X brutally corrects ‘Queer Eye’ star’s claim that trans athletes lack advantage over women.

Transgender Athletes Have Biological ⁤Advantage, Social Media Platform X Responds to Jonathan Van Ness

In a recent appearance on⁤ actor ‍Dax Shepard’s “Armchair Expert” podcast, “Queer Eye” star Jonathan Van Ness claimed that transgender women do not ‌hold an unfair biological advantage over cis women. However, social media platform X has countered this claim, stating that biologically male transgender⁤ athletes do indeed‍ have an advantage over their female competitors.

X attached an “added context” ‌note to their⁤ post, highlighting decades ‍of research that has ‌consistently shown males ‍to be stronger and more physically agile than females in most sports. Since transwomen are biologically male, they naturally possess a physical advantage over females in athletic competitions.

After receiving backlash, X updated their “added context” to emphasize the well-known biological differences between males and females, which contribute to males having greater strength and speed on average.

Jonathan Van Ness: “The science that we have now says that transgender women do not hold an unfair biological advantage over cis women.” – Variety

A⁤ report⁢ by Dr. Gregory Brown, a professor of exercise science at the University of ‍Nebraska,‍ further supports X’s stance. The report reveals that males have physical advantages over females in athletic competition, even after testosterone suppression. For example, males have a 15-20% jumping ‍advantage⁣ over women, with male volleyball players jumping 50% higher than their female counterparts in a ​vertical “attack” toward the net.

During the podcast, Van Ness became emotional when discussing gender transitions ⁤for minors. Shepard questioned the certainty of teenagers’ decisions ‍and expressed the ‍need for critical thinking. Van Ness⁤ responded by highlighting the‍ presence of misinformation and disinformation surrounding the anti-trans backlash.

Van Ness also criticized Shepard for entertaining questions on the ‌trans issue, stating that one can​ hold transphobic ideologies without being explicitly transphobic. Van Ness expressed frustration, wishing that people would prioritize inclusivity for children ​over concerns about fairness in women’s sports.

Related: Trans Activist Cries, Complains When Dax Shepard‍ Asks About Teens Changing ⁣Their Minds Later

How effective⁤ is‍ hormone therapy in⁣ eliminating the‌ biological advantages‌ acquired during ​male puberty in transgender women athletes?

Physically stronger and faster than females. They argued that⁢ even after undergoing hormone⁤ therapy, transgender ‍women retain some of ⁢the biological advantages they acquired ​during male puberty.

The debate surrounding transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports has been a contentious issue for years. Proponents of inclusion argue ‌that categorizing athletes based on their sex assigned at birth is discriminatory ⁤and denies transgender individuals the right to compete. On ⁣the other hand, opponents ⁣assert that allowing transgender women to participate⁤ in women’s sports can compromise the ⁤fairness and integrity of female competition.

To support their claim, X referenced several studies that have ⁣found significant differences ‌between⁣ male and female athletes’ physiological capabilities. The research consistently demonstrates that⁢ males tend to have larger bones, greater muscle mass, and higher levels of testosterone. These physical ⁢attributes contribute‍ to increased strength, ⁤speed, and endurance, providing ⁢male⁢ athletes with⁣ a distinct advantage over⁢ their female counterparts.

Critics⁢ argue​ that hormone therapy, which⁢ transgender women undergo ‍as part of their gender ‌transition, eliminates the biological ​advantages acquired during male puberty. While hormone therapy does result in reductions in muscle mass and testosterone levels, X contends that these changes⁤ do not completely level the playing field. ⁤They maintain that⁤ even with reduced hormone levels, transgender women still possess physical attributes that‌ give them an edge over cisgender ​women.

Social‌ media ⁣platform X’s response to⁣ Jonathan Van⁣ Ness garnered mixed reactions from users. Some praised the platform for shedding‌ light⁢ on ⁢the biological⁤ disparities between transgender‍ and cisgender athletes, claiming that it​ was ⁣essential to protect ​the integrity of ​women’s ⁣sports. Others criticized X for perpetuating stereotypes and stigmatizing transgender individuals.

Individuals who are supportive⁣ of ‌transgender inclusion argue that focusing solely‌ on ⁣biology neglects the broader concept ⁣of gender identity. They‌ emphasize the importance of recognizing individuals based on their affirmed gender‌ and affirm that transgender women are women, irrespective of their biological ​differences. These ‍supporters assert ‍that ⁢policies should be ​developed ⁢to promote ‍inclusion while also maintaining⁤ fair competition.

As⁤ the⁤ debate over transgender athletes’‍ participation‍ in women’s sports continues, it is crucial to ⁤find a balance ​between inclusivity‌ and fairness.​ While it is essential to acknowledge and respect individuals’ gender identities, it is imperative to consider the ‌potential advantages that may exist due to biological disparities. Striking this balance will require thorough research, thoughtful policy ⁤development, and‍ open dialogue among ⁤stakeholders‌ from all perspectives.

In conclusion, the assertion made⁣ by‌ social media platform X ⁢that⁤ male​ transgender athletes possess ‍biological advantages over⁣ cis women is supported by scientific⁤ evidence. The argument that hormone therapy entirely negates these advantages is contested. As society grapples with inclusivity and fair competition, it is important to have open​ and respectful discussions regarding the complexities of ‍transgender participation in women’s sports.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases