Conservative backers respond to AG Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial.
Dozens of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s supporters showed up to witness the beginning of the Senate impeachment trial at the Capitol in Austin, Texas, earlier this week.
It has been over 100 years since a sitting official was impeached in the state of Texas, and some of Mr. Paxton’s supporters believe the accusations are reminiscent of the actions taken against former President Donald Trump over the past several years.
“I think they’re convicting [Paxton] of their own crimes,” Melissa Fryzel of Seguin, Texas, told The Epoch Times during an interview at the Capitol on Tuesday. “I mean, that’s what we see all over and what we see at the national level. Just like with Trump, they accuse him of the things that they’re doing.”
Ms. Fryzel said she has been a GOP political activist since 2018 and has been attending each day of the trial.
House impeachment managers have accused the attorney general of misusing his office to help campaign donor and Austin real estate investor Nate Paul, whose Austin home and business, World Class Holdings, were raided by the FBI in August 2019.
Rebecca Broughton, who attended the trial on Tuesday, told The Epoch Times that the whole matter has been “rush, rush, rush” to “get Ken Paxton out of here.”
“He was doing so good for the conservative values,” she said, adding that he was pushing back against the Biden administration to secure the border and to protect Texans and everyone in the country.
A jury of 30 of the 31 senators will determine whether the attorney general will be removed from office. Mr. Paxton’s wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, is barred from voting. A two-thirds threshold of 21 votes per article is needed to convict the state’s top lawyer.
“I really think [the impeachment trial] is sad for Texas,” Ms. Broughton said. “It’s really sad for Texas because all these people are doing is saying your vote does not count.”
Mr. Paxton is the 51st attorney general of Texas and first took office in January 2015. He was reelected to a third term in November 2022 after defeating George P. Bush in the primary.
Pretrial Motions Rejected
On Tuesday, the senators rejected all of Mr. Paxton’s pretrial motions to dismiss the impeachment articles.
Brian L. Owsley, associate professor of law at the University of North Texas at Dallas, told The Epoch Times that he believes dismissing the articles would have been unfavorable considering the trial’s attention.
“On some level, the time to short-circuit the impeachment would have been prior to convening the trial,” Mr. Owsley said. “It is not a good look after the attention this impeachment trial had to forgo having the trial.”
Mr. Owsley added that the trial is a “political process” that puts the Republican senators in a difficult position.
“The senators are supposed to listen and consider only the evidence, but as political animals, they are cognizant of polls and their constituents’ views,” he said. “Many of them do not like Paxton, but their constituents voted for him and still support him.”
Mr. Paxton, who is suspended from office, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to all 20 articles of impeachment against him. He has been absent from the Senate chamber-turned-courtroom since the second half of the first day of the trial.
“I want to thank you all for your prayers and support. I will never back down from defending freedom,” he wrote on X later that day.
‘Isn’t It Ironic?’
The House impeachment managers accused Mr. Paxton of intervening in a 2020 lawsuit involving the Mitte Foundation, a charitable organization that provides scholarships to students in Texas, against his deputies’ recommendations, according to the first article of impeachment (pdf).
The document states that the foundation invested over $3 million in Mr. Paul’s real estate development companies in 2011 in order to “grow its money to provide more scholarships.” World Class met its obligations to provide quarterly and annual financial reports until the third quarter of 2018. At that point, Mitte filed a lawsuit against World Class.
Mr. Paul allegedly agreed to buy out the foundation’s partnership in a $10 million settlement, which he ultimately failed to pay. Mitte took the company back to court, according to the impeachment article.
The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) Charitable Trust Division was notified and conducted an investigation consistent with its duty to protect charitable organizations. The OAG determined it would not “intervene” but would reconsider if “additional parties or causes of action” were added.
The House impeachment managers claimed that Mr. Paul, who had donated $25,000 to Mr. Paxton’s campaign in 2018, allegedly went to his “friend” for help with the situation, according to the House impeachment committee.
But Paxton attorney Tony Buzbee pointed out that Mr. Paxton’s office got involved after an additional inquiry regarding Mitte was sent to the OAG.
In late September 2020, a group of top deputies from Mr. Paxton’s agency, including first assistant Jeff Mateer, told the FBI that Mr. Paxton had ignored their advice by getting involved in the case. They also claimed that Mr. Paxton hired an outside lawyer to probe the FBI raid on Mr. Paul.
In return for Mr. Paul’s alleged assistance from the OAG, the former employees—all of whom were later either fired or resigned—claimed that Mr. Paul helped hide Mr. Paxton’s extramarital affair and even hired the woman with whom Mr. Paxton was allegedly involved to work for his company.
They also said that Mr. Paul paid for renovations at the Paxtons’ home in Austin.
Mr. Mateer testified that he believed his boss’s actions were illegal, and that was why he and the others from the OAG went to the FBI with their accusations. Mr. Mateer resigned the following day.
However, during Mr. Buzbee’s cross-examination on Wednesday, Mr. Mateer admitted that he and his colleagues had approved of Mr. Paxton’s office getting involved in the Mitte case.
“I approved the executive memorandum,” Mr. Mateer told Mr. Buzbee in response to whether he was involved in the Mitte intervention.
“Isn’t it ironic that the first witness called in this case for the House on the first article of impeachment that was passed, that this witness—you [Mr. Mateer]—approved that intervention?” Mr. Buzbee replied.
“Isn’t that ironic? Don’t you think that kind of reflects the whole House’s case?”
The federal investigation into the allegations against Mr. Paxton did not result in any charges.
Mr. Mateer, who describes himself as a Christian conservative lawyer, was once nominated by former President Trump to a federal judgeship. But his nomination was later withdrawn after U.S. senators learned that Mr. Mateer had made comments in 2015 that he believed transgender children were “Satan’s spawn” and supported a judge’s right to support certain types of discrimination, The Texas Tribune reported in 2017.
Mr. Paxton has been a staunch s
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...