School District prepares to oppose California AG’s attempt to conceal transgender students

California’s Battle to Protect Children from Radical Gender Ideology

California ⁣has gone to great lengths in recent months to punish the people and institutions who want to protect children from the dangers of radical gender ideology.

Chino Valley Unified ​School District, responsible for ‍nearly ⁢27,000 students in San Bernardino County, is facing ‍a state-led attack ‌for prioritizing the safety of its students ⁤and‍ their families over the political agenda of California Democrats.

The CVUSD board voted on Monday to retain ⁣the ​Liberty Justice Center, a nonprofit, public-interest litigation center, to ​defend the district against California Democrat Attorney General Rob Bonta who recently sued them over a popular parental⁣ notification policy.

The policy in⁣ question requires school staff to notify parents if their child shows symptoms⁢ of gender ​dysphoria including switching to the‍ pronouns,⁤ bathrooms, or sports ⁤teams of the opposite ‌sex.‌ The rule reinforces the idea that parents, not⁣ the state or school districts, have the final say over their children’s well-being until those kids turn 18 years old.

“The state can’t intimidate parents who⁣ have spoken loud and clear—their parental rights will not be taken away, and we won’t be ‍intimated into giving them up,” president ‍of the CVUSD Board Sonja Shaw said in‌ a statement. “We have the law on our side and look forward to our day in court ⁤as parents will ⁣be‍ watching ⁤coast to ⁢coast across the‌ nation.”

LJC says Bonta’s latest legal attack⁤ on the school district threatens local elected officials’ autonomy​ and parents’ rights, which is why its lawyers, including​ LJC Senior Counsel Emily Rae, ‌“look forward to defending‍ the propriety of ⁣this policy in court.”

“Parents ⁢have a constitutionally protected right to direct the ⁣upbringing ‍of their children. That exists above and beyond policies like this Chino Valley policy but the Chino Valley⁤ policy was enacted to just ensure that​ there are no secrets kept between the school district and the ​parents when⁢ it comes ⁣to critical information⁢ about their children’s physical, emotional,‌ and mental well-being,” Rae told ⁤The​ Federalist.

CVUSD’s journey to codifying the pro-parents ‍rule was not an easy one. ⁢Plenty of politicians and administrators including⁣ California Superintendent of Public‍ Instruction Tony Thurmond publicly opposed the ‌district’s attempts ‌to recognize parents’ rights to information about their children.

Despite Thurmond’s attempts ⁢to hamstring the board’s ⁣plans, the policy ⁢successfully passed with a‌ 4 to 1 vote in July.

Mere hours after CVUSD adopted the rule, Bonta penned a letter to the district warning that the new ⁤policy contradicted ​the California Department of Education’s guidance on gender dysphoric children. ‌Because CVUSD ignored the DOE’s recommendation to hide a child’s ⁤social transition from his or her parents, Bonta threatened to “take‍ action as appropriate to vigorously ‌protect students’ civil rights.”

After a short investigation into CVUSD, Bonta announced on Aug.⁢ 28 that he would sue the district for supposedly⁣ violating LGBT students’ civil⁤ rights and causing them “emotional, physical, and psychological ​harm.” His narrative that CVUSD was orchestrating the “forced outing” of LGBT students was quickly picked up by national Democrats and the corporate⁤ media.

Rae told The Federalist the state’s attempt to “enforce their will on this school board is inappropriate.”

“Our position is that the attorney general⁢ does not have any legal authority to bring this case, that the school district properly enacted this policy,” Rae explained.

Bonta’s request for a temporary restraining order against the policy was granted by a San Bernardino judge on Sept. 6.

The AG celebrated ‍the judge’s decision as a “significant step​ towards ensuring the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of transgender and gender-nonconforming students” but‌ CVUSD and LJC say the fight isn’t over yet.

“Schools should not be keeping secrets from parents. That’s at the ‌heart of the policy and that’s‍ what this fight is about for us. Parents have a right to know what’s going on with their children and their schools ⁤and so we’re gonna fight to make‍ sure that ⁢they continue ⁣to keep those rights,” Rae said.

The next hearing ⁤for CVUSD’s‌ case is on Oct. 13 where‌ LJC plans to argue ​that the temporary injunction “is not appropriate in this‌ case.”

Several other⁣ California school districts have either ‌passed or plan to enact similar parental ⁤notification policies like the one enacted by the CVUSD board. These districts’ attempts to protect parents’ rights also face scrutiny from Bonta, who⁤ is threatening even more lawsuits.

LJC attorneys, however, said they are ‍prepared ⁢to ‌“defend educational freedom and parents’ rights” anywhere, not just at CVUSD.

“If​ other schools are⁤ facing these kinds of‌ threats, we want to hear from them. We want to talk to them. We’re prepared⁢ to defend parents’ and students’⁤ rights all over on these issues,” LJC President Jacob Hubert told The Federalist.