The epoch times

California’s wildlife bears the cost of green energy.

California’s Transition to Green Energy Raises Concerns ⁢for Wildlife

As the Golden State accelerates its transition to green energy at full throttle, ​some‌ are expressing⁤ apprehension about the potential consequences⁢ for the⁤ state. John Baker, a retired assistant chief of the California Fish and Wildlife‍ Department, believes that while‍ the push for green ​energy is aimed at saving ‍the ⁤planet from climate ‍change, it comes ​at the expense of⁣ endangering groups of wild animals, especially birds.

The ‍Impact on Predatory Birds

Baker​ highlights the significant ​impact of green energy policies on predatory birds such as eagles, ​hawks, and falcons. Many of these birds are being⁢ killed by wind turbines, which poses a ​threat to their populations due to their slow reproductive nature.

“There are millions of finches out there, but there​ are not millions of ⁣golden eagles out there,” ‍Baker said.

According‍ to a 2021 article, approximately 681,000⁤ birds are killed each year in the United States by wind ‍turbines. However, this number could ‌be even higher due to limited monitoring ‍and other factors.

The Impact on Other ​Species

Solar farms, another major green energy generator, have also ⁤been causing harm to ⁣birds and other⁤ species. Birds often mistake the⁤ shining solar panels for pools of water and ‌crash into them, resulting in fatal injuries. The extreme heat from the panels⁣ can also incinerate birds that fly too close. Additionally, solar ‌farms have disrupted the habitat and ​migration⁣ corridors of land ⁤species like desert tortoises and bighorn sheep.

Lack of Accountability

Baker criticizes the lack of accountability⁤ for ‍wind​ energy operators when it comes ⁤to the loss⁤ of wildlife. While harming birds like bald ​eagles can lead to criminal charges, wind energy ⁢operators are often not held⁢ responsible for the ⁤harm they⁢ cause to wildlife.

The⁣ Influence of Politics

Baker ‍also raises concerns ⁣about the influence of‍ politics​ on the decision-making process. He believes that scientists are pressured to align their research with a specific narrative‌ to secure funding, sometimes neglecting the⁢ well-being‌ of individual species. This preferential treatment for⁢ clean energy can ‍hinder‍ scientific progress and the protection of wildlife.

Despite ‍these challenges, Baker acknowledges‍ that some local ⁤agencies⁤ have found​ ways to work around⁤ these situations and prioritize the well-being‌ of ⁢wildlife.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker