Conservative News Daily

Trump’s legal team opposes Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 trial plans, seeks a ‘fairer’ schedule.

Trump Legal Team Fights Back Against Jan. 6 Trial Plans, Files for ‘More Reasonable’ Schedule

In response to ⁤the Department of Justice’s‌ suggested start⁢ date⁢ of Jan. 2, 2024‍ — in the middle of ⁢a presidential ⁣election that’s sure to make‍ history, no matter how⁣ it goes — for former President Donald‍ Trump’s alleged ⁤efforts to prevent a‍ transfer of power from himself to President-elect ⁤Joe Biden in the aftermath of the contentious‌ 2020 election, Trump’s‌ legal team has‌ put forth a⁤ schedule ‌that it⁢ considers “more reasonable.”

Instead of a trial date in the middle of the election, Trump’s attorneys⁢ have​ suggested that ​jury selection not begin until more than two years later — in April of 2026.

Much‍ of their reasoning behind the later date has to do with the amount​ of time the ​federal ‌government has spend investigating the former president and the huge volume of records it has submitted to the court as evidence.

“This more reasonable schedule ‌— equal to the government’s time spent investigating — will allow this case to ⁣proceed in an orderly fashion, with both parties having a fair opportunity to ‍review‌ all material information, advance appropriate motions, and apprise the Court of relevant ⁣legal issues,” the document, titled “Response in Opposition to Government’s Proposed ⁤Trial Calendar” said.

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team has already provided 11.5 million ​pages of discovery material to the⁢ defendant’s team,​ with more possibly to come in the future.

“Nonetheless, even assuming we could begin reviewing the documents today, we ⁢would need to proceed at a pace of 99,762 pages per⁣ day to finish the government’s initial production⁢ by its​ proposed date for jury selection,” Trump’s ​team⁣ said, trying to make that enormous⁤ number comprehensible. “That is⁣ the entirety of Tolstoy’s War and Peace, cover to cover, 78 times a day, every day, from ⁢now⁤ until jury ‌selection.”

In addition, Trump is involved in a number of ‌other legal proceedings that will require his time ⁣and presence, ⁢ The Hill pointed out.

“Trump already has a ⁢packed court schedule as well, with‌ a New ​York civil ⁢trial scheduled ‌for October, a defamation trial scheduled for January, a New York criminal‍ case scheduled ⁣for March and a federal case in Florida scheduled for May,”⁤ the outlet reported. “Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has also asked for a March trial date ‌after a grand jury handed up‌ an ‌indictment against the former president and 18 others earlier this week‌ over their efforts to ‍overturn the⁢ 2020 election results in Georgia.”

Arguing for a trial date at the beginning of next year, prosecutors seemed to indicate that they felt it⁢ was important⁣ for​ the court’s ultimate decision to be rendered prior to the next presidential ​election, presumably because it‌ could influence some voters.

“[A] January 2 trial date would vindicate the public’s strong interest in a speedy trial — an⁢ interest ‌guaranteed by the Constitution and federal law in all ⁣cases, but of particular significance here, where the defendant, a⁤ former president, is charged with ⁣conspiring to overturn the legitimate ⁣results of the 2020 presidential election, obstruct the certification of the election results, and discount citizens’ legitimate votes,”⁢ they said, according⁤ to The Hill.

Trump’s team agreed with⁣ the importance of a speedy trial, ⁤but argued for ⁢a ⁢different definition⁣ of “speedy.”

“The government’s objective is clear:⁢ to deny President Trump and ‍his counsel a fair ability to prepare for trial,” they argued in the filing. “The Court should deny​ the government’s request. The public interest lies in justice and fair ⁤trial, not a rush to⁣ judgment. Moreover,⁤ if the rights to due process⁢ and counsel are to​ mean anything, a defendant ‍must​ have adequate time to defend‍ himself.”

“Even under our Proposed Schedule, we would need‌ to review ⁢approximately 12,000 pages per day to complete a first pass of the initial production​ by our proposed trial date,” the defense team reasoned.

You can read ⁣the entire 16-page court filing here:

gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.30.0_1 by⁢ The ​Western Journal on​ Scribd

“The Proposed Schedule appropriately ​balances President Trump’s constitutional and statutory rights to counsel and ‌a​ fair trial with⁣ the public’s need for promptness,” ​the‍ arguments concluded.

No date has yet been announced as to when a trial schedule will ‌be​ decided upon.

The ⁣post Trump⁢ Legal Team Fights ⁤Back Against Jack Smith’s⁢ Jan. 6 Trial Plans, Files ⁤for‌ ‘More Reasonable’ Schedule appeared first⁤ on The ⁣Western Journal.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker