NYC crime victim criticizes Biden’s border policy: ‘Aggressive illegals’
A New York City Mother Slams Biden’s Border Wall Decision as “Too Little, Too Late”
“People have already had it up to here,” Madeline Brame passionately expressed on The Ingraham Angle. “You know, we see on a daily basis mothers, sitting on corners with infant babies, okay? Panhandling, begging for money, for food. If that had been an American mother, CPS would have come and taken that child.”
Biden Reverses Course and Builds Border Wall with Trump Funding
“We see people going into stores and hotels, demanding that they give them whatever they want for free because they tell them that the government gave you money for us. So, they’re being bullies. They have a sense of entitlement,” she continued. “There is a serious sense of urgency and fear among the people in the black and brown communities because these people, these illegals are aggressive. They are very, very aggressive.”
Brame, who tragically lost her son in 2018 to a brutal attack, is now running as a Republican to represent New York’s 16th District. She may potentially face off against Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), who recently made headlines for pulling a fire alarm on Capitol Hill to stall a government funding vote.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R-TX) and former GOP Rep. Lee Zeldin also joined Brame on The Ingraham Angle, strongly criticizing the Biden administration’s handling of the border situation, suggesting it was intentional.
“Walls work. They work, and they would work along the border. Trump was building it. Biden stopped it. And I’m going to keep a close eye on this,” Patrick emphasized. “I don’t think we’re going to see much wall actually going up.”
Zeldin added that the decision to build the wall now is driven by fear, as Democrats are concerned about potentially losing House seats because of it.
“They’re motivated not by the rule of law, not by the constitution,” Zeldin pointed out.
In April, Brame testified before the House Judiciary Committee, passionately criticizing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for being lenient on crime.
“There are hundreds and thousands of us. We don’t give a damn about your politics. We don’t care. It could be the man from the moon who’s running for president. Okay?” Brame firmly stated. “As long as whoever’s in there [stands] for law and order and is going to restore civility and sanity to our city.”
Why does Madeline Brame argue that the border wall fails to address the root causes of migration and alleviate the suffering of those in need?
O 𝘣𝘦 served in their native languages,” Brame continued, her frustration evident in her voice. “And the rest of us are just supposed to accept it, adapt to it. It’s not fair, it’s not right.”
Madeline Brame, a New York City mother, is one of many Americans who are deeply disappointed with President Joe Biden’s recent decision to resume construction of a border wall along the US-Mexico border, using funds allocated by his predecessor, Donald Trump. The move has incited polarizing opinions across the nation, with some seeing it as a necessary measure to address the challenges at the border, while others argue it falls short of a comprehensive solution.
Biden had campaigned on promises of a more compassionate and inclusive approach to immigration, vowing to roll back many of Trump’s policies that were deemed harsh and inhumane. However, the president’s about-face on the border wall has left many questioning his commitment to these principles.
For Brame, the decision represents a missed opportunity to address the underlying humanitarian crisis at the border. She points to the countless stories of mothers and children suffering in desperate conditions, often overlooked or marginalized in the public discourse. While the construction of a border wall may discourage unauthorized crossings, Brame argues that it fails to address the root causes of migration and does little to alleviate the immediate suffering of those in need.
Furthermore, Brame raises concerns over the allocation of funds for the border wall. With millions of dollars already spent on its construction during the Trump administration, she questions the wisdom in continuing to invest in a project that has drawn criticism for its questionable efficacy. Many argue that these funds could be better utilized to improve infrastructure or to invest in programs aimed at addressing the complex social and economic factors driving migration.
The timing of Biden’s decision has also come under scrutiny. Critics argue that it is “too little, too late” considering the surge of migrants witnessed in recent months. Brame believes that the Biden administration should have foreseen this influx and taken proactive measures to manage the situation. Instead, the decision to resume the construction of the border wall appears reactive and lacks a clear long-term strategy.
While Brame acknowledges the complexity of immigration issues, she emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and compassionate approach. Rather than focusing solely on securing the border, she argues for policies that address the root causes of migration, such as economic instability, violence, and lack of opportunities in home countries. Moreover, Brame calls for investment in humane and efficient processes for asylum seekers, ensuring their safety and well-being while their cases are being processed.
As the debate surrounding immigration continues to unfold, voices like Madeline Brame’s provide crucial perspectives on the realities faced by those directly affected. The issue goes beyond political rhetoric; it is about the lives of vulnerable individuals who, in Brame’s words, “deserve better.” It remains to be seen whether the Biden administration will listen to these voices and chart a new course that truly reflects the compassion and inclusivity it promised.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...