The ‘Ocean Rights’ movement empowers global elites to stop development: Marc Morano.
The movement to grant legal rights to waterbodies such as rivers and oceans would end up concentrating power to a small group of globalist elites in the name of protecting the environment, said author and climate change skeptic Marc Morano.
“We are seeing human rights being degraded, particularly since COVID,” Mr. Morano said in an interview on EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program. “At the same time, this whole movement now is pushing for ocean rights, which is basically saying the oceans are going to attain a certain level of personhood.”
Ocean rights activists recently renewed their advocacy at the United Nations General Assembly.
During the Ocean Race Summit held in September at the U.N. headquarters in New York, they called on the international organization to adopt a Universal Declaration of Ocean Rights, a framework focusing on aligning human activities with the idea that oceans are living beings, not a resource.Specifically, such a declaration from the U.N. would acknowledge that the ocean has its own inherent rights, such as those to life, ecological integrity, freedom from irreversible pollution, and the right to continue its natural cycles.
It also means that there would be an international body overseeing matters related to maritime management, and that the ocean would be given a seat at the table.
“We acknowledge the Ocean’s right to representation and to have a voice within a multinational governance system, which requires further establishing mechanisms to facilitate and ensure all stakeholder interests are properly represented,” read the document ocean rights activists submitted to the U.N. General Assembly.
“They literally want a lawyer to represent the rights of [the ocean] against human activities,” Mr. Morano said.
“In the case of the oceans, you’re going to have, essentially, a much harder time doing anything that benefits humans, i.e., fishing, boating,” he continued. “Any activities in the ocean will now be evaluated based on the, essentially, inherent rights of the ocean—not on whether, you know, it’s going to harm human populations, not on whether it makes sense to do, whether it can benefit humans. It’s all going to be on what left-wing progressive Marxist activists, essentially, are going to claim the ocean feels, believes.”Giving Up National Sovereignty
The ocean rights movement is relatively new, but the quasi-religious idea that the nonhuman parts of the Earth’s ecological system have inherent legal rights and deserve legal representation has been around among environmental activists for a while.
Mr. Morano said environmental activists promote the “defense of the rights of Mother Earth to ‘ensure harmony between humanity and nature,'” referring to an agenda adopted in 2011 by a working group of the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. “Ultimately, this is them saying, ‘We’re going to grant personhood to trees, to certain animal species, to bodies of water.'”
Recognizing that nature has its own entitlements would open courtroom doors to environmentalist attorneys on behalf of their plant, animal, and water clients, according to Mr. Morano. In fact, progressive legal groups such as the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund have been drafting and promoting “nature rights” laws that could be used as a legal weapon to shut down the development of natural resources.But the problem doesn’t end there, Mr. Morano argued. “It’s about national sovereignty,” he said.
“These activists are going to be tapped in by billionaires and multimillionaires to all these international organizations that want to shut down our modern development, and they want to be in control of every decision,” Mr. Morano explained. “They’re going to appoint people with that ideology in charge of every industry. This would include development from transportation to agriculture to shipping, economic development.”
Mr. Morano said these entities will not likely ban these activities outright, but the power to make decisions will become concentrated to a few people at the top of the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization.
“No longer will it matter if your local legislative body wants to do something,” he said. “It’s not going to matter. You’re going to be violating the international Earth rights of a river, a lake, a tree, or some animal species.”
How do skeptics like Marc Morano argue that granting legal rights to waterbodies could concentrate power in the hands of a small group of globalist elites and undermine human rights and national sovereignty?
Lists for some time.
Advocates argue that granting legal rights to waterbodies, such as rivers and oceans, is necessary to protect the environment and address pressing issues such as pollution, overfishing, and climate change. They believe that by recognizing the rights of nature, human activities can be regulated and controlled to ensure the long-term well-being of the planet.
However, critics like Marc Morano see this movement as a dangerous step towards concentrating power in the hands of a small group of globalist elites. According to Morano, the push for ocean rights is part of a broader agenda to degrade human rights, with the COVID pandemic serving as a convenient pretext for expanding governmental control.
In an interview on EpochTV’s ”Crossroads” program, Morano expressed his concerns about the implications of granting personhood to oceans. He argued that this would hinder human activities such as fishing and boating, as all actions in the ocean would be evaluated based on the perceived rights of the ocean itself.
Morano emphasized that this approach disregards the well-being and interests of human populations, as decisions would be based on what left-wing progressive activists claim the ocean feels and believes. This, in turn, would undermine the principle of national sovereignty and place decision-making power in the hands of an international body overseeing maritime management.
During the Ocean Race Summit held at the U.N. headquarters in New York, ocean rights activists called on the United Nations to adopt a Universal Declaration of Ocean Rights. This declaration would acknowledge the inherent rights of the ocean, including its right to life, ecological integrity, and freedom from irreversible pollution.
The activists argue that the ocean should have representation and a voice within a multinational governance system. They envision a lawyer representing the rights of the ocean against human activities, further entrenching the influence of non-human entities in global decision-making processes.
While the proponents of ocean rights present their cause as a noble quest for environmental protection, skeptics like Morano warn of the potential consequences. Granting legal rights to waterbodies in this manner may lead to unintended consequences, concentrating power in the hands of a select few and diminishing the ability of human societies to make decisions that benefit their own well-being.
Ultimately, the debate over granting legal rights to waterbodies raises significant questions about the balance between protecting the environment and safeguarding human rights and national sovereignty. As this movement gains traction, it is essential to critically examine its implications and ensure that decisions are made with the best interests of both humans and nature in mind.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...