CNN roasted for claiming Constitution is outdated, endangers democracy.
The Western Journal: CNN Receives Backlash for Outrageous Chyron Claiming Constitution is ‘Outdated, Puts Democracy at Risk’
The few remaining viewers of CNN got a remarkable dose of news on Saturday.
Just in time for Constitution Day, CNN’s dwindling audience learned that the Consitution of the United States — the oldest written government charter in the world and the document that gave birth to the nation that has spread democracy around the globe — has become so “outdated” that it’s actually a “threat to democracy.”
Of course, that’s democracy as CNN’s scholars understand it. And you can’t spell ignorance without “C-N-N.”
The word came on “Newsroom,” anchored by former CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta. Acosta interviewed two Harvard professors of government who are of the opinion that the grand system of compromise, checks and balances devised by the Founders in Philadelphia in 1787 is as obsolete as the quill pens they used to write it down.
Accompanying the interview was a chyron at the bottom of the screen declaring (in all caps): “Scholars Warn Outdated Constitution Has Put Democracy At Risk.”
And it was scorched on social media:
CNN “Scholars” are biased, irrelevant hacks willing to be paid to push the narrative that the Commie News Network wants. The word “Democracy” doesn’t appear in the Constitution or Declaration of Independence for a reason. A true scholar would know this.
— Stewie Griffin (@StewGriffin52) September 17, 2023
Whenever you see/hear “democracy” referred to as if it is our form of government, it is a BIG RED FLAG that you are seeing a communist agenda. 99% of the time that type of reference silently refers to “Marxist democracy”, or an official government that has pure Democracy as its…
— Jack Deth (@NotJackDeth) September 17, 2023
When they say “democracy” they really mean, “deep state”. Replace those words out and it makes PERFECT sense.
— Kurt Schemers (@KurtSchemers) September 17, 2023
CNN chyron’s are known for their quirks. The network’s now-legendary description of the 2020 Kenosha, Wisconsin, riots as”Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests” is a classic contribution to American journalism that deserves to be remembered for decades to come.
But in fairness to CNN’s chyron writers (a job where respect for truth is clearly not a priority), there was a at least a tiny bit of justification for it this time.
Acosta’s guests, Harvard’s Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt do indeed argue that the Constitution is a “threat to democracy.” What they don’t acknowledge, though, is that that “threat” was deliberately designed into the document — a “feature,” not a “bug.”
Levitsky and Ziblatt both surely know that. They’re probably just as sure that a large segment of a largely ignorant American population do not.
They are authors of “Tyranny of the Minority,” a new book aimed at attacking the Constitution, judging by their conversation with Acosta, by hitting the usual liberal targets — the Electoral College and the United States Senate.
Check it out here:
The Electoral College was the Founders’ method of ensuring that states with small populations would have an equal say in choosing the leader of the country.
It’s also how a president can get elected without winning the nationally popular vote — a concept that appears to outrage Messrs. Levitsky and Ziblatt but is a small price to pay for saving the country from being dominated by huge states like New York and California with little or nothing in common with, say, conservative Idaho or liberal Vermont.
It doesn’t take a scholar to understand that
The Senate, meanwhile, is where bills go to die — and it was meant to be that way, to protect the country from the rush of popular passion. In any apocryphal story that’s almost too good to be true, George Washington is said to have told Thomas Jefferson that the Senate was a means of cooling off bills before they could become the law of the land, like tea needed to cool before it can be enjoyed.
The Senate and its filibuster have stood in the way of some very good ideas — the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for instance. They stood in the way of some very bad ones — like expanding the United States Supreme Court.
While the filibuster isn’t in the Constitution, the Senate’s role as an upper chamber of Congress is, with its members’ terms are three times longer than in the House, and where only a third of the body turns over at mid-term elections.
Contrary to what liberals — and even sane Americans — often think, the United States is not a democracy, it’s a republic — a collection of largely sovereign states united into the greater body of the United States.
It’s the autonomy of the individual states that helps make the country the freest in the world. Not only do American voters have to power to change their own government, they have to power to move to another government if theirs is not to their liking, but they don’t have to leave the country. (Think of all those New Yorkers fleeing to Florida in recent years.)
So naturally, that’s what liberals hate. And since the Electoral College and the Senate’s position are what guarantees the freedom of smaller states (leave it to the genius of the Founders to protect liberty by limiting democracy), liberals hate them passionately.
And as happens periodically in history, the left is attacking the Constitution itself. (Before the turn of the last century, Woodrew Wilson, before he became president, might have been the document’s best-known opponent.)
But patriotic Americans know better, and on social media, it showed.
No better showing of why people are concerned about the education system. They’re producing such “scholars.”
— Publius (@Publius215) September 16, 2023
The Constitution is everything.
— Sunshine State of Mind ️ (@foundinsunshine) September 17, 2023
What’s interesting is that Levitsky and Ziblatt seem to think that every change to the Constitution has been good — ignoring the disaster of Prohibition, for instance (instituted by the 18th Amendment, repealed by the 21st) or the 17th Amendment that gave the country popular election of the Senate instead of senators being elected by state legislatures and has gotten worse ever since. (A truly conservative Republican Party would make repealing the 17th Amendment part of its platform.)
The professors note that the country came close to abolishing the Electoral College in 1970 and appear to be convinced — or trying to convince the shrinking band of Americans still tuning in to CNN — that the fact that it hasn’t makes the Constitution a weapon for tyranny instead of a shield for freedom.
As the country marked Constitution Day on Sunday, remembering the gift from God that was the signing of the Constitution at Philadelphia’s Constitutional Convention, the lesson from CNN a day earlier couldn’t have been more timely.
It’s not that the Constitution needs to be amended immediately to satisfy leftists, though. It’s something much of much more immediate importance:
That you can’t spell ignorance with C-N-N.
How does the Constitution’s system of checks and balances prevent the majority from having unchecked power?
Ion and promoting the idea of majoritarian rule. Their argument boils down to this: the Constitution’s system of checks and balances allows a minority of the population to wield disproportionate power, making it difficult for the majority to enact their preferred policies and undermining what they consider to be true democracy.
But this argument fundamentally misunderstands the purpose and genius of the Constitution. The Founding Fathers were well aware of the dangers of pure democracy, which they saw as mob rule that trampled on individual rights. They designed a system that balanced majority rule with the protection of minority rights, ensuring that no faction could seize complete control and abuse their power.
The Constitution’s framers understood that a stable and functioning democracy required more than just the will of the majority. They recognized the importance of a system of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power, and they saw the value in deliberation and compromise. This is why we have a bicameral legislature, an independent judiciary, and an executive branch with limited powers.
Levitsky and Ziblatt, however, seem to prefer a system where the majority can steamroll over the minority, with no regard for individual rights or the long-term stability of the country. They argue that the Constitution is undemocratic precisely because it prevents the majority from imposing their will unchecked. But this is a feature, not a bug.
The Constitution’s protections for individual rights and its system of checks and balances have served us well for over two centuries. They have prevented the tyranny of the majority and safeguarded our democracy from the dangers of unchecked power. The Constitution is not outdated; it is a timeless document that continues to guide and govern our nation.
CNN’s decision to air this outrageous chyron claiming that the Constitution is a threat to democracy is not only misleading but also deeply irresponsible. It perpetuates a misunderstanding of our founding principles and undermines the very foundations of our democracy.
As Americans, we must reject such attempts to delegitimize our Constitution and promote a vision of democracy that is fundamentally at odds with the principles of liberty and individual rights. We should celebrate the Constitution on Constitution Day and reaffirm our commitment to the ideals it represents.
CNN’s dwindling viewership is a testament to the fact that the American people are not buying into their biased and misleading reporting. The network would do well to reevaluate its priorities and return to responsible journalism that upholds the truth and respects the principles that have made our country great.
In conclusion, the claim that the Constitution is outdated and a threat to democracy is a baseless and misguided argument. The Constitution remains a cornerstone of our democratic system, providing the framework for our government and protecting the rights and freedoms of all Americans. We must defend and uphold the Constitution against such unfounded attacks, ensuring that our democracy continues to thrive for generations to come.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
