Great speech, Mr. President! It’s time for action against terrorism.
After the horrifying massacre of over a thousand Jews in Israel, including the brutal beheading of infants and the burning alive of elderly women, President Joe Biden delivered a powerful speech defending Israel and condemning the despicable antisemitism of Hamas as “pure, unadulterated evil.”
We should expect this kind of sentiment from any leader of a civilized nation after witnessing the most heinous act of violence against Jews since the Holocaust. And, truthfully, it was refreshing to hear such moral clarity, especially in contrast to the degeneracy of Hamas allies and the fellow travelers that plague the American left today.
Democrats who have spent years defending figures like Rashida Tlaib or Ben Rhodes or BLM or CAIR or anyone else are now feigning surprise that Soviet-style “anti-Zionists” are among them. These individuals are not fringe groups dressed as Nazis in front of Disney World. They are celebrated, educated, and deeply entrenched in left-wing intellectual circles, major universities, bureaucracies, Congress, and establishment publications, as well as cable news channels.
While some on the center-left have spoken out, most leaders have remained silent. I’m not advocating for censorship, but if you’re too afraid to condemn these people now, when will you?
So, Biden’s speech was commendable. But what actions will Democrats take? It is likely that the United States is providing Israel with intelligence assistance. We may demonstrate military strength. Hopefully, we will offer diplomatic support instead of engaging in the Obama-era maneuvers that treated the Jewish State as a mere acquaintance. All of that is also appreciated.
However, when will the administration revoke the $6 billion waiver it granted to the Iranian mullahs, who have spent decades murdering and kidnapping American citizens, while fueling wars against our Middle Eastern allies? It is inconceivable that Hamas could carry out an attack of this magnitude without the logistical and financial support of Iran. The Biden administration has allowed approximately $40 billion in waivers to flow to Iran in recent years, not just six. Some of this may have been to maintain global supplies and domestic prices (although we could certainly drill here instead). Sanctions exist to pressure regimes into adopting normal behavior. Will this change, or will Biden continue the pernicious Obama-style appeasement of the terrorist regime?
What will Biden do about Qatar, where Hamas leaders are free to celebrate the murder of Jews and Americans while enjoying luxurious hotel rooms in Doha? The Department of Justice has designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. Qatar is supposedly an ally. There is no reason why we should not be able to extradite the masterminds behind violence against American citizens.
What is Joe Biden doing about the hundreds of millions of U.S. tax dollars that continue to be sent to Palestinian governments every year as direct aid and through the United Nations? Are we funding groups that divert funds to carry out terror attacks and provide stipends to the families of those who murder Jewish civilians? Should we be supporting regimes that promote and perpetuate hatred and violence (across generations)?
Just a few months ago, Fatah was in discussions to form a unity government with Hamas, the same organization that executed 260 young people at a music festival. (Although, to be fair, Hamas would probably receive majority support from the Congressional Progressive Caucus or the Harvard student body as well.) Elections have not been held in the “West Bank” for over a decade because Hamas or similarly extremist parties would likely win. The only group that can make Fatah appear moderate is Hamas. Does this sound like a place deserving of U.S. aid, moral support, or even statehood?
The president has expressed all the right sentiments, and we appreciate that. However, his administration has yet to take many of the necessary actions.
rnrn
The room and question whether the United States should continue providing financial aid to countries or organizations that support or engage in antisemitic activities?
The recent massacre of over a thousand Jews in Israel has brought international attention to the issue of antisemitism and the role of terrorist organizations like Hamas. In the face of this horrific act of violence, President Joe Biden delivered a powerful speech condemning the antisemitism of Hamas as “pure, unadulterated evil.” This kind of sentiment is what we should expect from any leader of a civilized nation, especially after witnessing such a heinous act of violence against Jews since the Holocaust.
It was refreshing to hear such moral clarity from President Biden, especially when contrasted with the degeneracy of Hamas allies and fellow travelers that plague the American left today. Democrats who have spent years defending figures like Rashida Tlaib or Ben Rhodes or supporting movements like BLM or CAIR are now feigning surprise that Soviet-style “anti-Zionists” are among them. These individuals are not fringe groups dressed as Nazis; they are celebrated, educated, and deeply entrenched in left-wing intellectual circles, major universities, bureaucracies, Congress, and establishment publications, as well as cable news channels.
While some on the center-left have spoken out against antisemitism, most leaders have remained silent. It is essential not to advocate for censorship, but it raises the question of when will these leaders condemn these people if they are too afraid to do so now.
President Biden’s speech was commendable, but actions need to follow words. It is likely that the United States is providing Israel with intelligence assistance and may demonstrate military strength. Diplomatic support is also crucial instead of engaging in the Obama-era maneuvers that treated the Jewish State as a mere acquaintance. All of these actions are appreciated.
However, it is essential to address the elephant in
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...