Trans activist upset by Dax Shepard’s inquiry on teens’ changing perspectives.
Trans activist Jonathan Van Ness breaks down in tears during podcast discussion on trans ideology
In a recent episode of Dax Shepard’s podcast, “Armchair Expert,” Jonathan Van Ness, a prominent trans activist, became emotional when Shepard questioned the logic of pushing trans ideology on vulnerable teens who may change their minds later.
The conversation arose while they were discussing whether The New York Times was truly left-leaning, as Van Ness believed the outlet had published some “anti-trans” articles. Shepard argued that these articles were merely posing questions and challenging extreme stances, such as allowing teenagers to undergo irreversible puberty blockers.
“How do we know that the person’s not gonna change their mind?” Shepard asked, expressing discomfort with the idea of teenagers transitioning. “To be critical or to question it doesn’t make you an enemy. I don’t think that’s the way forward,” he added.
Van Ness, who identifies as a “non-binary” trans person and demands the use of they/them pronouns, responded, “I feel like I’m talking to my dad.” They emphasized the prevalence of misinformation and disinformation surrounding the anti-trans backlash.
Later in the conversation, Van Ness clarified that they were not calling Shepard a transphobe but highlighted the existence of transphobic ideologies and beliefs that can be unknowingly held. Shepard reassured Van Ness of his support for trans rights and apologized for unintentionally starting a debate.
Van Ness became overwhelmed with emotion and tearfully expressed their wish for people to be as passionate about inclusivity for children as they are about fairness in women’s sports. They emphasized that holding transphobic beliefs doesn’t necessarily make someone a bad person.
How did Dax Shepard question the logic of pushing trans ideology on vulnerable teens?
In a recent episode of Dax Shepard’s podcast, “Armchair Expert,” prominent trans activist Jonathan Van Ness broke down in tears during a discussion on trans ideology. This emotional moment occurred when Shepard questioned the logic of pushing trans ideology on vulnerable teens who may change their minds later.
The conversation began when they were talking about whether The New York Times was truly left-leaning. Van Ness believed that the outlet had published some “anti-trans” articles. However, Shepard argued that these articles were simply posing questions and challenging extreme stances, such as allowing teenagers to undergo irreversible puberty blockers.
Shepard expressed discomfort with the idea of teenagers transitioning and asked, “How do we know that the person’s not gonna change their mind?” He emphasized that being critical or questioning the matter doesn’t make one an enemy. Van Ness, who identifies as a “non-binary” trans person and demands the use of they/them pronouns, response highlighted the prevalence of misinformation and disinformation surrounding the anti-trans backlash.
Later in the conversation, Van Ness clarified that they were not calling Shepard a transphobe but wanted to highlight the existence of transphobic ideologies and beliefs that can be unknowingly held. Shepard reassured Van Ness of his support for trans rights and apologized for unintentionally starting a debate.
At this point, Van Ness became overwhelmed with emotion and tearfully expressed their wish for people to be as passionate about inclusivity for children as they are about fairness in women’s sports. They emphasized that holding transphobic beliefs doesn’t necessarily make someone a bad person.
This podcast discussion sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding trans rights and the challenges faced by trans individuals, particularly transgender teenagers. The topic of whether teenagers should be allowed to undergo irreversible medical treatments and hormonal therapies is a sensitive one, and it is imperative to approach it with empathy, understanding, and a willingness to listen to different perspectives.
The emotional response of Jonathan Van Ness during the discussion reflects the deep-seated emotions and personal struggles that many trans individuals face in a society that is still evolving in terms of acceptance and understanding. It serves as a reminder of the importance of fostering an inclusive and respectful dialogue, even when discussing controversial topics.
As the conversation on trans rights continues, it is crucial to educate ourselves, challenge our own biases, and engage in open and respectful discussions. By doing so, we can move towards a society that embraces and supports all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...