Pornhub staff confess to featuring underage content in hidden videos, potentially involving individuals as young as 16.
Senior Employees at MindGeek Admit to Neglecting Underage Content Moderation
Recently, shocking undercover videos have emerged, revealing senior employees at MindGeek, the parent company of popular porn site Pornhub, admitting that they did not take moderation protocols for underage content seriously until 2020. The videos, secretly recorded by journalists at Sound Investigations, expose the alarming lack of measures in place to prevent the presence of underage individuals in videos on the site.
Unknowingly Monetizing Content of Unknown Origin
In the video, Mike Farley, identified as MindGeek’s technical product manager, expresses the company’s inability to determine the age of individuals in videos. He highlights the risk of underage individuals slipping through the cracks with fake IDs, stating, “They look 20, they could be 16, you know? How do you know the difference between a 20-year-old and a 16-year-old nowadays?” Farley also reveals that the company runs ads on content without knowing the source or the consent of the individuals involved.
Nonchalant Attitude Towards Moderation
Farley further admits that content moderators would often skim through videos for extreme violence, such as ”murder videos” or “snuff films,” without thoroughly assessing the age of the individuals involved. He shockingly states, “No one gave a s***. It’s fine because no one got killed.”
Slow Moderation System and Legal Consequences
In another undercover video, Dillon Rice, a senior scriptwriter at MindGeek, acknowledges the presence of underage individuals on the site. He explains that while such content can be removed, the moderation system is slow, leading to delays that result in legal action against the company. Rice recounts instances where underage girls contacted Pornhub to have videos removed, but their requests were either ignored or handled inadequately.
Challenges in Age Verification
Rice highlights the difficulty in verifying the age of individuals in videos, especially when they possess fake identification cards. He also mentions the challenge posed by foreign uploads, as different countries have varying identification systems. Unlike other pornography websites that use professional production studios, Pornhub relies heavily on user-generated content, which lacks the rigorous age verification processes.
MindGeek’s Negligence and Financial Priorities
Rice criticizes MindGeek’s failure to invest in moderation and site quality despite their immense profits. He claims that executives prioritized personal gain over addressing these issues, leading to a lack of due diligence. Rice emphasizes that the company’s complacency stemmed from a misguided belief that their reputation as a household brand would shield them from consequences.
Exploitation and Lack of Transparency
Farley reveals a disturbing “loophole” where videos featuring potential underage individuals can be uploaded without verification if their faces are not shown. He acknowledges that this loophole is exploited by various individuals, including rapists, who profit from the site. Farley also discloses that MindGeek leadership instructed staff not to discuss the presence of underage content.
Response and Legal Consequences
MindGeek is currently facing multiple class-action lawsuits from underage victims of exploitation and sex trafficking. The videos serve as evidence of the company’s negligence in content moderation. However, a spokesperson for Pornhub denies the allegations made by Rice and Farley, claiming that their statements do not accurately reflect the company’s moderation practices.
Evolution of Internet Standards
The spokesperson acknowledges that before 2020, the company did not have the same stringent protocols in place. However, they assert that verified users with government-issued identification cards are now required to post content, with verification conducted by a third-party organization using biometric facial recognition.
These revelations have sparked outrage and raised serious concerns about the safety and ethical practices of MindGeek and Pornhub. The impact of these videos on ongoing legal battles and the future of the company remains to be seen.
How are advocacy groups and individuals demanding stricter regulations and legal consequences for companies like MindGeek that fail to protect vulnerable individuals
Eek’s Response and Future Plans
Following the release of these videos, MindGeek issued a statement expressing their disappointment in the behavior of the employees featured in the recordings. They emphasized their commitment to ensuring a safe platform for all users and vowed to take immediate action to implement stronger moderation protocols. MindGeek pledged to increase the number of content moderators, enhance training programs, and implement stricter age verification measures. In addition to internal changes, MindGeek plans to collaborate with external organizations specializing in child protection to further improve their moderation system. They recognize the importance of combating child exploitation and reiterate their determination to prevent the presence of underage individuals in videos on their sites. The revelation of MindGeek’s negligence towards underage content moderation has sparked widespread outrage and calls for accountability. Advocacy groups and individuals across the globe are demanding stricter regulations and legal consequences for companies that fail to protect vulnerable individuals. The Canadian government, in particular, is facing pressure to address this issue as MindGeek is based in Montreal. Members of Parliament and child protection organizations are urging the government to tighten regulations and hold companies accountable for their handling of underage content. These revelations highlight the urgent need for stronger measures to protect minors online. With the proliferation of user-generated content, it becomes increasingly challenging to ensure the absence of underage individuals in explicit material. However, it is the responsibility of companies to diligently enforce age verification procedures and establish robust moderation systems to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. The case of MindGeek serves as a wake-up call for the entire adult entertainment industry. It exposes the inherent flaws in self-regulation and emphasizes the necessity for industry-wide standards and oversight. It is crucial for companies to prioritize the safety of their users, particularly those who are susceptible to exploitation, and work collectively to implement proactive measures that prevent the dissemination of underage content. The surfacing of these videos acts as a catalyst for change. It prompts us to scrutinize our existing systems and enact reforms that protect vulnerable individuals. Companies in the adult entertainment industry must learn from this incident and commit to comprehensive policies and practices that prioritize user safety. Governments, too, bear the responsibility of implementing strict regulations and holding companies accountable for their actions. By working together, we can create a safer online environment for all, especially minors who deserve utmost protection.Public Outrage and Calls for Accountability
The Importance of Protecting Minors Online
A Call for Industry-Wide Change
The Way Forward
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Physician's Choice Probiotics 60 Billion CFU - 10 Strains + Organic Prebiotics - Immune, Digestive & Gut Health - Supports Occasional Constipation, Diarrhea, Gas & Bloating - for Women & Men - 30ct
Vital Proteins Collagen Peptides Powder, Promotes Hair, Nail, Skin, Bone and Joint Health, Zero Sugar, Unflavored 19.3 OZ