Invalidating Trump’s presidency through a distorted interpretation of the 14th Amendment lacks legal merit.
Is Trump Constitutionally Disqualified from Serving as President?
Despite four indictments and two previous impeachments, Donald Trump remains a strong contender in the Republican primaries and is even running equal with President Biden in some polls. However, a theory defended by legal scholars suggests that Trump may be constitutionally disqualified from holding federal office.
According to Professors Michael Paulsen and Will Baude, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution would disqualify Trump from serving as president, even if he secures enough electoral votes to win the presidency. This theory has been seconded by former Judge Michael Luttig and Professor Laurence Tribe. While their interpretation of the Constitution’s insurrection clause seems correct, they are mistaken in believing that anyone has the right to strike Trump from the ballot.
The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, deals with the treatment of former officials who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. Although it was originally intended for Confederates, its text has continuing relevance to any future insurrection or rebellion. This includes the presidency, as other constitutional texts referring to ”officers” support this interpretation.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
The distinction between “rebellion” and “insurrection” is important. In the Prize Cases (1863), the Supreme Court defined insurrection as political violence at a level lower or less organized than an organized rebellion. While some argue that Trump was an “insurrectionist,” there is no unanimous agreement among the American people. A CBS poll showed that almost half of the respondents rejected the claim that the events of January 6 were an actual insurrection.
Furthermore, the failure of the Justice Department to charge Trump with insurrection and the Senate’s acquittal in the second impeachment raise doubts about the academic theory of disqualification. It is unfair to require Trump to prove his innocence without any definitive finding by a federal authority.
The Electoral College Chooses Presidents, Not State Officials
If the academic view were correct, it would create chaos in our electoral system. The Electoral College system decentralizes the selection of the president, with state legislatures deciding the manner for choosing electors. Allowing state officials to unilaterally find insurrection and eliminate candidates for federal office goes against the principles of federalism and could potentially sway the outcome of a close race.
Chief Justice John Marshall’s observation in McCullough v. Maryland that “the power to tax is the power to destroy” applies here. Allowing single state officials to decide the eligibility of candidates undermines the uniformity and national character that the framers sought to ensure.
Congress Has Other Means of Enforcement
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment provides means of enforcement, but it does not grant every official the power to enforce it. Each branch of the federal government can honor Section 3 in the course of executing its constitutional functions. Congress could pass a statute disqualifying insurrectionists from office or establish a specialized tribunal for handling insurrection cases. Ultimately, federal courts will have the final say.
While holding Trump accountable for his actions is important, it should not depend on warping our constitutional system. Prosecutors should charge him with insurrection if they can prove it, and Congress should disqualify him if they agree he committed the crime. Ultimately, the American people will decide Trump’s responsibility for the events of January 6 at the ballot box in the 2024 elections.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...