent with⁢ the practice and​ principles of our majority,” the spokesman said.

That​ Republican majority fought⁣ to ⁢reduce federal spending⁢ in 2024 and impose a⁣ 1​ percent cap on spending ‌growth for ⁤10 years in a ‍compromise negotiated in June by Mr. McCarthy and President Biden. Even that apparent⁢ victory did not satisfy the most conservative House Republicans, who ‍fought the McCarthy-Biden agreement believing⁢ that it did ⁣not‌ do enough to reduce deficit spending.

The request includes $13.1‍ billion in ⁤military aid for Ukraine and $8.5 billion in economic and humanitarian relief.⁤ Aid for Ukraine has increasingly been⁢ questioned by some in Congress‍ as that country’s war to repel ⁤the Russian invasion nears⁣ the end of ‍a second summer with⁢ no U.S. exit strategy in place.

The president also requested $12 billion ⁤to replenish the federal Disaster Relief ⁤Fund, $3.3 billion to counter China’s influence in developing countries, $4 million for border security, ‍services for illegal immigrants, ​and to combat the flow of‌ fentanyl into ⁤the country.

Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) speaks during a television interview in the Senate Russell Office Building‍ in Washington‍ on Oct. 20, 2020. ‍(Stefani Reynolds/Getty​ Images)

Lawmakers React

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) ‌led the charge of criticism, accusing⁣ President Biden of political manipulation by ‍combining the request ⁤for⁤ additional aid to Ukraine with ⁤approval of domestic disaster⁣ relief funds. Florida⁣ lawmakers on both sides ⁣of the aisle had already requested adding $11.5 billion to the DRF.

“President Biden ​owes ‌Americans an explanation of his ‌strategy, something he’s refused ⁤to do since Putin invaded Ukraine.⁢ We’ve seen incredible‌ bravery⁤ by the Ukrainians ⁢over the last⁤ 18 months, but we’ve ​also seen U.S. stockpiles⁤ dwindle, European countries ‍slow-walk critical​ supplies, ‌and China grow‍ more aggressive towards the⁤ U.S. and our national⁣ interests. ​We cannot give a blank check to continue the status quo,” Mr. Rubio said in a statement released on Aug. 10.

Sen. Mike Braun ‌(R-Ind.) has been a critic of the administration’s‍ focus on Ukraine and ‍the⁢ seeming lack​ of attention to‍ inflation and other matters​ directly affecting Americans. In response to President Biden’s funding request, a Braun staffer pointed to ‍the senator’s July 14 op-ed published in The Hill.

Mr. Braun wrote that the real ⁤question to ask is, “What is ⁣the endgame here? Our $100 billion‍ contribution has already⁣ eclipsed Russia’s entire⁤ military budget. When⁤ that⁤ number‌ hits $200 ⁣billion, $300 billion, or a trillion ⁣dollars, will we ⁢just keep paying?”

A number of House Republicans were also skeptical of ​sending more aid to Ukraine without⁤ an end⁤ in sight.

“Americans are struggling to pay for basic necessities, and our national credit rating just got downgraded for the second time in U.S. history.‌ Yet this⁣ president wants ‌to send $24 billion of our⁣ taxpayers’ money to⁤ Ukraine, a country‍ we’ve already granted over $113 billion in unchecked assistance? I ​don’t think so,” Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) told The Epoch Times.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who led opposition to the ⁢spending compromise‌ negotiated⁣ with President Biden,‌ was even more direct.⁢ “No. This should be a ‍non-starter for the @HouseGOP. It’s time to⁤ stand ‌up for Americans and against the uniparty. #NoSecurityNoFunding,”​ he wrote in an​ Aug. 10 ‍post on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Eleven other House Republicans, led by Rep. Warren Davidson⁤ (R-Ohio), wrote‍ to ⁢President Biden on Aug. 11, stating their opposition to the⁢ additional spending ‌and ⁤demanding that he clarify his intention for ⁤the Ukraine conflict.

Rep. Warren Davidson⁢ (R-Ohio). (Courtesy of Congressman ​Warren Davidson’s‌ Office)

“Americans are‌ tired of funding endless wars and​ want policies that not ⁢only help restore fiscal sanity‌ in Washington but also put​ America ⁢and American citizens⁢ first,” the group ⁢wrote.

“Before Congress can ⁤responsibly finance the ongoing proxy‌ war in ⁤Ukraine, the Biden administration must provide a clear strategy and endgame​ for ⁢our involvement,”‍ they added.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker