The epoch times

Nobel laureate challenges climate change narrative, highlights overlooked factor.

Nobel ⁢Prize laureate John Clauser‌ has recently been in the‌ spotlight for⁣ challenging ​prevailing ‍climate models, which he ‍says⁣ have ‍ignored a key variable.

Mr. Clauser, who recently became a​ recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize‍ in⁣ Physics for‌ his contributions to ⁢quantum mechanics, holds degrees from Caltech and Columbia University. He served in roles⁤ at ⁢Lawrence Berkeley​ National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National‍ Laboratory,‌ and the University of California, Berkeley. In ‌2010, he⁢ was honored with ​a portion of the Wolf ‍Prize in Physics.

Recently, Mr. Clauser joined another Nobel laureate and over 1,600 professionals in‌ signing the World Climate Declaration ⁢(WCD) organized ⁣by⁣ Climate‌ Intelligence (CLINTEL). This declaration​ asserts that there is‌ no “climate emergency,” that climate change science is not ‌conclusive, and that ‍the earth’s history ⁤over⁤ thousands of years shows a consistently changing climate.

The WCD highlights ⁢the ⁤limitations ⁣of current climate⁢ models, stating they overemphasize the impact of greenhouse ‍gases like carbon ​dioxide (CO2). “In addition, [climate models] ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with ⁤CO2 is beneficial,”‍ the WCD reads, in ‌part.

The⁤ declaration further notes that⁢ both natural and human⁤ activities contribute to climate change and the actual warming observed is ⁣less than as predicted by‍ the climate models, revealing our incomplete understanding of climate change.

In an interview with ‍The Epoch Times’s “American Thought Leaders,” Mr. Clauser voiced his reservations about‌ current ​climate research quality⁣ and contends that U.S. climate​ policies⁢ are misguided.

Clouds

Prominent ​climate reports, such as those by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), National Academy of⁤ Sciences, and‌ the Royal Society,‌ emphasize the ⁢role of CO2 ⁤but miss the mark⁣ on the critical role of clouds in the climate system, according⁣ to Mr. Clauser.

His‌ curiosity about​ clouds began ⁤as a sailboat racer. ​He recalled, “I raced across the Pacific Ocean at least a dozen times. I had set up the boat with solar panels to⁢ charge the ‌batteries. … I had an ⁤ammeter‍ on‍ the power output‍ from the solar panels,‍ and I⁣ noticed every time we sailed under a cloud, the output from the solar panels dropped ​by⁣ 50 percent to ⁤half of its value that it was, and then we came out from behind the cloud and boom, their power went back up. And I thought, ‘I wonder why it’s just about a factor of ⁤two.'”

“This is⁣ how I became ​very curious as to how clouds work. When the climate issues came along, I very quickly realized that cloud cover has a profound effect on the earth’s heat input that ​the clouds are reflecting a ‌massive amount of light back out into space.

“And so I read all of‍ the various ⁤IPCC reports, ⁣National⁢ Academy reports on this,”⁤ he continued. “As a physicist, I’d worked at some excellent institutions—⁣ Caltech, Columbia, Cal Berkeley—where very careful science‍ needed to be done.‍ And⁢ reading these​ reports, I was appalled⁣ at⁤ how sloppy the work was. And in​ particular, ​it was very obvious, even ‍in the earliest reports, and all carried​ on through to the present, that clouds were not ​at all understood. …⁢ It’s just simply bad science.”

Mr. ​Clauser highlighted insights ​from former President Barack ⁣Obama’s science adviser, Steve Koonin. In Mr. Koonin’s book, “Unsettled: What⁤ Climate Science Tells Us, What ⁢It⁢ Doesn’t, and⁣ Why It Matters,” the‍ author noted⁣ the inconsistency of ⁣the ⁣IPCC’s 40 computer models, emphasizing their inability​ to explain the past century’s climate ⁣and suggesting that these models lack a‌ crucial‌ piece‌ of⁢ physics.

Clouds pictured in Guna Yala Comarca, Panama, near ​the island of⁢ Carti Sugtupu in the Caribbean Sea, on Aug.‌ 28, 2023. ⁢(Luis Acosta/AFP ‌via Getty Images)

‘The Missing Piece’

Mr. Clauser said⁢ he believes he has ‍identified a significant oversight in prevailing climate models.

“I believe ⁢I have​ the missing piece ⁣of the puzzle that has ⁣been left out in​ virtually all of these computer programs,” he stated. “And that is the effect of clouds.”

While many theories​ of anthropogenic ‍climate‍ change focus primarily⁣ on the impact of human-produced CO2, Mr. Clauser argues that these models‌ overlook the significance ⁢of cloud dynamics.

He referenced the 2003 National ⁢Academy report, ⁤which, he said, “totally admitted”​ its lack of understanding about clouds, and made “a whole ‌series of mistaken statements‍ regarding the effects of clouds.”

Drawing​ attention to Al Gore’s film, “The Inconvenient Truth,” Mr. ⁢Clauser noted, “[Mr. Gore] insists on talking about a‍ cloud-free earth‍ … That’s a totally‍ artificial Earth.” According​ to Mr. Clauser, this cloudless portrayal of the‍ earth reflects the approach taken by many in ⁤the climate‍ science community.

“That’s a totally artificial Earth. It is⁣ a totally artificial ‍case for using a ⁢model, and this is pretty much what the IPCC and ‍others use—a cloud free earth.”

Mr. Clauser pointed out that satellite images ⁤consistently show wide variances in cloud cover, which can⁣ span anywhere from five to 95 percent of ‌the Earth’s⁤ surface.

“The cloud⁤ cover fraction fluctuates quite dramatically ⁢on‍ daily ⁢weekly timescales. We call this weather.‌ You can’t have weather⁣ without having clouds,” ⁤he said.

A photo of planet Earth from‌ NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) on the⁣ DSCOVR satellite ​on Sept. 11, ⁢2018. (NASA Earth Observatory)

Effect of Clouds Compared to ‌CO2

Clouds play a paramount role ⁤in regulating the Earth’s temperature, serving as a “cloud-sunlight-reflectivity thermostat” that “controls the climate, controls the temperature‍ of the earth, and stabilizes it ⁤very powerfully and ‌very dramatically,” asserts Mr. Clauser.

With⁣ two-thirds of the ⁣Earth being oceanic, the ocean becomes ⁤instrumental ⁢in cloud formation, he ⁤said.

Minimal clouds result in⁣ heightened sunlight ⁣exposure to the ocean, triggering increased evaporation and subsequent cloud formation, resulting in ⁤more clouds. On the⁢ contrary, abundant clouds reduce this sunlight, thus‌ curbing evaporation ‍rates and ‍cloud ⁤formation, resulting in fewer clouds, Mr. Clauser explains.

This balance acts like⁢ a natural‌ thermostat for the earth’s ‍temperature, ⁤he said.

Mr. Clauser contends that this “thermostat” mechanism has a vastly greater influence on Earth’s temperature than the ⁣effect⁢ of CO2 or methane. ‍He presented to The Epoch Times preliminary calculations that suggest that the impact of this cloud-reflectivity mechanism might overshadow CO2’s influence by more than 100 or ‌even 200‌ times.

All clouds,‍ irrespective of their altitude or type, appear bright white when‍ viewed from the direction of⁢ the⁤ sun, according ⁢to Mr.‌ Clauser. They typically reflect almost 90 percent ⁢of incoming sunlight, he said. The reflectivity ⁤fraction is referred to ⁣as albedo. The​ albedo has been inaccurately ⁤kept constant ​in various climate models, Mr. Clauser argues.

He finds it⁢ baffling how these significant variations, ranging from five ‍to 95⁢ percent cloud⁤ cover,⁤ have ⁢been overlooked.

Mr. ⁤Clauser‍ further ⁣underscores that clouds ⁣are integral to ⁤weather dynamics, and yet, ⁣current climate ⁢models, whose authors “admit upfront that their‌ models​ cannot predict weather,” have been wielded to foretell drastic⁣ climatic⁢ shifts, including “climate crisis apocalypse.”

‘Very Dishonest ⁤Disinformation’

Mr. Clauser observed‌ that‌ the drive to address human-induced climate change is increasingly ​shaping political⁣ agendas​ and influencing the strategic direction of entire nations.

“The whole world is doing all of this. A lot of the pressure is actually coming from Europe, all of these various world conferences” he said, speculating much of ‍this⁢ push‌ might ‍have its​ roots in Mr. Gore’s “An ⁣Inconvenient‌ Truth,” which he feels has incorporated‍ inaccurate science.

Mr. Gore’s ⁣film claims that humanity is triggering a dire climate crisis​ that ⁣necessitates global action. But Mr. ‍Clauser contends: “‘Climate change’ is actually very dishonest disinformation that has been ⁤presented by various politicians.”

He pinpoints a 2013 ‍Physics Today article (pdf) by Jane​ Lubchenco and Thomas Karl as pivotal in shaping the narrative, ‌especially during the period when “global warming” was being rebranded as “climate change.”

“The reason that was​ given w



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker