Liberals furious over New Hampshire’s conservative curriculum adoption.
Public schools are facing backlash from liberals as they allocate more funding for LGBT curricula. The recent approval of an online course by the state of New Hampshire has sparked outrage among liberals. The course, produced by a conservative nonprofit group called PragerU, denounces climate change and white supremacy theories. Rolling Stone Magazine even published an article titled “PragerU’s Right-Wing Playbook for Infiltrating Public Education Is Working” the day after the course was approved.
New Hampshire Democrat Cinde Warmington, a gubernatorial candidate and member of the state’s Executive Council, expressed her disapproval of PragerU’s presence in schools, stating that “PragerU truly just has no place in our schools.”
Mrs. Warmington, who has previously supported funding for Planned Parenthood and promoted Pride Month, has called for the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office to investigate PragerU for consumer fraud due to its self-proclaimed status as a university.
However, the Attorney General’s Office issued a statement prior to the approval of the curriculum, stating that PragerU does not hold itself out to be an institute of higher learning and acknowledged that it offers “edutainment.”
Other state Democrats, including the New House Democratic Caucus, have labeled the PragerU curriculum as dangerous, accusing the company of spreading misinformation and teaching incorrect history.
The curriculum in question, called Cash Course, is a free program consisting of 15 five-minute videos covering topics such as “Understanding Taxes,” ”What is An Economy,” and “Insurance Basics.” One of the videos, titled “Student Loan 101,” addresses the misconception that student loans are free money and explains the concept of debt and different types of student loans.Republicans argue that the criticism of the PragerU curriculum is hypocritical, considering the wide variety of curricula funded by taxpayers, including the controversial app called Sora, which has given students access to pornographic material.
Laurie Kench, a parent and member of the parents’ rights group Citizens For Responsible Education (CRE), expressed disbelief at the accusations against PragerU, stating, ”There’s porn on there, and they are calling a conservative curriculum dangerous? That’s crazy!”
Melissa Blasek, Executive Director of Rebuild NH, believes it is necessary for conservatives to counter the radical ideology being taught in public schools. She argues that if every left-wing curriculum were to be objected to, there would be very few curriculum offerings left.
Anne Marie Banfield, a mother from New Hampshire, recalled a time when she and other parents protested the adoption of a book promoting Marxist propaganda in a personal finance class. She emphasizes the importance of ensuring that curriculum aligns with educational goals rather than pushing a specific agenda.
Parents in Goffstown, New Hampshire, have recently objected to a poster promoting transgenderism displayed in a middle school library. Nancy Biederman, one of the parents, appreciates that the PragerU curriculum provides an alternative option for students and believes it is not something that is forced upon them.
The adoption of PragerU has also sparked controversy in other states, including Texas, Missouri, and Florida, where it has been integrated into the core curriculum of schools. Critics accuse Florida Governor Ron DeSantis of contradicting his “education, not indoctrination” motto by promoting PragerU.
Despite the criticism, PragerU maintains its mission to promote American values and offer an alternative to left-wing ideology in culture, media, and education.
What are the concerns raised regarding the allocation of funds towards LGBT curricula and how does it impact other educational needs
Loans. The course aims to provide basic financial education to high school students to help them make informed decisions about their personal finances.
Despite the educational nature of the curriculum, critics argue that its association with PragerU, a conservative organization, undermines its credibility and promotes a biased agenda. They contend that the inclusion of videos denouncing climate change and white supremacy theories is an attempt to indoctrinate students with conservative ideologies.
Supporters of the curriculum, on the other hand, argue that it is important to expose students to a range of perspectives and encourage critical thinking. They believe that students should have access to diverse viewpoints and be able to evaluate and analyze information for themselves.
The controversy surrounding the inclusion of LGBT curricula in public schools further exacerbates the debate. While proponents argue that it is necessary to promote inclusivity and foster acceptance of LGBT individuals, opponents believe that it goes against their religious and moral beliefs.
The issue of funding allocation also comes into play. Critics question the prioritization of funds towards LGBT curricula, arguing that there are more pressing educational needs that require financial resources. They argue that addressing issues like infrastructure, teacher salaries, and improving academic outcomes should take precedence over implementing LGBT curricula.
In response to the backlash, the New Hampshire Department of Education has defended its decision to approve the online course, stating that it complies with state standards and provides valuable financial education to students.
The controversy surrounding PragerU’s curriculum highlights the ongoing tension between different ideological viewpoints in public education. It raises questions about the role of schools in shaping students’ beliefs and values and the limits of ideological influence in the classroom.
Ultimately, the inclusion of controversial curricula in public schools should be approached with careful consideration and a commitment to providing students with a well-rounded education that promotes critical thinking, inclusivity, and respect for diverse perspectives. It is crucial to strike a balance between exposing students to different viewpoints and preserving the integrity of education by ensuring that curriculum decisions are based on sound educational principles and standards.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...