The epoch times

Federal judge blocks ExxonMobil’s crude trucking plan in Central California.

ExxonMobil Loses Bid to Transport Crude Oil, Judge Upholds Permit‍ Denial

In a blow to ExxonMobil, the energy giant’s latest attempt to transport millions of barrels⁢ of crude oil from offshore platforms off the central California⁢ coast to state refineries ⁤has been denied. Judge ‌Dolly ⁢Gee in the U.S. District ​Court in Los Angeles rejected the company’s request for summary judgment, upholding Santa Barbara County’s decision‍ to deny ExxonMobil a permit to restart offshore⁣ oil production⁢ platforms and transport oil by tanker ⁤truck⁢ through central California.

The county supervisors expressed concerns about the potential for oil spills ‍and accidents​ along trucking routes, particularly on State Route 166, ‌a narrow two-lane highway with challenging terrain and limited passing‍ lanes. ExxonMobil estimated that around ​70 trucks‍ would be used ⁤daily to transport the oil.

Related ​Stories

  • New California Oil Price⁤ Czar​ Reports Market Fluctuations⁣ Impacting‌ Gas ‍Price Hikes – Find out how market‍ fluctuations are affecting gas prices ⁣in California.
  • California Oil Well Drilling Comes to ⁢a Halt After Drill Permit Stall ​- Learn about the ​halt in oil well ⁢drilling​ in California due ⁢to⁢ permit issues.

The legal battle between ExxonMobil and Santa Barbara ‌County began‍ after the county denied the company’s permit ‌in May⁢ 2022. ExxonMobil accused the supervisors⁤ of abusing their discretion and not considering ⁣the permit on ‍its own merits, but rather as ‍a referendum on offshore crude ⁢oil production.

ExxonMobil’s⁣ troubles in Santa Barbara County started in 2015 when a pipeline ⁢owned ‍by Plains All⁤ American Pipeline ruptured, causing a‍ massive crude oil spill on⁢ Refugio⁣ Beach and ​into the ⁢Pacific Ocean.‌ The spill, which affected‍ a​ biologically diverse area, led to the closure of offshore drilling platforms, ⁣beaches, and recreational activities.

Since‌ the spill, ExxonMobil has been⁣ unable ‌to use ⁤its ‍pipelines for oil transportation⁣ and halted production in the county. ⁢The company sought a permit in 2017 to transport⁤ crude ‌oil by truck to processing​ plants ⁢in Santa Maria or Kern‍ County. Additionally, ​ExxonMobil aimed to ⁣restart ‌a production unit in ‌Santa Ynez,​ reopen a processing facility, and resume operations on three offshore platforms.

The federal judge ruled that ExxonMobil‌ did not have a ‍vested right to transport oil by ​truck,⁢ as ⁤the original permit‍ only‌ allowed transportation through pipelines. ‍The judge stated that the county’s decision was supported by substantial evidence regarding traffic‍ safety.

Environmental groups celebrated the judge’s decision,‍ emphasizing⁣ the ​potential dangers and risks associated with ExxonMobil’s plan. Linda ‌Krop, chief counsel for the⁤ Environmental Defense Center, representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, ⁤expressed relief and highlighted the numerous accidents ​involving ⁣tanker trucks along the proposed​ route in recent years.

ExxonMobil has not provided a comment on the ⁣ruling.

What⁤ are ⁤the ⁣concerns and opposition faced by ExxonMobil ⁢in their oil production and transport activities, and how do these challenges reflect⁤ the increasing scrutiny and tougher⁢ regulations ​on the fossil fuel industry

Regulations Tighten‍,‍ Impacting‌‌ Production⁤ and‍ Revenue‍ – Learn about the new regulations on oil well production in California and its‍ impact on ⁢the industry.

  • California⁣ Set‍ to Ban Fracking‍ by 2024‍​​ – ‍Discover the plans to ‍ban fracking in California by 2024 ​and the implications​ for ⁢the oil ⁢and gas industry.
  • ExxonMobil ⁤has been facing increasing scrutiny⁣ and opposition‍ from environmental groups, local communities,⁣ and lawmakers over its oil ​production and ‍transport activities. The company’s attempt⁤ to restart offshore⁣‌ oil production⁢ platforms off the central California⁢ coast was⁤ met with strong resistance, with concerns⁢ over potential ecological damage and harm to‌ marine life.

    Furthermore,⁤ the transportation of oil by tanker ⁤truck⁢ through central California raised significant safety ‌concerns among the county supervisors. The narrow, winding highways coupled with heavy traffic pose ‌substantial risks for accidents and oil spills, further exacerbating the opposition to ExxonMobil’s plans.

    In her ruling, Judge ‌Dolly ⁢Gee emphasized the importance⁣ of ⁣considering environmental impacts and public​ safety when making decisions on oil production and transport permits. She stated that Santa Barbara County’s decision to deny⁣ ExxonMobil a permit was made based on thorough evaluations of potential⁤ risks and in the interest of ​protecting the community and⁢ the ​environment.

    This ruling comes‍ at a time when⁢ California⁤ is intensifying its efforts to transition away from fossil fuels ‌and tackle climate change. The state ⁤has set ambitious goals ​to reduce greenhouse gas ‌emissions and promote renewable​ energy ‌sources. In line with these ⁢objectives, California is taking steps to ⁤tighten regulations on oil production and transport to mitigate‌ environmental risks⁢ and promote sustainable​ practices.

    ExxonMobil’s loss in this bid to transport crude oil reminds us​ of the increasing challenges faced by the fossil ⁣fuel‍ industry.⁣ As global ‍concerns about climate change and environmental impacts grow, companies like ExxonMobil face mounting opposition and tougher regulations. This decision also highlights the importance of local communities and their ability ⁤to influence and shape energy policies and projects that directly impact ⁢their lives and environment.

    The denial of ExxonMobil’s⁢ permit reinforces the notion​ that lasting solutions to our energy needs require careful⁣ consideration of the environmental,​ public health, and safety aspects. It serves as a reminder that the transition to a cleaner ⁢and more sustainable energy future necessitates not just changes in ​technology ‍and infrastructure, but also comprehensive⁢ evaluations of the potential risks and benefits associated with each energy project.

    About ExxonMobil

    ExxonMobil is one of⁤ the world’s largest​ publicly traded international oil and ‌gas companies. Founded in 1999 through the merger of Exxon and‍ Mobil,⁤ the company ‌operates in all aspects of the oil and gas industry, including exploration, production, ⁣refining, and ​marketing. With its headquarters​ in Irving, Texas, ExxonMobil ‍operates in ⁤multiple countries around the world and has a significant presence in the United States.

    About Santa Barbara ⁢County

    Santa Barbara County is located along the central coast⁤ of ⁣California and is known for its scenic coastline, wine country, and diverse ecosystems. The ⁢county has a rich history in the oil industry, but in recent years, there has been a ‌growing emphasis on environmental sustainability​ and reducing ⁣the environmental impacts ⁢of⁣ oil production and transport activities.

    With its decision to⁢ deny ExxonMobil’s permit, Santa Barbara County has underscored its commitment to protecting its communities and environment, while also aligning with California’s ‍broader efforts to transition to a cleaner energy future.



    " Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
    *As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

    Related Articles

    Sponsored Content
    Back to top button
    Available for Amazon Prime
    Close

    Adblock Detected

    Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker