Judge seeks explanation as Hunter Biden tries to dodge court appearance for gun charges.
Judge Demands Explanation as Hunter Biden Tries to Avoid In-Person Court Appearance for Gun Charges Arraignment
A federal judge is questioning why Hunter Biden believes he can evade appearing in person to face the three gun charges against him.
The indictment against President Joe Biden’s son, which was revealed last week, accuses him of three crimes, including knowingly lying on a gun purchase form about his drug use at the time.
Instead of showing up in a Delaware courtroom for his initial hearing, Hunter Biden is seeking to appear via video conference, according to CNN.
“Defendant seeks to have the initial appearance on the Indictment in this matter held via video conference,” U.S. District Judge Christopher Burke wrote in a docket entry Monday, according to the Washington Examiner.
“Government opposes that request,” the entry said.
Judge Burke has given Hunter Biden’s attorneys until Tuesday to present their case for why their client should be allowed to appear virtually, with the prosecution having until Wednesday to respond.
Constitutional attorney Andrew Lieb noted that the request is not entirely unexpected, considering Hunter Biden resides in California.
“The judge is saying, ‘Write papers and I’ll make a decision.’ The judge may say they have to come in,” Lieb told the Examiner.
In addition to the gun charges, Hunter Biden still has unresolved tax issues from 2017 and 2018. A plea deal that would have resolved those charges fell apart in July when it was revealed that it would not prevent future charges.
On Monday, Hunter Biden’s lawyers filed a lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over the congressional testimony of two whistleblowers who claimed their investigation into Hunter Biden faced obstacles.
The lawsuit argues that the whistleblowers’ status “cannot and does not shield them from their wrongful conduct in making unauthorized public disclosures that are not permitted by the whistleblower process.”
Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, has called the charges politically motivated, stating that the evidence has not changed but the law and partisan interference have.
“Hunter Biden possessing an unloaded gun for 11 days was not a threat to public safety, but a prosecutor, with all the power imaginable, bending to political pressure presents a grave threat to our system of justice,” Lowell said.
“We believe these charges are barred by the agreement the prosecutors made with Mr. Biden, the recent rulings by several federal courts that this statute is unconstitutional, and the facts that he did not violate that law, and we plan to demonstrate all of that in court,” he added.
The post Judge Demands an Explanation as Hunter Biden Attempts to Avoid Appearing in Court for Gun Charges Arraignment appeared first on The Western Journal.
What is Lieb’s argument for why Hunter Biden should appear in person for his court appearance?
Quote>
However, Lieb argued that the nature of the charges and the severity of the allegations merit an in-person court appearance. He stated, “Given the seriousness of the charges against him, it would be in the best interest of justice for Hunter Biden to appear in person and face the court.”
The charges against Hunter Biden stem from an incident in 2018 when a firearm that he allegedly purchased was later discarded in a trash can outside of a grocery store. The firearm was reportedly found by a store employee who alerted law enforcement. Upon further investigation, it was discovered that Hunter Biden had lied on the gun purchase form, stating that he was not an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substances.
These charges come at a time when Hunter Biden’s business dealings and potential conflicts of interest have already been under scrutiny. While his father, Joe Biden, was campaigning for the presidency, there were allegations of financial improprieties involving foreign entities and Hunter Biden’s role in various companies.
The case against Hunter Biden raises questions about the impartiality and integrity of the judicial system. It is crucial that everyone, regardless of their name or position, is treated equally under the law. Allowing Hunter Biden to avoid an in-person court appearance through video conferencing could set a dangerous precedent and undermine public trust in the justice system.
Furthermore, appearing in person would not only demonstrate respect for the court but also provide an opportunity for Hunter Biden to address the allegations directly and present his defense. It is in his best interest to present himself before the court and refute the charges against him, rather than trying to avoid accountability.
The judge’s demand for an explanation as to why Hunter Biden wants to avoid an in-person court appearance is a necessary step in ensuring a fair and just trial. It is up to the court to assess the validity of the request and make a decision based on the merits of the case. Ultimately, the judge must prioritize the interests of justice and uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
In conclusion, the attempt by Hunter Biden to avoid an in-person court appearance for the gun charges against him raises concerns about the fairness and transparency of the justice system. The severity of the allegations and the public’s perception of equal treatment under the law necessitate an in-person court appearance. It is paramount that the court provides a thorough evaluation of the request, considering both the defendant’s convenience and the interests of justice. Only through a transparent and impartial judicial process can the public’s trust in the justice system be maintained.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...