Trump highlights stark contrast between his successful hostage rescues and Biden’s flawed Iran deal.

The Art of the Deal Author Slams Biden’s Iranian Deal as a‍ “Steal”

The man behind the bestselling ​book “The Art of the Deal”​ took to social media on Monday to express his outrage over what he sees as a lopsided deal negotiated by President Joe Biden with Iran.

According to ‌ The New York Times, Iran released⁤ five American prisoners in exchange ‍for $6 ⁤billion in unfrozen oil assets. While the Biden administration claimed that the money could only be used for food, medicine, and humanitarian purposes, it admitted that there are no restrictions preventing Iran from diverting the funds for ‍other uses.⁢ Iranian President​ Ebrahim Raisi even declared that he would spend the money as he pleases.

Former President Donald Trump, who has been critical of⁤ paying ransom, voiced his disapproval of the deal. He highlighted his own success in bringing hostages home without paying anything, emphasizing ⁤that once you start paying, more⁢ hostages will be ‍taken.

Trump also criticized the deal, stating that Iran got the better end of the bargain, calling Biden “Dumb as ‌a ROCK!”

In⁣ another post, Trump warned voters about the dangerous⁢ precedent set by the deal and urged them to “MAKE AMERICA GREAT‌ AGAIN” by voting for⁢ him in⁤ the next election.

Trump further criticized Biden’s presidency, pointing⁣ out⁤ various issues such as Afghanistan, inflation, open borders, and the absence of⁤ voter ID laws. He questioned why the Republican Party hasn’t initiated the process of invoking the 25th Amendment against Biden.

Trump⁤ was not alone in condemning the deal.​ Others, including Republican ⁢Congressman Michael McCaul​ and Senator Tom Cotton, expressed concerns about the potential misuse of the funds by Iran ‍for terrorist activities.

Mick Mulroy, a former Pentagon official, warned that the deal could encourage countries to incarcerate ⁣Americans as⁢ political hostages.

Even some ‌Democrats, such as Representative Pat⁣ Ryan ⁤and Senator Bob Menendez, expressed reservations about Biden’s decision.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken advised Americans against traveling to Iran, ⁢emphasizing that the release of these prisoners does⁤ not guarantee the safety of others.

Overall, the deal has sparked widespread criticism and raised concerns about its implications for future negotiations and the security of American citizens.

Source: The Western‌ Journal

What⁤ potential threats could arise from Iran ⁢using the released funds for nefarious agendas?

Erting the funds ‍to support⁣ its military or fund terrorist activities.

In his Twitter post, the author ​of “The Art⁤ of the Deal,” Donald Trump, ⁣slammed the Iranian deal as a ⁢”steal” and criticized President Biden for his handling of the negotiation. Trump argued that the United States gave ​away too much in exchange for the release of the American prisoners, calling it‍ a one-sided agreement that prioritized Iran’s interests over America’s.

Trump’s criticism echoes the concerns of many‌ conservatives and foreign policy​ experts​ who have raised alarms over the Biden administration’s approach⁢ to dealing with Iran. They argue that by⁣ providing such a significant sum of ‍money to the Iranian‌ regime without clear and enforceable restrictions, the‍ United States is enabling and empowering a‌ dangerous and oppressive regime.

In recent years, Iran has engaged ⁣in destabilizing activities ⁣across the Middle East, supporting regional proxies, and pursuing its nuclear ambitions. Critics ‍argue that the released funds could be used by Iran to further⁢ these nefarious agendas and pose​ a threat to regional stability.

Furthermore, ⁣critics argue that the Biden ‌administration’s deal with Iran sets a dangerous precedent for future negotiations with rogue states and ⁣undermines the leverage and credibility of the⁢ United States. They warn that other adversaries, such ⁤as North Korea, may see this deal as a green light to⁢ demand significant concessions ⁤in exchange⁤ for limited concessions of their own.

Supporters of‍ the Biden administration’s approach, on the other hand,⁢ argue‍ that negotiations and‍ engagement with Iran are the most ⁤effective means of addressing the nation’s nuclear ambitions and curbing its destabilizing activities. They contend that the ‍deal represents a necessary step towards diplomatic solutions and that the restrictions on funds will prevent Iran from using the money for malicious purposes.

Ultimately, the debate over the Iranian deal reflects broader divisions within US foreign policy circles. It highlights the challenges of negotiating with authoritarian regimes and the complex considerations involved in balancing national security interests with ⁤human rights concerns.

Regardless of one’s perspective on the Iranian deal, ⁤it is clear that it will continue ‌to be a contentious issue with far-reaching implications. The consequences of this​ agreement may reverberate across the international ⁣stage, ⁣shaping the trajectory of ⁤US-Iran relations ⁢and influencing broader regional dynamics.

As the debate unfolds, it remains ‍to be seen whether President Biden’s⁤ deal with Iran will prove to be a successful diplomatic achievement or a strategic blunder. Only time⁤ will​ tell.