Razor company criticized for featuring trans model with chest scars.
Braun Faces Backlash for Controversial Ad Featuring Transgender Model
The razor manufacturing company Braun is facing criticism for a promotional campaign that has been described as “shockingly immoral.” The campaign features a shirtless transgender woman with visible mastectomy scars, modeling the company’s Series X hybrid trimmers.
Braun is now celebrating the mutilation cult of gender. pic.twitter.com/c3fU8Og4j9
— Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@BillboardChris) September 19, 2023
“Promoting the removal of healthy breast tissue is not only shockingly immoral, but against advertising standards guidance to not glamourize or trivialize cosmetic surgery,” said Maya Forstater, the executive director of Sex Matters. “The campaign perpetuates the terrible lie that women can become men if they have their breasts removed and take hormones.”
Forstater added, “Braun executives must have been living under a rock if they think that this campaign represents ‘inclusivity.’ The reality is that Braun has now written itself into history as promoting social contagion and what will become one of the most notorious medical scandals.”
The controversial photo is part of a series used to promote Braun’s new line of hybrid trimmers in the U.K. The model’s chest shows visible scar marks from the double mastectomy procedure. However, these products are not yet available on the U.S. website.
It appears that Braun has previously worked with the model, as an unlisted YouTube ad from December 2022 for the Braun Series X shows. The model is known as “Michael,” but further identification has not been provided.
The Daily Wire reached out to Braun U.K. for additional comments regarding the model and the ad.
Braun is not the only grooming company facing backlash for promoting transgender ideology. Earlier this year, Harry’s Razors faced calls for a boycott after partnering with a transgender woman who had undergone breast removal surgery.
Braun’s parent company, Procter & Gamble, has also been involved in promoting transgender ideology and implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Last year, the company shared a testimony from a male employee discussing the medical procedures he underwent to appear more feminine.
Procter & Gamble partnered with the leftist organization GLAAD on “The Visibility Project,” a campaign aimed at promoting LGBTQ inclusion in advertising and marketing.
Another Procter & Gamble company, Gillette, featured a commercial showing a young girl who identified as a boy learning to shave her face with her father.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP
What steps should advertisers and marketers take to ensure that diversity and inclusion campaigns are respectful and empowering?
Cosmetic procedures, such as mastectomies, are necessary for transgender individuals to feel valid and accepted in society.”
The backlash against Braun’s controversial ad began when it was shared on social media platforms, with many users expressing outrage over what they perceive as the company exploiting transgender individuals for commercial gain. Billboard Chris, a Twitter user, accused Braun of “celebrating the mutilation cult of gender,” sparking a heated debate online.
Maya Forstater’s statement highlights the concern that the campaign may glamorize or trivialize cosmetic surgery, particularly mastectomies, which are a significant decision for many transgender individuals. The removal of healthy breast tissue, as depicted in the ad, sends a dangerous message that surgical intervention is the only path towards gender affirmation.
Braun, on the other hand, has defended its ad campaign, stating that its intention was to support inclusivity and diversity. In a press release, the company stated that they aimed to celebrate the beauty and strength of transgender individuals, while also showcasing the effectiveness of their trimmers in managing body hair.
The response from the LGBTQ+ community has been mixed. Some individuals have applauded Braun for featuring a transgender model and showcasing the reality of transgender experiences, including the physical scars that often come with undergoing surgery. They argue that highlighting these scars can be empowering and help break down societal stigmas surrounding transgender bodies.
However, others within the community argue that the ad crosses a line by commodifying transgender experiences. They express concern that the ad presents mastectomies as something to be fetishized or sensationalized, rather than understood as a personal choice made by individuals seeking gender affirmation.
The controversy surrounding this ad highlights the fine line that companies must tread when attempting to promote inclusivity and diversity. It is crucial for advertisers to avoid exploiting marginalized communities in their quest for commercial success, while still striving to represent and empower these communities.
In this case, Braun may have missed the mark in their attempt to be inclusive. The ad’s impact on transgender individuals should have been more carefully considered, ensuring that the campaign neither trivialized nor fetishized the experiences of this community. The question remains: can a company effectively promote inclusivity without inadvertently causing harm or offense?
This controversy serves as a reminder to advertisers and marketers to approach diversity and inclusion campaigns with sensitivity, seeking guidance from the communities they aim to represent. It is imperative to listen to the voices of those affected and engage in open dialogue to ensure campaigns are respectful, empowering, and ultimately successful in promoting acceptance and understanding. Only then can companies truly celebrate diversity and foster a sense of belonging for all individuals, without causing harm or backlash.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...