Fulton County DA hides evidence that could derail Trump RICO case.
Fulton County DA Accused of Withholding Evidence in Trump RICO Case
In the ongoing RICO case in Fulton County, Georgia, involving allegations of an attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, Sidney Powell’s defense attorney made a stunning accusation on Thursday. He claimed that county prosecutors had violated the law by withholding exculpatory evidence.
The case took an interesting turn when Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee made a significant ruling, separating Powell’s and pro-Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro’s cases from those of former President Donald Trump and the other defendants. This decision was reported by CNN.
Powell and Chesebro, eager for a speedy trial as guaranteed by their Sixth Amendment rights, found themselves at odds with Trump and the other defendants, who preferred a slower pace to better prepare their defenses.
Brian Rafferty, Powell’s defense attorney, accused Fulton County prosecutors of failing to provide him with favorable information, which they are obligated to do under due process. Rafferty cited the landmark 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland to support his argument.
The crux of the issue revolves around whether Powell broke the law by tampering with voting machines in Coffee County, Georgia, during her investigation into potential manipulation during the 2020 election. Rafferty argued in court that Powell had been invited by Coffee County officials to examine the machines.
During the hearing, Rafferty highlighted a report by CNN that confirmed the existence of a letter of invitation from Coffee County to another lawyer, inviting them to investigate. This letter, according to Rafferty, supports Powell’s actions.
Despite Rafferty’s repeated requests for the evidence, he claimed that Fulton County prosecutors remained unresponsive. This lack of cooperation led Rafferty to file a motion seeking relief.
Fulton County Prosecutors Accused of Hiding Key Documents in Trump RICO Case
“I heard squat from the state.”
“They have it, your Honor. I have a reason to believe they have it and they don’t even respond. I have a motion. I’m going to file it. I’m going to ask for this relief,… pic.twitter.com/qiPcp1GXfZ
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 14, 2023
Rafferty emphasized that the prosecutors claimed to be open and willing to provide the necessary evidence, but he argued that they had failed to meet their constitutional obligations. He firmly believed that the withheld information would prove Powell’s innocence and demonstrate that she should not be part of the case.
Following the hearing, ABC News editorial producer John Santucci expressed his belief that it was a bad day for the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office. He speculated that Fani Willis, the district attorney, would be frustrated by the outcome of the hearing.
“This is not a good day for the Fulton County DA.”
“Fani Willis wasn’t there, but you got to imagine… she’s throwing things against the wall based on this hearing.”
“A great win for Donald Trump and others that did not want to be part of this speedy trial case.”
“I can tell… pic.twitter.com/cfhiw7DpFS
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 14, 2023
Willis had initially sought an October trial date for all 19 defendants, but McAfee denied this request. As a result, Powell and Chesebro will have their trial this fall, followed by another trial in the spring for Trump and the remaining defendants. This arrangement will allow the latter group to better prepare their defense.
Judge Scott McAfee rules that severing the remaining 17 Fulton defendants from Ken Chesebro and Sidney Powell, who demanded speedy trials and are going to court on Oct. 23, is “simply a procedural and logistical inevitability” pic.twitter.com/hXFd26QjuP
— Tamar Hallerman (@TamarHallerman) September 14, 2023
The trial for the first two defendants is scheduled to commence on October 23, according to The Associated Press.
The post Fulton County DA Accused of Burying Evidence That Could Derail Trump RICO Case appeared first on The Western Journal.
What are the potential consequences of prosecutors withholding evidence in a RICO case involving allegations of attempting to overturn a presidential election
E. He acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations made by Powell’s defense attorney and emphasized the importance of prosecutors fulfilling their legal obligations.
The accusation of withholding evidence in a RICO case, particularly one involving allegations of attempting to overturn a presidential election, is highly significant and requires a thorough investigation. The integrity of the criminal justice system relies on the fair and impartial presentation of evidence, and any violation of this principle undermines the credibility of the case.
The decision by Judge McAfee to separate Powell’s and Chesebro’s cases from those of former President Donald Trump and the other defendants further complicates the proceedings. While Powell and Chesebro seek a speedy trial, Trump and the other defendants prefer a slower pace to adequately prepare their defenses. This divergence in interests adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious case.
Brian Rafferty’s accusation that Fulton County prosecutors failed to provide him with favorable information, as required by due process, brings further attention to the case. Rafferty invoked the landmark 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland, which established the principle that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. The alleged misconduct by the prosecutors raises concerns about their adherence to this fundamental legal obligation.
At the heart of the matter is whether Powell broke the law by tampering with voting machines during her investigation into potential manipulation during the 2020 election. Rafferty argued that Powell had been invited to examine the machines by Coffee County officials. He emphasized a report by CNN that confirmed the existence of a letter of invitation from Coffee County to another lawyer, which, according to Rafferty, supports Powell’s actions.
Despite Rafferty’s repeated requests for the evidence, he claimed that Fulton County prosecutors remained unresponsive. This lack of cooperation compelled Rafferty to file a motion seeking relief. The tweet by Kyle Becker, which quoted Rafferty expressing frustration and alleging that key documents were being hidden by the prosecutors, further amplifies concerns regarding the handling of the case.
Rafferty’s assertion that the prosecutors claimed to be open and willing to provide evidence, but their failure to meet their constitutional obligations, raises questions about their transparency and commitment to a fair trial. Rafferty firmly believes that the withheld information could exonerate Powell and support her removal from the case.
The accusations of evidence withholding in the Fulton County RICO case are significant and demand a thorough investigation to uphold the principles of fairness and justice. The alleged actions by the prosecutors cast a shadow of doubt over the credibility and integrity of the case. As the proceedings continue, it will be crucial for the courts and legal authorities to address these concerns and ensure that all relevant evidence is disclosed in accordance with the law. Only through a fair and transparent process can justice be served and the truth be revealed.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...