oann

Trump’s lawyers seek dismissal of D.C. case, citing presidential immunity.


(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

OAN’s Daniel Baldwin
12:22 PM – Thursday, October 5, 2023

Former President Donald Trump’s ‍legal team has⁣ filed a motion‍ to dismiss his Washington, D.C. case, arguing that he should be ⁣immune from prosecution ⁢due to his status as president.

Advertisement

Specifically, John⁢ Lauro, counsel for‌ Trump, argues that the Supreme Court decision in Nixon v.⁤ Fitzgerald provides the basis for‌ Trump’s claim ‌of⁣ presidential immunity.

“In view of the special nature of the⁣ President’s constitutional​ office and functions,” a current or former President has⁢ “absolute Presidential immunity from [civil] damages liability ‌for acts within the ‘outer⁣ perimeter’ of ‍his official responsibility,” Lauro writes ​in the filing, citing ⁢the‌ old SCOTUS ruling.

The Supreme Court ​ruled in Nixon⁣ v.⁤ Fitzgerald that‌ the ‌president “is entitled to absolute‌ immunity from damages ‍liability predicated on his official acts.” Lauro notes that “no court”​ has determined whether this immunity includes criminal ⁢prosecution, ​but ⁤he ⁣argues that the reasoning from this decision ought to​ apply to ‍Trump‍ in this case.

“Although Fitzgerald ⁣concerned civil liability, the exact same, if not ⁣more elevated, concerns apply ⁢to potential criminal​ prosecutions, mandating the same ‍absolute immunity,” wrote Lauro. ⁣“Vertical ​and horizontal ‌separation of powers ⁤simply cannot permit local, state, or subsequent federal ‌officials to constrain​ the President’s exercise of executive judgment through threats of ⁢criminal prosecution. To hold otherwise​ would‍ be to⁢ allow the ⁣President’s political opponents to usurp his or her constitutional role, fundamentally impairing our system ⁢of government. For​ this very reason,​ Fitzgerald recognized that ⁢Presidential immunity is⁤ not ‍just a creature of common law but also ‘rooted in the separation of powers under the Constitution.’”

Trump’s legal team also ​claims‌ that presidential immunity is rooted ‍in the ‍Impeachment Clauses of the U.S. ​Constitution.

“The ⁣Impeachment ​Clauses‍ provide that‍ the President⁣ may be ​charged by indictment only in cases ⁢where the⁢ President has⁢ been impeached and convicted ​by trial in the Senate,” Lauro wrote. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the‌ same course ⁣of conduct.”

Lauro goes on to argue that ​since the Senate acquitted Trump of charges in his second ⁢impeachment, ‌he cannot be criminally prosecuted for official acts. He claims this is implied since the ⁣Constitution only explicitly states⁢ that ​the⁣ “Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and ⁣subject to Indictment,‌ Trial, Judgment and‌ Punishment, according to Law.”

Lauro also notes ⁤that the country has seen ‌234 years of “unbroken historical practice” of not criminally prosecuting a​ president.

“A strong historical ‍practice of not exercising a supposed power—especially when there has been ⁢ample incentive and opportunity to do so—undercuts the sudden discovery of the newly⁤ minted power,” Lauro said.

Trump is facing‍ charges regarding his attempt⁢ to challenge the 2020 election. Judge Tanya Chutkan has scheduled a trial date of March ‍4,⁤ 2024 – one day before Super Tuesday in the Republican primary.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox ⁣for free. ⁢Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Advertisement

A new survey reveals that a majority ⁤of Democrats believe in restricting freedom ‌of speech,⁢ while Republicans aim to ‍protect the First⁤ Amendment.

In‌ an​ exclusive interview, Montana Congressman Matt Rosendale, ​one of the ⁤eight who voted out Kevin ⁤McCarthy as speaker, suggests ‌that several of⁢ his colleagues may also ⁣throw​ their names in the ring for the office.

One America’s Jessamyn Dodd and California congressional candidate Christine Bish discuss disability legislation and ⁣the Fentanyl crisis.

Congressman Matt Rosendale explains why he voted to oust speaker Kevin McCarthy. One America’s John⁢ Hines has⁢ more from Capitol Hill.

Meta is planning to lay off employees on⁢ Wednesday in the unit ‌of its metaverse-oriented Reality Labs division focused ⁤on creating ⁢custom silicon

Sam⁣ Bankman-Fried’s fraud trial‌ got under way with jury selection on Tuesday, ⁤nearly a year after his now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse.

The global cryptocurrency⁤ market remains badly scarred following the ⁤tumultuous collapse of crypto exchange FTX and other big players last year

A California federal judge has ruled that people who‌ own⁤ Tesla cars must pursue autopilot claims in individual arbitration rather than court.

rnrn

What is the legal precedent cited by ‌John Lauro to support Trump’s claim of presidential immunity?

Title: Trump’s Legal Team Files Motion to Dismiss Washington, ​D.C. Case on Basis of⁢ Presidential Immunity

Introduction:

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team has recently filed a motion to ‌dismiss his Washington, D.C. case, arguing that he should be granted ⁣immunity from prosecution due to his⁣ status as President. ​This article will explore the details of this motion, ‍including the legal basis ​and arguments put ‌forth⁤ by Trump’s legal counsel.

Background:

Donald Trump is‌ currently facing charges in relation to his attempts to⁤ challenge the 2020 election. The trial date has been scheduled for March 4, 2024, one day⁢ before Super Tuesday in the Republican primary. Trump’s legal team is​ seeking a dismissal of ⁢the case based on the concept of presidential immunity.

Presidential Immunity:

John Lauro, counsel‌ for Trump, argues⁤ that the basis ⁤for Trump’s claim of presidential immunity lies‌ in the Supreme Court decision ⁢in Nixon v. Fitzgerald. Lauro‌ contends that ‌”in ​view of the special nature of‌ the President’s constitutional office and functions,” a current or former President has “absolute Presidential immunity from damages liability for ⁤acts within the‍ ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.” This argument suggests ‌that‍ Trump should⁢ not be subject to civil damages or criminal prosecution for acts performed ⁢as⁢ President.

Extension to ⁣Criminal Prosecution:



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker