Merrick Garland defers Hunter Biden’s expired statute of limitations to David Weiss.

Attorney General Merrick Garland Dodges Questions on Hunter Biden Investigation

During​ a heated hearing on Wednesday, ‍Attorney General ⁢Merrick Garland faced accusations from House Judiciary ‌Committee‍ Chairman Jim Jordan⁤ regarding the Department of Justice’s ⁤handling of the statute of limitations for potential charges against ‌Hunter‌ Biden. ​However, instead of providing answers, ‍Garland deferred to special counsel David Weiss, the‍ lead prosecutor in ​the case.

Unanswered Questions Surrounding the Biden Investigations

Despite the pressing inquiries, Garland stated that he did not have the answers and suggested that the appropriate time to address these⁤ concerns would​ be when ⁣speaking directly to Weiss. He assured Jordan that he would have the​ opportunity to ask Weiss ⁣about the allegations at a later date.

During the hearing,⁤ Jordan specifically referenced claims made by two Internal ​Revenue Service criminal investigators, who alleged that the DOJ and IRS had ‌reached an agreement to bring charges ​against Hunter Biden for tax crimes ⁣committed ⁣in 2014 and 2015. The investigators‍ further claimed that the ⁣investigation had been deliberately delayed, resulting‍ in the expiration of the statutes of limitations‌ for those years.

Additional ‌sources, including whistleblowers and an FBI witness,‌ have also suggested ⁣that Weiss was prevented from pursuing charges against Hunter Biden in Washington, D.C., ​and California, where the ‍alleged tax crimes and potential Foreign Agents Registration Act ⁣violations may have occurred.

Despite Republican ​efforts​ to‌ address these concerns, the ongoing status of the Hunter⁣ Biden case and Weiss’s‌ newly granted special counsel authority have‌ shielded the DOJ​ from providing direct answers regarding the claims made by ⁢the IRS whistleblowers.

It is worth noting that during the tax years⁤ in question, Hunter Biden held a prominent position ⁣on‍ the board of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. This has prompted Republicans to launch‍ an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, as they investigate whether he was improperly involved in his son’s business ventures.

Jordan went ‌on to suggest that Weiss intentionally allowed the statutes of limitations to lapse,⁣ emphasizing the potential⁤ implications for the White House. However, ‌prior to his appointment as special⁤ counsel, the DOJ had committed⁣ to having Weiss testify before the committee. ​Republicans have scheduled a meeting⁣ with Weiss in October, where they hope to address these concerns.

While the DOJ has not⁣ withdrawn its offer for Weiss⁤ to testify, it has indicated ‌that it would prefer lawmakers to wait until after Weiss concludes his ‌investigation ⁢of Hunter Biden and issues ⁢the necessary special counsel report.

Recently, ⁣Weiss brought an indictment against‍ Hunter Biden for a 2018 gun incident, and there is speculation that tax charges for‍ the 2017 and⁤ 2018 tax ⁤years may also be forthcoming ⁤based on a failed plea deal filed by Weiss in June.

Click here to read more from‍ The ⁣Washington​ Examiner.

What information does Attorney General Garland have ​regarding the allegations surrounding the Hunter Biden investigation ​and the potential delay in the Department of Justice’s investigation?

Ing in the expiration of the statute of limitations.

Jordan pressed Garland on whether he was aware of these allegations and if the Department of Justice had⁤ intentionally⁤ delayed the investigation. However, Garland refused to provide a direct ⁤response​ and instead stated⁢ that ‍he was not familiar with the details of the case and deferred to ⁢Weiss for any information on⁢ the matter.

This evasion by Garland raises ⁣further questions about the ‍transparency and accountability of the Department ​of Justice​ when it comes to investigating ‌potential ‍wrongdoings by prominent individuals. The American‌ people deserve⁣ to know the truth and have confidence in ‍the fairness and impartiality of the justice‌ system.

It‍ is not uncommon for high-profile cases to face criticism and scrutiny, but it‍ is ⁢crucial ⁢for those⁢ in positions of power and authority to address these ​concerns openly and⁣ honestly. By deferring‌ to Weiss and not providing any substantial information, ⁢Garland is creating an environment of secrecy and doubt.

The fact that the Attorney ​General, ‍the highest-ranking law⁤ enforcement officer in the ⁢country, is unable or unwilling to⁢ answer questions ⁢regarding an ongoing investigation involving a prominent political figure like Hunter Biden‍ is deeply troubling. It raises suspicions of potential ⁤interference and a lack of independence⁢ within the Department of Justice.

The investigation ⁢into ⁣Hunter Biden’s financial dealings has been a topic‍ of discussion and ⁢controversy for ‍quite ​some time. With allegations of tax crimes⁣ and financial⁢ improprieties, it‍ is essential for the Department ‍of Justice to thoroughly ‍and impartially investigate ‍the matter. The American people deserve⁣ to know if any laws ‌have been broken and whether those responsible will be held accountable.

The dodging of⁢ questions by Garland only serves to fuel speculation⁢ and raise‍ doubts about the‌ integrity of the investigation. If the Department of Justice is truly committed to upholding the rule of law, it must demonstrate transparency and address these concerns head-on.

Furthermore, the actions of the Department of Justice in handling this ⁤case are particularly‌ concerning in⁣ light of the past ⁣controversies surrounding Hunter Biden. ​The Biden family has faced allegations of using their political connections and influence for personal gain.⁢ If there is any truth to ⁢these claims, it is imperative that a thorough and unbiased⁣ investigation be conducted.

The American⁣ people deserve a justice system that operates fairly and⁣ without political bias.⁤ It‌ is essential for the Department ⁤of Justice to⁣ address these ​unanswered questions and ⁣reassure the public that the investigation into Hunter Biden is being conducted with the utmost integrity and impartiality.

In‌ conclusion, the evasive tactics employed by ​Attorney General Merrick Garland during ​the House ‍Judiciary Committee hearing regarding the Hunter Biden investigation⁢ are deeply concerning. The American people deserve transparency and accountability from their government officials, ⁤particularly⁢ when it comes to high-profile investigations‌ involving powerful individuals. It is ‌essential for the Department of Justice to address these concerns and demonstrate that ‌it is committed to upholding the‌ rule of law ​without any⁤ political influence. The integrity of the justice system is at stake, and the American people deserve ⁤nothing less than a full and fair investigation into any potential wrongdoings by Hunter Biden.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases