The epoch times

All 19 defendants deny charges, skip arraignments in Georgia election case.

All ⁢19 defendants in ​Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney​ Fani​ Willis’s 2020 election probe have pleaded‌ not guilty to the charges against them and waived their formal ‍arraignments.

Former ​White House chief​ of staff Mark Meadows was among the final defendants‍ to enter ​a plea ‌on Sept. ⁤5,​ alongside former‌ Trump attorney ⁣John Eastman and former Coffee County⁣ election official Misty Hampton.

Former⁣ Coffee⁢ County GOP⁢ Chair Cathy Latham ‌entered her plea on Sept. 4,‌ while former Georgia ⁤GOP Chair David Shafer ⁢and Georgia State Sen. Shawn Still⁢ entered theirs ‌on Sept. 3. Former Justice‌ Department official ‌Jeffrey Clark’s plea was ⁢submitted on Sept. 1.

Related Stories

In total, 41 charges have‍ been filed against the defendants, including violation of Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer, impersonating a public officer, and forgery, among others.

The Aug. 14 indictment alleges that‌ President Donald Trump and the other co-defendants engaged in a conspiracy to‍ “unlawfully change the outcome” of Georgia’s ‌2020 presidential election.

President Trump pleaded‍ not ⁤guilty on⁤ Aug. 31 to the 13 charges he is facing.

Removal Decision Pending

​Mr. Meadows, who was charged with violating the state’s RICO Act‌ and soliciting violation⁢ of oath‍ by a public officer, is one​ of a⁤ handful​ of defendants ‌seeking to have their cases removed to federal court.

According to the 98-page indictment, the ⁣former White House official’s role in the alleged racketeering conspiracy was coordinating and ‍attending meetings to⁣ strategize ways to disrupt and delay the counting of the ⁣electoral votes ‌on Jan. ⁤6, 2021.

The ⁢document ‌also claims that​ he pressured⁢ an investigator​ in ​the Georgia secretary of state’s office​ to speed up ​the ⁣Fulton County signature ⁣verification process and​ that he participated in a ⁣phone call in⁣ which President Trump urged Georgia Secretary of State​ Brad Raffensperger​ to “find” evidence of determinative voter fraud ‍in⁤ the election.

In filing ⁢the notice of removal, Mr. Meadows’s legal team noted that the actions he had been indicted for were performed in his capacity as a federal official. As ⁤such, they argued⁤ that the ⁣case‍ should either be ⁤dismissed or tried in​ a⁣ federal court.

U.S. District Judge Steve C.⁢ Jones ⁣of the Northern⁢ District of Georgia‌ held a hearing on the⁤ matter on‌ Aug. 28, during which‍ he heard several hours of testimony from Mr. Meadows,⁣ Mr. Raffensperger, and other witnesses.

After⁤ the hearing, ⁤the‌ Obama-appointed judge ordered the defense and prosecution ⁣to brief him on whether he could ⁣hear the case in ‌federal court ‍if it was determined that “at least one (but not all) of ‍the ​overt ⁢acts” of⁣ which Mr. Meadows stands accused had occurred “under ‍the color of” his office.

Prosecutors responded that such a ⁤finding would not be‍ sufficient to authorize removal because Mr. Meadows’s prosecution was not‍ due‌ to any singular ⁣“overt act” but rather because he “knowingly and willfully entered into ‌an ‌agreement to violate the Georgia RICO‌ Act.”

‍ “The defendant is charged in Count 1 with agreeing to join a conspiracy that planned ‍to overturn the lawful results of⁣ an‍ election in Georgia,” prosecutors wrote in an Aug. 31 filing (pdf). “A scenario ‌where‍ at least ‍one, but not all, of the overt⁢ acts ⁤attributed to ⁤the defendant in⁢ Count 1 of ⁤the Indictment ‍occurred under color of office‍ … would not demonstrate that his agreement to⁣ join⁣ in the RICO conspiracy described in Count 1 was an act ‌‘for ⁣or related to’ his duties ‌as Chief of Staff.”

⁣⁣ But Mr. Meadows’ attorneys noted that, under the ​ Federal‌ Officer Removal‌ Statute,​ civil lawsuits ⁤or criminal prosecutions against ‍or directed ​to ‌federal officers may be removed to⁤ the appropriate ⁣U.S. district court ⁢“for ​or relating to any act under color of [federal] office.”

Ms.⁤ Willis ‍had initially proposed March 4, 2024—the day before⁢ Super‍ Tuesday—as the trial start ⁤date⁢ for all defendants. But as the former president is also a current presidential⁢ candidate, he objected to that date.

Fellow defendant⁢ Kenneth Chesebro also objected, demanding a speedy​ trial, so Judge Scott⁣ McAfee approved a Nov. 3 trial date for Mr. Chesebro only.

⁤ ‍As other defendants are expected to follow suit, Ms. Willis​ alternati



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker