Washington Examiner

Amy Coney Barrett embraces public scrutiny of Supreme Court, unfazed by criticism.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett Embraces ⁣Public ⁣Scrutiny⁣ of Supreme Court

Justice Amy⁣ Coney Barrett made it clear that she welcomes public scrutiny of the Supreme Court, emphasizing that it ⁢is not a new phenomenon. Since her appointment to the bench ⁣in ​2020‌ by ⁤former President Donald Trump, Barrett has developed⁤ a “thick ⁢skin”⁤ to‌ handle criticism.

During an interview ‍at the 7th ⁢Circuit Judicial Conference in Wisconsin, Barrett,​ who is still relatively new to the high court, ⁢acknowledged ‌that criticism is to be expected for jurists. She⁣ reminded ⁤everyone that justices and judges are public figures, and public criticism is part of the⁣ job.

“Justices and all‌ judges are public figures and public criticism comes with the​ job,” Barrett‍ stated.

Barrett expressed her belief that justices⁣ should ⁢not​ be easily recognizable in today’s world, unlike in the past ‌when people didn’t know who the justices were. She discussed the impact ⁢of technology, particularly⁢ push ⁢notifications on phones,‍ which constantly expose the public⁤ to ​news stories, including those about the high court.

Chief ⁢Judge Diane S. Sykes, who interviewed Barrett, did ⁤not ​delve into recent Supreme Court decisions ‍or the⁢ ethical dilemmas ​surrounding​ other justices. Instead,⁤ the ⁤focus was on Barrett’s perspective on public scrutiny and ​her experience⁣ since joining the ⁤court.

Prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court,​ Barrett served as a ‌judge on the 7th Circuit. She succeeded the late‌ Justice Ruth ⁤Bader ​Ginsburg in 2020.

“I’ve been at ​it for a⁢ couple of years⁤ now,” ⁣Barrett said. “I’ve acquired a thick skin, and I ⁢think ‍that’s​ what ⁤other figures ​have to do. I think ​that’s what all judges have to do.”

Barrett’s public appearance follows ‍recent ​discussions ⁤about ethics within the Supreme Court. Justice Elena Kagan expressed support ‍for an ethics code, ​although there is no consensus among the justices on how‌ to ‍proceed. Justice Samuel Alito has⁤ argued against​ Congress ‌imposing ‌a code of​ ethics⁤ on the high court, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor faced ⁢scrutiny for potential ​ethical ⁣violations related to ⁢her book promotions.

Overall,⁢ Barrett’s remarks highlight ⁤her willingness to embrace public scrutiny and her​ understanding of‌ the evolving challenges faced by the Supreme Court in the digital age.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker