GOP majority disagrees with presidential primary voters on Ukraine.
Republicans in Congress Divided on Aid to Ukraine
A majority of Republicans in Congress continue to back aiding and arming Ukraine, in stark contrast to GOP presidential primary voters who overwhelmingly appear to favor candidates who want to end or lessen that support.
REPUBLICAN DEBATE: TOP THREE TAKEAWAYS FROM THE CANDIDATES’ LATEST MEETING
The House ultimately voted 311-117 to provide $300 million in aid to Ukraine in a stand-alone bill on Thursday, with every vote against the measure coming from the GOP.
The funding had been stripped from the annual defense spending bill in an effort to appease those hard-line conservatives who voted against the measure anyway. Earlier in the process of getting it passed, 93 House Republicans voted in favor of a failed amendment from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) that ultimately would have prohibited security assistance to Ukraine, while 104 voted in favor of another failed amendment from Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) that would have stripped the Ukraine money from the larger spending bill, which ultimately happened anyway and passed as a stand-alone.
Despite the vocal minority, most of the party not only supports aiding Ukraine but believes President Joe Biden is only doing enough to prevent a Ukrainian defeat, not to assist in their victory.
But that shrinking majority is seemingly at odds with their base, which, based on most polling of the GOP presidential primary, is gravitating toward candidates who seemingly want to lessen such assistance to Ukraine.
In this week’s second presidential primary debate, the majority of candidates, mainly those with limited support, aggressively defended such assistance and insisted it’s vital for U.S. national security.
Former President Donald Trump, the overwhelming favorite for the nomination, has said he’d be able to end the war in 24 hours, though the only plans he’s shared publicly on how he’d do that include threatening to cut off aid to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and telling Russian leader Vladimir Putin that he’d increase aid to Kyiv.
“I know Zelensky very well, and I know Putin very well, even better. And I had a good relationship, very good with both of them. I would tell Zelensky no more. You got to make a deal. I would tell Putin, if you don’t make a deal, we’re going to give him a lot. We’re going to [give Ukraine] more than they ever got if we have to. I will have the deal done in one day. One day,” Trump said in August.
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), generally polling in second at 14%, per RealClearPolitics, and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, currently in fourth place at 5.1%, both indicated on Wednesday night that they don’t support continuing aid to Ukraine as the Biden administration is currently doing.
“The reality is just because Putin is an evil dictator does not mean that Ukraine is good,” Ramaswamy said during the debate, while the Florida governor was critical of Europe’s assistance to Ukraine, saying, “I’m going to have Europe step up and do their job.”
More traditional Republicans, such as former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and former Vice President Mike Pence all said at the debate that continuing to help Ukraine is in the U.S.’s national security interest. For the most part, no candidate in this group reaches double digits in presidential polling.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
“The naivete on the stage from some of these folks is extraordinary,” Christie said, while Scott confirmed that “degrading the Russian military” is in the U.S. national interest, adding it would “actually keep our homeland safer.”
The polling suggests that even if Trump doesn’t get the nomination, maintaining aid to Ukraine will likely be on the ballot come next November.
How does the divide within the Republican Party on aid to Ukraine reflect broader debates about America’s role in the world and the direction of US foreign policy?
Withdraw aid to Ukraine unless they investigated his political rival, Joe Biden. Trump’s stance on aid to Ukraine has been a point of contention within the Republican Party, with some members supporting his approach and others expressing concerns about the implications for US national security.
The divide among Republicans in Congress reflects a larger disagreement within the party on foreign policy and national security issues. While many Republican lawmakers believe in the importance of assisting Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression, some primary voters are more inclined toward a more isolationist approach.
This divide was evident in the recent Republican debate, where candidates clashed on the issue of aid to Ukraine. While some candidates defended the need for continued assistance, others advocated for a reduction or elimination of aid. It is worth noting that the candidates who were more critical of aid to Ukraine tended to have less support in the primary race.
While the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to support aid to Ukraine, it is clear that there is a growing disconnect between party leadership and some primary voters on this issue. This divide raises questions about the future direction of the Republican Party and its stance on foreign policy matters.
As the primary season continues and the race for the Republican nomination intensifies, it will be interesting to see how candidates navigate this division within their party. Will they continue to advocate for a strong US commitment to Ukraine, or will they adopt a more isolationist stance in order to appeal to their base?
Ultimately, the question of aid to Ukraine is not just a policy dispute within the Republican Party, but also a reflection of broader debates about America’s role in the world. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected and global challenges grow, it is important for policymakers to carefully consider the implications of their decisions on national security and international relations.
The Republican Party, like any political party, is not monolithic, and disagreements on policy are to be expected. However, it is crucial for Republicans to find common ground on foreign policy matters and present a unified front to the American people. Only by doing so can the party effectively address the complex challenges facing the United States and protect its national security interests.
In the context of aid to Ukraine, Republicans must strike a balance between supporting Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression and ensuring that US interests are protected. This requires thoughtful and nuanced policy discussions, as well as a willingness to listen to different perspectives within the party.
The question of aid to Ukraine is not a simple one, and the Republican Party must grapple with this complexity in order to effectively govern and lead. The divide within the party on this issue reflects broader debates about America’s role in the world and the direction of US foreign policy. As Republicans navigate this division, they must remember the importance of unity and coherence in order to effectively represent the interests of the American people.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...