The epoch times

California lifts travel ban on states with anti-LGBT laws.

California lawmakers have passed a⁤ bill that will lift a law⁣ banning publicly‍ funded travel ⁢to ⁤states that⁢ had implemented ​measures against the LGBT agenda.

Senate Bill 447 would repeal a 2016 law, Assembly Bill 1887, ‌which prohibited ‌ California ⁤state agencies from sponsoring travel‍ for employees into ⁣states deemed to have anti-LGBTQ laws. SB 447 replaces Assembly Bill 1887 with⁢ an outreach campaign that​ seeks to boost LGBT inclusivity and acceptance in states identified ‍as having allegedly discriminatory laws. The bill was passed by the state Senate on Tuesday ⁢by a vote of 31-6. It was⁤ earlier passed by the state Assembly ‍on Monday by 64-12.

It now heads to⁢ the state’s Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom for final‌ approval, who has time until Oct. 14 to sign ⁢it into ⁣law. Once approved, SB 447 will come into effect immediately.

When Assembly Bill 1887 was passed, it had originally restricted travel to ‍just four states. But now, travel ⁣to 26 states or more than half of the United States has been restricted.

“In many instances, the travel ban has inadvertently caused California to isolate its⁣ services and citizens ‍in a time when we‌ are leading the nation in ensuring inclusivity and freedom,” said Democratic Assemblymember Rick Zbur, according to AP.

SB​ 447 was ​authored by State Senator Toni G.⁤ Atkins (D-Calif.), ⁤who is the first openly LGBT individual to lead the California legislature ⁣as​ a Senate president. The bill will create a fund aimed to push ​“inclusive messaging,” according to a Sept. 11 news release by​ the senator.

In a July interview ⁣ with The Epoch Times, Nicole Pearson, attorney and founder ⁢of constitutional law firm “Facts Law ⁢Truth Justice,” said that California legislators overstepped their bounds while passing SB 447.

“California has gone from passive-aggressively forcing its pro-abortion⁣ and gender-affirming-care agenda by⁤ banning travel, to actively pushing it on other⁤ states with other ‍legislation including SB 447,” ‌she said. Ms. Pearson found the bill smacking of⁤ unconstitutionality.

Travel Restrictions and Financial Implications

The passage of SB​ 447 came⁢ months after California’s State ​Attorney General expanded travel restrictions under Assembly Bill 1887 to three states in July—Missouri, Nebraska, and Wyoming. ‍These states had passed laws restricting transgender students from participating in school sports teams that do not align with their biological sex.

In a​ July 14 press release, Mr. Bonta had called the laws in the states “discriminatory” and constituting a “clear ‌case of government overreach.” If SB 447 comes into effect, the July travel restrictions would also be ⁢repealed.

In a Sept. 7 post on X, nonprofit advocacy CA Family Council slammed SB 447 as a⁤ “nationwide marketing campaign to promote LGBTQ+ ideology​ in red states.”

In a July interview with The Epoch Times, Erin Friday,‌ a co-leader ⁤at advocacy​ “Our⁣ Duty” that focuses on safeguarding minors from transgender ideology, questioned SB 477’s financial implications.

While California is suffering ‌from a declining economy, ⁢budget shortfalls, and exodus ⁣of businesses, some Democrat lawmakers want to use state funds to promote transgenderism‌ in other states through legislation like SB ⁣447, she said.

The Senate‍ appropriations committee stated that the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) would have to shell out more than half​ a million dollars in annual ‌staffing costs to implement proposals made under the bill.

If sufficient donations are not raised to fund SB 447 as expected,⁢ the bill will result in cost pressure, the magnitude of which is “unknown, but potentially significant,” the committee had warned.

In April, a city ordinance​ in San Francisco which sought to boycott anti-LGBTQ states was repealed after seven years ⁣in effect. A report found that the ordinance ⁤contributed to ⁢rising expenses for the city, with officials admitting that it did not produce⁣ the expected outcome.

Promoting LGBT in California

SB 447⁤ is California’s latest ⁤push to promote an LGBT agenda. The state had previously implemented several pro-LGBT laws and is also promoting such ideologies in educational institutions.

A file photo of the Progress Pride flag. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty‍ Images)

In ‌June, California’s Department of Education and legislators called on textbook publishers to add more ‍“diversity” in educational resources and materials, including promoting LGBT themes.

“Many of our textbooks haven’t kept up with that diversity. This is a chance to diversify those narratives,” Superintendent of Public‌ Instruction Tony Thurmond⁢ said during a press conference.

“This is all happening against the backdrop‌ of where you have governors in other states literally trying to strip out any representation about race, about the experience of LGBT students, students ‌with ​disabilities. ⁣California’s going in the other ​direction.”

Mr. Thurmond also vowed to increase oversight on school boards‍ that resist in



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker