The epoch times

Senate AI Forum Fails to Make Headway on Regulation

Members of Congress are leaving a high-profile closed-door forum on artificial intelligence (AI) with little ‌hope of crafting meaningful legislation to protect Americans in the next year.

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) convened the closed⁣ hearing with a veritable who’s who of tech’s rich and famous, including ⁣Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, X chairman Elon Musk, OpenAI CEO⁤ Sam Altman, and ​Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai.

The Sept. 13 AI Insight Forum, Mr. Schumer said, was ⁤designed ‍to inform Congress as to how it can best move forward in‌ setting safeguards for the development of AI.

Forum Criticized ‍for Offering No Real‍ Progress on AI

A key point of contention among those leaving the forum was Mr. Schumer’s making ⁤sweeping‍ promises that the media frenzy would help to promote some sort of ​legislative progress concerning⁤ AI regulation.

Many present, however, claimed that the⁢ meeting‌ presented little to no real progress on the development of legislation.

Sen. John​ Kennedy (R-La.) noted​ that the forum heard from 30 speakers, each‍ with only three minutes to ⁣talk. As to meaningful policy proposals, he added, there wasn’t much to speak of.

“In ⁢terms of regulatory suggestions, I⁤ didn’t hear much,” Mr. Kennedy told The Epoch ​Times.

“Do we have‍ some sort of overarching regulatory framework that ‍we’re close to agreeing on that addresses the dangers and the potential of artificial intelligence, in​ my judgment? No. We ⁤just don’t right now.”

Mr. Kennedy said that Congress⁤ has gone seven years without passing any meaningful bills to protect Americans’ privacy on social media or move forward ​on antitrust legislation despite‍ apparent bipartisan consensus. Asked if he believed Congress could craft meaningful legislation to govern AI‌ in the near future, his answer​ was grim and simple.

“No.”

“I think the way ​most senators feel about artificial intelligence⁣ is that it has extraordinary potential to make our lives ‍better ‌if it doesn’t make our lives worse first.”

Forum Criticized for Offering No Real Progress on AI

A key point ​of contention among those⁢ leaving the‌ forum was Mr. Schumer’s making sweeping⁤ promises that the media frenzy would help to‌ promote some sort ​of legislative progress ⁣concerning AI regulation.

Mr. Schumer previously vowed that such forums would ​be a vital avenue for forming a legislative framework to contend with the “revolution” ‌of AI.

Leaving the ⁤forum, however, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) ​said he ⁢doubted Mr. Schumer’s sincerity in seeking ‍solutions to protect the American⁤ public from AI.

“It’s a little bit like with antitrust⁤ the last two years,” Mr.⁢ Hawley said. “He talks about it constantly and does nothing about it. You’ll see. My‌ sense is ‍ [that] a big‍ part of what this is is a lot of song and‌ dance ⁤that covers the fact⁣ that actually nothing is advancing.”

Mr. Hawley’s reference was to a series of vows made by Mr. Schumer over the ‌course of a number ⁣of ‌years to bring antitrust legislation to​ Congress to limit the scope ​of‍ mammoth tech corporations. After ⁣postponing such legislation time and again, however, Mr.⁣ Schumer in January refused to bring the ​written legislation to the Senate floor, claiming ⁣it would not receive enough votes to pass.

Some have questioned Mr. Schumer’s assertion and also raised⁤ issues ​with the long-time ‍senator’s deep ties to the tech companies in question.‍ In total, more than 80 of Mr. Schumer’s former staffers ⁣now work for major ‌tech corporations. Likewise, both of Mr. Schumer’s daughters work for major‍ tech corporations that would be directly affected by such legislation, one as a marketing manager for Meta and one as a ​lobbyist for Amazon.

To that end, Mr. Hawley also said⁣ the CEOs who were present claimed to be in favor of very vague regulations but would balk when presented with firm​ demands from the state.

“I’m really worried that this is⁣ the same song, second verse,” Hawley​ said.

“Soon, we’ll hear: ‘Well, we need to go really slow. Well,​ we can’t really agree well. Let’s study it. And ⁣then, five years​ from now, it’ll be a bonanza ​where all of the money will⁢ be going to⁢ these companies, and we’ll be ⁣losing jobs.”

Congressional Delay on AI ⁤Linked to Erosion ‍of Privacy,⁢ Civil Rights

The forum ⁤comes amid a series of ⁢high-profile congressional hearings on the issue ‍of AI.

Lawmakers are grappling with how ​to mitigate the dangers of the emerging technology, which has experienced a boom in investment in ⁢recent years.

During‍ one such Senate ​subcommittee hearing in⁤ May, Sen. Richard ⁢Blumenthal (D-Conn.) described the current state of AI development as a “bomb in a china shop.” The “looming new industrial revolution,” ⁤he said, could well‍ displace millions ‍of American workers and dramatically undermine public safety and⁢ trust in key institutions.

Despite that concern, OpenAI’s Mr. Altman insisted that “the benefits of [AI] vastly outweigh the risks.”

The forum also comes just on



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker