NYC Council may remove monuments honoring historical figures.
OAN’s Elizabeth Volberding
12:51 PM – Tuesday, September 19, 2023
On Tuesday, a committee on the New York City Council was set to vote on a proposal that could result in monuments honoring figures such as George Washington, Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, Peter Stuyvesant, and more being removed due to their “controversial” pasts.
A public hearing was held on Tuesday addressing the proposal established by the NYC Committee on cultural affairs, libraries, and international intergroup relations. The proposal specified that public art that portrays someone who has been linked to slavery or “crimes against humanity” should be taken down.
However, if the commission determines that a statue or monument honors a person who committed crimes against humanity, but votes not to remove the artwork, it would require the city to create an “explanatory plaque” discussing the misdeeds of the historical figure.
The committee’s hearing involved additional legislation that would mandate the city’s Public Design Commission (PDC) to administer a plan to remove works of art on New York property.
According to the committee, the monuments represent individuals who owned enslaved persons or who economically benefited from slavery, or those who participated in systemic crimes against indigenous people.
“This bill would require the PDC to publish a plan to remove works of art on City property that depict a person who owned enslaved persons or directly benefited [sic] economically from slavery, or who participated in systemic crimes against indigenous peoples or other crimes against humanity,” the proposal explains. “If PDC determines a work of art depicts a person who fits these criteria and decides not to remove the work of art, PDC would be required to include in the plan steps it will take to install an explanatory plaque next to the work of art.”
However, Republican officials claimed that the proposal was created in an effort to erase history and dishonor those who established America. Critics immediately branded the attempt to remove the notable statues as being a part of “cancel culture”.
“This is little more than an attempt by the radical left to rewrite our nation’s history,” said Republican Councilwoman Joann Ariola of Queens, according to the New York Post. “These men all had an enormous impact on this country, and these statues commemorating their achievements have been in place for decades.”
“The radical left has been trying to reframe our nation as one born from evil, and it is time we put our foot down and say enough is enough,” she added. “The Founding Fathers and the others who worked so hard to establish this great country should be celebrated, not eliminated from memory.”
There are over half-a-dozen monuments on city property admiring Washington, the first president of the United States and a revolutionary hero, which could now potentially be taken down. These include monuments in Washington Square Park and Union Square Park.
Statues of Christopher Columbus, an Italian man famously known for discovering the “new world” in 1492, was also targeted with outcries for his statue to be removed from the public square due to how he allegedly “abused native populations throughout his travels.”
Additionally, Peter Stuyvesant, an early New York settler and slaveholder, has a statue erected of him in Stuyvesant Park, and the prestigious Stuyvesant High School is also named after him.
Furthermore, NYC officials have already taken down a statue of Thomas Jefferson, an author of the Declaration of Independence and the third president of the U.S., due to his connection with slavery. These included monuments at the city council chambers that were removed in 2021.
Another monument, which honors the 26th president of the U.S., Teddy Roosevelt, has also been taken down from in front of the Natural History Museum in New York.
“I thought this was behind us,” Angelo Vivolo, president of the Columbus Heritage Coalition said. “This woke group wants to cancel our culture.
“I’m here for the fight. The Italian-American community will come out strongly against this move to ban Columbus, a symbol of Italian-American accomplishment. But it’s not just Columbus. You’re going against Washington… Jefferson…. You’re going against the people who contributed greatly to America,” he added.
The 51-member New York City Council is also in control of the operation of city agencies and the passing of both local regulations and laws that deal with everything from outdoor dining to zoning matters. However, their main focus currently is canceling historical figures deemed “controversial.”
Brooklyn Council Sany Nurse, the author of the proposal, was not immediately available for comment when asked about the situation.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
With Attorney General Merrick Garland set to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, One America’s John Hines caught up with Chairman Jim Jordan to see what he hopes to hear from the Biden AG. Take a look.
Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, representative James Comer tells One America News that there may be some irony to the lawsuit brought by Hunter Biden against the IRS and two whistleblowers.
A Democrat judge blocks a $15,000 donation to border town law enforcement, calling it political.
with Tom Maoli
LONDON (Reuters) -The European Commission launched an investigation on Wednesday into whether to impose punitive tariffs to protect European Union automakers against…
By John Revill ZURICH (Reuters) – ABB is spending $280 million on a new robotics factory in Sweden, the Swiss engineering and…
PARIS (Reuters) – French Europe Minister Laurence Boon on Wednesday welcomed an anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles launched by the EU…
By Mathieu Rosemain and Silvia Aloisi PARIS (Reuters) – Apple said on Wednesday its iPhone 12 model was certified by multiple international…
rnrn
Should public art that depicts individuals associated with slavery or crimes against humanity be removed, or should explanatory plaques be added to provide historical context?
Ntroversial” due to their past actions related to slavery and crimes against humanity.
The proposal, put forth by the NYC Committee on cultural affairs, libraries, and international intergroup relations, suggests the removal of public art that portrays individuals associated with slavery or “crimes against humanity.” If the commission determines that a statue or monument honors a person who committed such crimes, but decides not to remove the artwork, an “explanatory plaque” must be created to discuss the historical figure’s misdeeds.
The public hearing held on Tuesday addressed this proposal, as well as additional legislation that would mandate the city’s Public Design Commission (PDC) to develop a plan for removing art on New York property. The committee argues that these monuments represent individuals who either owned enslaved persons, economically benefitted from slavery, or participated in systemic crimes against indigenous people.
However, Republican officials have expressed opposition to the proposal, claiming that it is an attempt to erase history and dishonor those who established America. Critics have labeled this movement as “cancel culture.” Councilwoman Joann Ariola of Queens stated, “This is little more than an attempt by the radical left to rewrite our nation’s history. These men all had an enormous impact on this country, and these statues commemorating their achievements have been in place for decades.”
The potential removal of these statues includes those honoring George Washington, Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, and Peter Stuyvesant, among others. Some argue that George Washington, the first president of the United States
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...