Conservative News Daily

Judge intervenes to save Trump’s companies, but fraud trial continues.

Good News and Bad‍ News for Trump: Judge Saves Companies, But Fraud Trial Continues

In a pair of decisions from an appellate judge in New York, ​former President Donald Trump and his legal team received both good news and⁣ bad news on Friday.

New York appeals court Associate Justice​ Peter Moulton issued a temporary ​stay that halted the breakup⁢ of a number of Trump-owned businesses, but ⁤refused to throw out the fraud trial ‍that had brought that decision about in the first place.

This⁣ temporary stay, however, will only prevent the dissolution of much of Trump’s business empire for a maximum of⁤ one month.

Trump’s legal team argued that breaking up​ the businesses should be postponed because if Trump were to win ⁢an appeal against Judge Arthur Engoron’s ⁢decision, it would be too late to reverse the actions ⁢taken.

Trump’s team hopes to see at least some parts of ​Engoron’s ruling reversed on appeal.

They also‌ hope that some or even most of⁤ New York Attorney General Letitia James’ case against Trump ​could be dismissed due to an appeals court ‌ruling from June that suggests many of her accusations were filed after the statute⁢ of limitations had expired.

One of Trump’s attorneys, Christoper Kise, passionately argued ‍that taking action against the companies before the final decisions ⁣are made could harm over 1,000 current employees.

“Engoron had ordered Trump to propose ‌potential receivers‌ by October 26, which ‌would begin the process of dissolution,” CNN reported.

“[Engoron] clearly does ⁤not comprehend the scope of⁣ the chaos its decision has wrought,” Trump’s legal team ​argued‍ in a court filing before Moulton’s decision.

Some of the private⁤ homes occupied by ‍Trump and other defendants are actually owned‌ by limited liability corporations that could be ⁢affected by Engoron’s ruling,⁤ putting them at risk of being sold.

Trump’s team had also tried to delay the trial overall, but Moulton declined ⁤to intervene on that ⁢count.

The plaintiffs claimed that Trump’s attorneys had been unable “to point to any purported irreparable harm from proceeding with a trial that has ⁣already begun.” Apparently, Moulton agreed.

James’ team argued that delays in this trial could‌ cause conflicts with other pending cases‌ against Trump, making scheduling problematic.

“If the trial here is⁤ delayed at all, there is a significant risk that defendants will request further delays of trial​ based on the deadlines in these⁤ other ⁣cases. Indeed, defendants already appear to be attempting to play one court against the other,” the motion read.

They also ⁣claimed that they had offered to enter into an agreement with Trump’s legal team to delay enforcement of the order canceling the business certificates for many of Trump’s businesses, but that Trump’s team had ‌refused to discuss it with them.

Another factor against any trial delay, James’ team argued, were all the special arrangements the court had to‌ make ‍due to the high⁣ profile of the ⁤proceedings.

The attorney general’s office noted “special security‍ arrangements outside and inside the​ courthouse, many additional security⁣ and ​other court personnel to conduct those security arrangements, and special arrangements to ⁢ensure access for the press and public,” among the accommodations the court⁤ had ⁢already made.

Source: Judge Swoops in Last Second ‍to Save Trump’s Companies, But Doesn’t Stop Fraud ⁣Trial

What potential consequences did​ the argument emphasize in relation to breaking‍ up the businesses?

Stated in their argument. They emphasized the potential consequences of breaking up the‌ businesses, including the loss of jobs and ⁣disruption to‍ the ​employees.

While the temporary stay ‍provides some relief for Trump, the fraud trial against ⁣him will​ still continue. This trial is a result‍ of the investigation led by New York Attorney General Letitia James into Trump’s business practices.

Trump’s legal team​ remains hopeful that they can reverse some of the rulings ‌made by Judge ⁤Engoron through the appeals process. ‍They particularly aim to challenge the accusations made by James, as they believe that some of the claims were ‍filed after the statute of ‌limitations had expired.

In their argument,⁢ Trump’s attorney ⁤Christopher Kise passionately defended the need to postpone any actions ‍against the businesses until the‌ final decisions ​are ⁣made. He acknowledged the potential harm it could cause to the employees and highlighted⁣ the responsibility to prioritize their well-being.

Judge Moulton’s‍ temporary stay provides a brief period‌ of respite for Trump’s businesses, but it ⁤is important to note‍ that this stay will only ⁢last for a maximum of one month. This means that Trump’s legal team ⁤will need to act swiftly to present their appeals and arguments to⁢ the appellate ​court.

The ongoing ⁤fraud trial ⁤against Trump continues to generate significant public interest and attention.⁢ The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching⁢ implications ⁤for Trump’s‍ business empire and his political future.

Overall, the ⁣decisions made by Judge Moulton ‌provide both good news and bad news for Trump. While the ⁤temporary stay temporarily saves⁢ Trump’s businesses from dissolution, it does not dismiss the fraud trial‍ against him. ⁣Trump’s legal ‌team will continue to fight⁤ for ‌a favorable outcome through the appeals process,⁤ aiming to reverse the‌ decisions⁤ made by ​Judge⁤ Engoron and ​potentially dismiss some of the ⁤accusations made by Attorney General Letitia James. The coming‌ weeks will ‌be crucial in‌ determining the future of⁤ Trump’s businesses and his⁣ legal battles.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker