Conservative News Daily

GOP debate contenders demand Trump’s presence, engage in fiery dispute over… curtains.

Have you ever come out of a terrible movie and⁤ turned to your significant other and quipped, “Well, there’s two hours of my life I’ll never get back?”

At approximately​ 11 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, untold numbers of Republican couples across America turned to one ⁢another and said just that.

The second GOP presidential debate —‍ sans Donald Trump, ⁣of course — ended way past many Americans’‌ bedtimes, and if you stayed up ⁤to watch it, well, the best I can say ⁢is that you’ve definitely done more than your civic responsibility for the ‍week.

Yes, several candidates made salient points over the two-hour affair at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library ⁢in‌ Simi Valley, California. They were mostly drowned out by campaign talking points ⁣that any sufficiently trained parrot could recite.

Finally, a group of conservative politicians willing to take a bold stand against fentanyl addiction, the Chinese Communist Party and ‌illegal immigration. It’s high time someone had the courage to say those things.

If there was⁤ one thing you⁢ could find some agreement on, when‌ the candidates were asked, it’s that ⁤2024 front-runner and former President Donald Trump should have been there.

Take Florida Gov. Ron​ DeSantis, a distant second to Trump in polling. While noting that President Joe Biden “is completely missing in action in leadership,” ⁣he also ⁤alleged Biden wasn’t the only one.

“And you ⁤know who else is missing in action?” DeSantis ⁣ said. “Donald Trump is missing in action. He should be on this stage tonight.

“He owes it to you to explain his record where they added $7.8 trillion to the debt, that set the stage for the inflation that we have now,” he‍ continued, ⁢to applause.⁢ “I⁣ can tell you this, ⁢as governor of Florida: We cut ‍taxes, we ran surpluses.”

DeSantis wasn’t the ⁣only one spoiling for a fight with Trump. In what had to be the second-most cringeworthy moment‍ of the night, former New Jersey ⁢Gov. Chris Christie said that, if Trump kept missing debates, he’d earn the nickname “Donald⁢ Duck.”

“I’ll look in the camera right now and tell you, Donald, I know you’re watching,” said Christie, ‍trying on his faux-New Jersey tough guy persona.⁣ “You can’t help yourself. I‍ know ⁢you’re watching.⁢ OK?

“And you’re⁢ not‍ here tonight ‍not because of polls and not because of your indictments, you’re not here ‌tonight because⁣ you’re afraid of being on this stage and defending your record,” he continued. “You’re ducking these things. And let me tell you what’s gonna happen: Nobody up here is gonna call you Donald Trump ​anymore, we’re gonna ​call you ‍Donald Duck.”

Oh ho‍ ho.⁣ Get it? I see what he did there.‍ Yes, ⁢Chris Christie has​ four ⁤children and I’m sure ‌he’s a devoted ​father, but we didn’t need his⁢ dad jokes to un-enliven what was already a‌ banal, platitudinous night.

And ⁣here’s the thing: Neither Christie nor DeSantis is right.

Did you watch the Republican ⁤debate?

function ffp_getCookie(cname) {
var name=cname + “=”;
var decodedCookie=decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
var ca=decodedCookie.split(‘;’);
for(var i=0; i

In the first place, according to RealClearPolitics, Trump‌ sits at 56.6 percent in an average of polls, over 42 points ahead‌ of second-place DeSantis. What’s more, he’s the only ⁤person who would ‍have been on stage who would have⁤ had presidential experience to defend. Republican voters have already seen his record — and, for the moment, ​they see no better alternative.

Secondly, what Trump missed⁢ was, inter‌ alia, a very important, very heated debate between two South Carolinians over … curtains.

The two South ‍Carolinians in the race — Sen. Tim Scott and Nikki Haley, the Palmetto State’s former governor who also served as U.S. ambassador to⁤ the United Nations during the Trump administration — got into an unfriendly exchange over whether Haley had ⁤overspent on curtains for the residence of the U.N. ambassador.

“Talk about ‍someone who has never seen a federal dollar she doesn’t like,” ​Scott said.

“Bring it, Tim!” ‍Haley responded.

“You literally put $50,000 on curtains,” ⁤Scott said.

When Haley noted that ‌this was “bad information,” Scott⁣ urged people‌ to ⁢“just go to YouTube.”

Just to⁤ be clear here: If curtains are indeed going to ⁢be a deciding​ factor in how you cast your primary vote, The Hill notes that the purchase of the expensive window ⁢treatments‌ in question was made before Haley’s time as U.N. ambassador, during the Obama administration.

(If you want to‌ go to ‌YouTube, feel free. There’s probably a hilarious video of a cat dancing along to Dr. Dre’s “Nuthin’ But a ‘G’ Thang” going viral, or something like that.)

The fact is, however, Scott vs. Haley ​on Curtaingate was the defining moment‍ of Wednesday’s debate — not in terms of who spent the 50 grand on the ⁢curtains, mind you, but on summing ​up the whole experience.

Yes, some candidates managed to make salient points during the two-hour event.‍ But if ⁢you missed it, let me sum it up for you:

Fentanyl bad. “My record good.” Chinese Communist Party bad. “My record on China good. His record on China bad.” Fentanyl very bad. “My⁤ record good.” ​ Bidenomics ⁢bad. “My economic record good.”‍ Also, Doug‍ Bergum ‍desperately trying to ⁢get‍ the attention of anyone who would listen on energy.

Each ‌of these candidates are, at best, 42 points behind Trump in the RealClearPolitics polling aggregate.

Some of them made good arguments that bear repeating ​and examination over the days to⁣ come, ‍but none of them made a convincing argument that will change the rankings.

Why, then, would Trump show up? To avouch that he’d pay for his own ⁣curtains? Or to laugh Chris Christie ⁤ out of the Reagan Library⁣ for that cringe-viral “Donald‌ Duck” line?

Because those were the two best answers the people on stage⁣ seemed to⁢ provide Wednesday night.

.author_subscription_pitch p{margin:5px;}

An Urgent Note from Our Staff:

The Western Journal has been ‌labeled “dangerous” simply because we have a Biblical worldview and speak truth about what is happening in America.

We refuse to ⁣let big ‍tech and woke advertisers dictate the content we⁤ share with our community. We stand for truth. We stand ⁣for freedom. ⁢We stand⁣ with our readers.

We’re asking⁢ you ‍to help us in this fight. We can’t do this without you.

Your donation directly helps fund ⁣our Editorial team of writers and editors. Your support means we can continue to⁢ expose false narratives and defend⁣ traditional American values.

Please stand with us⁤ by donating today.

Thank you for your support!

The post⁤ GOP Debate⁢ Contenders Insist Trump Should Have Shown Up, Then Have Heated Exchange Over… Curtains ⁢appeared first on The Western Journal.

Why did ⁤most candidates agree that​ Donald Trump should have been present at the ⁤debate

Have you⁤ ever come out of a terrible movie and turned to ⁢your significant other and quipped,⁤ “Well,‍ there’s two hours of‍ my life⁢ I’ll⁣ never get ⁤back?” If you have,‌ then you‍ can probably relate to the feelings of countless Republican ​couples across America who watched the second GOP presidential debate‍ without Donald Trump.

The debate, which ended‌ past many Americans’ bedtimes, was ‌filled with the⁣ usual ⁣campaign talking ⁢points that any well-trained parrot could‍ recite. ⁤However, there ⁤were ‍some candidates who managed to make ⁢salient⁣ points amidst the noise.

One thing that⁣ most candidates seemed to agree ​on was that Donald Trump should‍ have been present at the debate. Even Ron DeSantis, the current front-runner for⁣ the 2024 presidential race and a​ distant second to Trump in polling, expressed his disappointment in Trump’s absence.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker