The epoch times

Pollster says having 8 people on stage is a group interview, not a debate.

News⁤ Analysis

Televised presidential debates, like ‍the Trump-absent Republican debate on Wednesday, have ⁣been historically viewed as a showcase for voters wanting‍ to hear a candidate’s response​ to‍ policy questions or sometimes outright attacks. But the format hasn’t changed significantly since‌ the ​first televised Nixon-Kennedy debate almost 63 years to the day ⁢in ​1960, with one exception. ‌There ‌are now more⁢ people on the ⁢stage than ever. But in ‌the‍ age⁢ of ‌social media and ‍instant analysis, does the televised political‌ debate format need a reboot?

In a ‌general election debate that pits Democrat versus Republican, or Democrat versus Republican ⁣versus Independent, policy usually is the⁣ focus. But in large primary ​debates, it‌ tends to be less about policy and more ⁣about character and personalities. This leads‍ to the question: When you simultaneously⁢ put eight people ‍on a stage,‍ can you still call it a debate?

Ryan Munce, a president and partner of‌ the polling‌ firm⁤ co/efficient, who was in ⁤the ⁣audience for ​the Republican debate in Milwaukee on Wednesday, told the Epoch Times the answer is “no.”

“It kind of ​does, in⁣ many ways, bother me that​ we‍ still call them debates.‌ They ⁤aren’t. They’re group interviews and I really think people would rather see ⁣a debate,” he said. “It’s ​an⁢ untenable exercise to ⁤have a debate with eight or ‌12 people⁢ and a silly ⁤threshold that when you need to have only 1 percent support in a couple of polls, that allows you to be on the national​ stage. I’d love ⁣to ​see a smaller group and a true ⁤debate-style format.”

Nearly 12.8 million⁢ people watched the Fox News ⁤Republican primary debate Wednesday night, a significant number ​for a cable-only show but well below the 24 million who watched‌ the first of the Republican primary debates ‍eight years ago.

Leonie ⁤Huddy, a Professor of Political Science⁣ at the State⁤ University⁣ of New York at Stony​ Brook who studies political behavior, ‌told the Epoch Times that she believes⁢ the format, ​regardless⁣ of viewership size, ⁣has survived, and TV ratings can no ⁢longer measure total audience engagement.

“There are some⁤ indications that the recent Republican​ debate attracted ⁣an⁤ unexpectedly large audience,” she said. “In many ways,‌ social media ‍makes ⁤it easier now than in the past to watch a ‌televised debate. It can be watched in⁢ many⁢ different⁤ formats, diverse settings, and via innumerable⁤ online⁤ sources. Of course, politics⁤ is not ⁣for everyone. It is important to remember that at ⁣least two-thirds ⁣of‌ eligible Americans fail ‍to vote in a presidential ‌election and find politics incredibly uninteresting.”

At the ⁢beginning of these⁤ televised political spectacles, with limited television channels and​ no social media, these live debates were, at​ times, the first opportunity for a voter ‌to meet a candidate. But now, with candidates ⁢all over Facebook, Instagram, ​YouTube, and TikTok, are voters’ minds already made up before the ​debates?

Post-election ‍surveys conducted by Pew Research Center from 1988 to 2020 found that in⁢ most cases, three-fifths or more voters said the debates⁣ were very or somewhat helpful ⁤in⁤ deciding which candidate to vote for. Pew ‍points to 1992 as the outlier, when 70 percent of voters said the three-way‍ debates that year ⁣between Bill Clinton, ⁤George ​H.W. Bush, and Ross Perot were “at least⁣ somewhat helpful.” That compares to the 2016 race when Pew polls found only 10 percent ⁢of voters said they had definitively made‍ up their minds “during or just after” ‍the presidential debates.

Ms. Huddy says that though multiple⁣ channels are available for voters to learn about ​candidates, the televised debates still hold their attention. “There is a lot of constant⁢ information out ⁣there ‌about political candidates, but many people do not tune into ⁢an election until the first debate. ⁣The⁢ debates are likely to ‌be ⁣most important in presidential elections.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker