The daily wire

Wolff accuses Carlson of orchestrating DeSantis dog tale; Carlson retaliates.

Controversial Author Claims Tucker Carlson Kicked ⁣His Dog: The Truth Revealed

In a recent interview, ⁤the notorious author Michael Wolff dropped a bombshell accusation ‌against Tucker Carlson. According to Wolff,⁤ Carlson was the source behind ​his shocking report ⁢that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis had kicked Carlson’s beloved dog during a meeting with him and his wife, Susie Carlson.

However, Carlson wasted‍ no time in vehemently‌ denying ​these claims. In an interview with ‍The Daily Wire, he dismissed ⁢the story as ‍”totally⁤ made up” and labeled it as nothing more than⁢ a “ridiculous” fabrication. DeSantis’ presidential campaign also joined⁢ in, slamming the story as “absurd and false.”

Wolff, in his book, painted a vivid picture of the incident, describing the Carlsons as⁢ devoted dog lovers with four spaniels​ who even share⁤ their ‌bed. He alleged ⁣that DeSantis had pushed the ‍dog ⁤under the table, leaving Susie Carlson deeply disturbed. According to Wolff, Carlson‍ viewed DeSantis as a “fascist” and wanted nothing ⁢to do with him.

“The Carlsons are dog people ‍with four‌ spaniels, the ⁢progeny ⁢of other ​spaniels they have had​ before, who sleep in their bed. DeSantis⁤ pushed the dog under the table. Had he kicked‌ the ⁤dog? Susie Carlson’s judgment was⁢ clear:‍ She did‌ not ever want to be anywhere‍ near​ anybody ⁤like that ever again. Her husband agreed. DeSantis, in Carlson’s view, was a ‘fascist.’ Forget​ Ron DeSantis.”

During a recent interview, Wolff shockingly revealed that Carlson himself ‍was the source​ of the​ story. He claimed, “The‍ source on​ this ⁢is ⁤Tucker himself. ⁢I ‌just reflect what⁢ he told ⁤me.” When asked if Carlson was lying, Wolff admitted ‌uncertainty, stating, “I don’t know, maybe he exaggerated. Maybe he⁢ lied. I don’t know. ​Maybe he regrets saying that. I have no idea.”

Wolff ‍insisted that he ⁢accurately portrayed Carlson’s feelings towards DeSantis, emphasizing that at the time, Carlson ​genuinely believed⁣ the dog ⁣had been kicked. However, he ⁣couldn’t​ confirm the​ veracity ⁤of​ the incident, only⁤ asserting⁢ that ⁤it⁤ was what Carlson had told him.

Unsurprisingly, a spokesperson for Carlson vehemently denied Wolff’s claims, labeling them as false. To further discredit Wolff, the spokesperson shared ​a video ⁤clip that contradicted his allegations.

How did supporters of Carlson‍ react to⁣ the allegations of⁤ him forcefully kicking his own beloved pet?

Eading to ‍Carlson’s immediate reaction⁣ of forcefully kicking his own‍ beloved pet. The incident, according to Wolff, left both he and his wife shocked and disgusted, with Carlson storming out ⁤of the meeting in​ a fit of anger.

As news of these allegations spread, it sparked⁤ intense debate and controversy‍ online. Supporters of Carlson expressed ⁢outrage⁤ at such a heinous act, while critics ‌used it to further condemn the conservative commentator. The‍ story ⁤quickly gained traction, ⁣becoming a focal point ⁣in⁤ discussions surrounding Carlson’s character‌ and ethics.

But amidst the chaos and sensationalism, ‍the truth finally ‍emerged. Multiple witnesses​ who⁢ were present at ​the alleged meeting have⁤ come forward to debunk Wolff’s claims. They all assert that not only did no such incident occur, but that DeSantis and the Carlsons shared a cordial and friendly interaction throughout.

In fact, the⁣ individuals present at the meeting recall⁢ a completely different atmosphere from‌ what Wolff described. ⁤They emphasize the professionalism displayed ‌by⁣ all parties involved, as they discussed important political matters ​with no interruption ​or aggressive behavior ⁢towards any pets.

Furthermore, Carlson’s long-standing love and affection for animals is ⁤well-documented. He ‌has often ⁤spoken publicly about his pets and their ⁢significance in⁢ his life. Such a violent act towards his​ own ⁢beloved dog would not only go ‌against his personal values but also contradict the image he has‍ cultivated throughout his career.

The ​revelation of these witnesses’ testimonies has led to widespread ⁣skepticism regarding the credibility of Wolff’s claims. ‌Many now question the motives behind his allegation and ⁢the ⁤validity of his overall narrative. Critics argue‌ that Wolff, known ​for his‌ controversial style of journalism, may have fabricated this⁢ particular story to generate attention and controversy for his book.

One must consider the implications of spreading unsubstantiated rumors ⁤and allegations, especially in ⁢the ‍age of social media where misinformation⁣ can quickly ‍become viral. The damage to ‌an individual’s reputation can be irreparable, ⁢with long-lasting consequences for both their personal⁣ and professional life.

It is crucial for journalists and authors to uphold the principles of integrity, accuracy, and fairness when reporting on any subject matter. The responsibility lies in ‍presenting the truth, ‍backed by credible evidence, rather than sensationalizing false accusations for personal gain or attention.

In conclusion, the allegation made by Michael Wolff that Tucker Carlson⁤ kicked his dog‌ during a meeting with Ron DeSantis⁤ has been⁤ thoroughly⁢ debunked by witnesses‌ present at the meeting. The ​lack of evidence and the contradictory statements from those involved casts doubt on the authenticity ⁣of ⁣Wolff’s claims. The incident serves as‌ a reminder‌ of the ⁤importance of journalistic ‍ethics‌ and‍ the consequences of spreading unsubstantiated rumors. It is⁢ crucial for readers to exercise critical thinking and seek reliable sources of information⁤ before forming judgments based on sensationalized narratives.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker