The U.S. Prosecutor Investigating Hunter Biden Not Receiving Assistance from Other Prosecutors, IRS Official Testifies
In newly disclosed testimony, an IRS official informed members of Congress that the U.S. prosecutor investigating President Joe Biden’s son was not receiving help from other U.S. prosecutors. U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, David Weiss, faced obstacles after failed attempts to bring charges against Hunter Biden in two other jurisdictions. The frustration was evident as Weiss had to make decisions on how to proceed.
According to testimony and emails from IRS officials, Weiss had encountered resistance from the U.S. attorney in Washington and the U.S. attorney in central California. Despite working with the IRS to investigate Hunter Biden’s taxes, Weiss had to take action outside his district due to the location of the alleged crimes. However, he was unable to secure the cooperation of a second federal prosecutor to bring charges.
Whistleblower Account
An account provided by whistleblower Gary Shapley, supported by his superior Darrell Waldon, sheds light on the situation. Shapley raised concerns about the improper handling of the case, leading to Weiss’s decision to remove him. The matter has been referred to an inspector general. However, an FBI official present in the meeting contradicted Shapley’s statements.
In his testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, IRS official Michael Batdorf revealed new details about the sequence of events. He confirmed that Weiss had informed him in late 2022 that the U.S. attorney in California had declined to bring charges against Hunter Biden.
U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware David Weiss in a file image. (Department of Justice via The Epoch Times)
Spokespersons for Weiss and the U.S. attorney in California, Martin Estrada, have either declined to comment or not responded to requests for comment.
Weiss ultimately filed tax charges in Delaware, even though the alleged crimes occurred elsewhere. The charges were related to the years 2017 and 2018, with Hunter Biden intentionally evading over $200,000 in taxes. He initially planned to plead guilty but changed his plea to not guilty after a plea deal fell through, which would have resolved a felony gun crime.
Batdorf expressed surprise at Weiss’s decision not to charge Hunter Biden for unpaid taxes in 2014 and 2015, when he received substantial sums from the Ukrainian company Burisma.
Attorney General Testimony
Attorney General Merrick Garland, appointed by President Biden, has maintained that Weiss had the authority to bring charges in any venue. However, Weiss later acknowledged that his charging authority is geographically limited to his home district. He can partner with another U.S. prosecutor and seek special status to pursue charges if the request is rejected.
Following the IRS whistleblowers’ revelations, Weiss was granted special counsel status by Garland. Batdorf testified that he was involved in the decision to remove Shapley from the case, citing Weiss’s lack of trust. However, Shapley’s attorneys argue that it was retaliation for his protected whistleblower disclosures.
Meanwhile, Hunter Biden requested to appear remotely for his arraignment on the new charges, but Weiss’s team opposes the request. Prosecutors argue that in-person appearances have been the norm since June 2022, and there are no valid reasons for a remote appearance in this case.
How did whistleblower Gary Shapley’s concerns about the improper handling of the case impact David Weiss’s investigation of Hunter Biden?
Trict of Delaware, David Weiss, faced challenges in his investigation of Hunter Biden, according to newly disclosed testimony from an IRS official. The testimony revealed that Weiss was not receiving assistance from other U.S. prosecutors in his efforts to bring charges against the President’s son.
Weiss had encountered resistance from the U.S. attorney in Washington and the U.S. attorney in central California, as per testimony and emails from IRS officials. Despite collaborating with the IRS to investigate Hunter Biden’s taxes, Weiss had to take action outside his district due to the alleged location of the crimes. However, he was unable to secure the cooperation of a second federal prosecutor to bring charges against Hunter Biden.
The situation was further complicated by whistleblower Gary Shapley, who raised concerns about the improper handling of the case. Shapley’s superior, Darrell Waldon, supported his account and shed light on the matter. This resulted in Weiss’s decision to remove Shapley from the investigation. The case has since been referred to an inspector general. However, an FBI official present at the meeting contradicted Shapley’s statements.
Testifying before the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, IRS official Michael Batdorf revealed new details about the sequence of events. He confirmed that Weiss had informed him in late 2022 that the U.S. attorney in California had declined to bring charges against Hunter Biden.
These revelations highlight the challenges faced by the U.S. prosecutor in investigating Hunter Biden. The lack of cooperation from other prosecutors and the resistance encountered from various parties have hindered the progress of the investigation. In order to ensure a fair and thorough examination, it is crucial that all relevant parties cooperate and assist in the pursuit of justice.
The investigation into Hunter Biden’s alleged crimes has garnered significant attention, given his familial connection to President Joe Biden. It is essential that the investigation is conducted without bias or interference, allowing the truth to prevail. The American people deserve confidence in the integrity of the justice system, and it is the responsibility of all involved to ensure a transparent and fair process.
As the investigation unfolds, the public eagerly awaits the outcome and hopes for a resolution that upholds the principles of justice. The U.S. prosecutor, David Weiss, continues to face significant challenges in his pursuit of justice, but it is crucial that the investigation is conducted thoroughly and impartially. Only by doing so can the truth be revealed and justice be served.
