Viktor Shokin’s interview exposes media’s reluctance to report Biden corruption.

The ‍corporate media’s reaction,⁢ or lack thereof, to ex-Ukrainian Prosecutor General ​Viktor Shokin’s ⁤Fox‍ News interview this weekend is ‌the latest proof that​ no amount of Biden corruption evidence or corroboration will⁣ deter the propaganda press from protecting their preferred political candidate.

Shokin, the man ⁣tasked with⁣ investigating Ukrainian energy⁢ company Burisma, ​admitted that ⁣he believes then-Vice President Joe Biden and his ⁣son, who was⁣ paid tens⁣ of⁢ thousands of ‌dollars every month to sit on the company’s⁢ board, were bribed in‌ exchange for ⁣his firing.

“Do you believe that Joe​ Biden ⁤or ​Hunter⁤ Biden got ⁣bribes?” asked “One Nation” host Brian Kilmeade.

“I do not want to deal in ⁢unproven⁢ facts, ‍but my personal conviction is that yes, this was the case,” Shokin said, through a translator. “They⁢ were being bribed.⁣ The fact that Joe Biden⁤ gave away $1 billion in U.S. money in‍ exchange for my dismissal, my firing, isn’t that alone a case of ⁢corruption?”

Shokin maintains that if his team was allowed to ⁣finish out the Burisma probe, “we would have found the facts about the corrupt‌ activities that they‌ were engaging ⁣in, that included both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer and others.”

“The founder and CEO of Burisma⁣ started bringing in people who could ⁢provide protection for him. ‍Hunter Biden was among them and the corruption network ​expanded ⁤as ‍a result,” Shokin explained. ​“So yes, to ⁢answer your question, there was no doubt ⁤in my mind⁣ that Burisma​ was engaged in illegal activities.”

Shokin concluded the interview by mentioning that several attempts on his life have already ‍been made.

A cursory‍ internet search shows corporate media largely⁢ ignored ​Shokin’s further confirmation of the Bidens’ ‍Burisma corruption.⁤ The handful of outlets that did mention the interview focused more on‌ discrediting Shokin than heeding his testimony. ‌

“The fired Ukrainian prosecutor is ‌not a​ reliable narrator,” The ⁢Washington Post​ alleged.

Anyone who suggests otherwise, the author notes, is siding with Republicans who “have spent ⁣years ​suggesting that Biden’s motives were actually the‍ opposite — that this was​ an effort to insulate Burisma, the Ukrainian ‌energy firm that his​ son Hunter ‌Biden worked ⁤for, from an investigation by Shokin.”

The article claimed that ⁤evidence that ⁤the elder Biden fired Shokin to protect Burisma “remains meager.” That is a lie.

Contrary to years of denials and lies from the ‍propaganda press, there‍ is‍ “overwhelming‍ evidence” ‌— even without Shokin’s corroboration ‍— that Biden leveraged his authority in the ‌Obama administration to orchestrate Shokin’s removal to⁣ benefit the company his son was being paid by.

Biden ⁢business ⁣associate Devon Archer told​ Congress earlier this month that⁣ Burisma heads expressed their desire ‍for Shokin⁣ to be fired.

The FD-1023 form ‍that ⁤the FBI⁢ desperately tried to conceal from Republican ⁤investigators also contained testimony suggesting the Burisma chief coordinated with the Bidens to kill Shokin’s ‍investigation. ​The “highly credible” confidential human source who gathered the information for the form reported that Burisma chief Mykola Zlochevsky claimed to have 17 recordings, including two of Joe Biden, that prove he “was somehow coerced into paying ⁤the Bidens⁢ to ensure Ukraine⁤ Prosecutor General‌ Viktor Shokin was⁢ fired.”

Biden himself even bragged in 2018 about ‌threatening ⁤to withhold a billion dollars in U.S. ‌loans from Petro Poroshenko, the then-president ⁢of ​Ukraine,⁢ unless Shokin was canned. That pressure came shortly after​ Biden​ gave a speech to the Ukrainian Rada explicitly ​ calling for ⁢the end of corruption, the excuse he and American corporate media ‍would ‌use for​ urging Shokin’s firing.

When his interview with Shokin aired, Kilmeade said “that‍ Viktor Shokin told ⁤him in the interview that no one had ⁤asked him for an interview despite⁣ his central role in the alleged Biden ⁣corruption scandal.” Corporate media outlets aren’t interested in‌ hearing Shokin’s testimony because his claims run counter ⁤to the ⁤Biden coverup they’re spinning.