An Election Integrity Group Sues Hawaii for Withholding Voter Records
An election integrity group has filed a lawsuit against Hawaii, accusing the state of violating the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) by refusing to release voter records. The legal complaint, filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) in U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, alleges that Hawaii conducts its elections in secrecy.
The president of PILF, J. Christian Adams, a former civil rights attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, expressed concern over the lack of transparency in Hawaii’s elections. He emphasized the importance of public access to voter rolls, stating that PILF has successfully fought for this transparency in three other states.
According to Section 8 of the NVRA, states are required to maintain and provide public access to voter registration records. The PILF’s legal complaint argues that Hawaii’s denial of access to the voter roll violates this provision. The complaint cites previous court precedents that emphasize the public’s right to monitor the accuracy and maintenance of voter rolls.
The PILF requested a copy of Hawaii’s statewide voter roll in April 2023, but the officials denied the request, citing a state law that restricts access to the voter roll unless it is for election-related or governmental purposes.
J. Christian Adams expressed confidence in PILF’s lawsuit, stating that they have never lost a similar case. He suggested that if Hawaii does not have a statewide database, the Department of Justice may also take action.
PILF has previously succeeded in obtaining access to voter rolls in Illinois, Maryland, and Maine. However, their victory in Maine is currently being appealed by Secretary of State Shenna Bellows.
The Public Interest Legal Foundation uses open records laws to analyze the programs and activities of election officials, ensuring the accuracy and currency of voter rolls. They disseminate reports and information to educate the public about election integrity.
The lawsuit against Hawaii’s chief elections officer, Scott Nago, comes after he prevailed in a previous case where the Hawaii Republican Party accused his office of violating election laws during the post-election ballot auditing process. The lawsuit claimed that election officials relied on digitized images of ballots instead of the mandated paper ballots. However, the court dismissed the complaint due to a lack of evidence.
The Epoch Times has reached out to Scott Nago’s office for comment on the new lawsuit.
What potential implications could the outcome of this lawsuit have for other states withholding voter records
Ng-foreigners-voted-4249340?ea_src=author_manual&ea_med=related_stories”>
According to the lawsuit, PILF requested Hawaii’s voter registration records under the NVRA in August 2021 but was denied access by the Hawaii Office of Elections. The group claims that this denial violates federal law, which requires states to make voter registration information publicly available.
The NVRA, also known as the Motor Voter Act, was passed by Congress in 1993 with the aim of increasing voter registration across the country. It mandates that states maintain accurate and current voter registration rolls and provide public access to those records. By refusing to release voter records, Hawaii is allegedly hindering the transparency and openness of its election processes.
PILF argues that without access to voter records, it is impossible to verify the accuracy and legitimacy of the voting system. In the absence of transparency, there is a greater risk of voter fraud and other irregularities going undetected. The group asserts that Hawaii’s refusal to comply with federal law erodes public confidence in the electoral process.
The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring Hawaii to release the requested voter registration records and comply with the NVRA. PILF also asks for attorneys’ fees and costs associated with the legal action.
This is not the first time that PILF has taken legal action to protect election integrity. The organization has previously filed lawsuits in other states, such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina, to ensure compliance with voter record access laws. PILF’s efforts in these states have resulted in the release of information exposing instances of ineligible voters and potential voter fraud.
In recent years, concerns about election integrity have become more prominent across the United States. Various groups and individuals have raised questions about the accuracy and security of the voting process, leading to calls for increased transparency and verification measures. Lawsuits, like the one filed by PILF against Hawaii, aim to address these concerns and hold states accountable for their election practices.
The outcome of this lawsuit will likely have implications not only for Hawaii but also for other states that may be withholding voter records. It could set a precedent for ensuring transparency and accountability in future elections by establishing the importance of public access to voter rolls. Ultimately, the goal is to maintain the integrity of the democratic process and ensure that every citizen’s vote is properly counted and protected.
Conclusion
The Public Interest Legal Foundation has filed a lawsuit against Hawaii, accusing the state of violating the NVRA by refusing to release voter records. The group argues that this denial hampers transparency and puts the integrity of Hawaii’s elections at risk. By seeking legal action, PILF aims to protect the accuracy and legitimacy of the voting system by ensuring compliance with federal law. The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for election practices in Hawaii and potentially other states as well.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...