Saudi Prince reportedly made Biden’s Secretary of State wait for hours before postponing their meeting.

Missed Meeting with Saudi Prince Raises Questions about⁣ U.S.-Arab Relations

When someone misses a⁣ scheduled‌ meeting, Americans tend to take it in⁢ stride, but cultural norms in the⁢ Arab world emphasize a‌ higher level of respect and adherence to specific ‍etiquette.

For example, checking one’s watch during a conversation‌ in ⁢a social setting is considered​ impolite, as is positioning one’s shoe towards another​ person⁢ or crossing one’s legs when facing them.

Punctuality is particularly valued in a professional context, according to Cultural Atlas.

So what does it‍ say that Saudi Prince Mohamed bin Salman stood​ up U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken after‌ keeping‌ him waiting for hours⁣ for a meeting?

Blinken was scheduled to meet the‍ crown prince in Riyadh on​ Saturday evening, ‌according to The Washington Post, but Salman didn’t show, a snub that may go deeper⁤ than Westerners can perceive.⁤ The prince⁣ eventually met Blinken on ‍Sunday, but, unsurprisingly, the conversation didn’t go as Blinken may have wanted it ‌to.

During the eventual​ meeting,⁢ Prince Salman criticized Israel’s actions, calling for a cessation of military activities and ​an end to the “siege of Gaza.”

His statements​ are in⁢ sharp⁣ contrast to President Joe Biden’s statements, which promised to stand with Israel and “make sure that Israel‌ does ⁣not run out of these critical assets to ​defend its cities and its​ citizens.”

Blinken faced similar opposition in Egypt,‍ where President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi criticized Israel’s ⁤actions, asserting they had gone beyond the “right of self-defense” and that it amounted ‌to “collective punishment.”

While it cannot be considered unexpected that Arab states would side with Arab sentiments over Jewish ones, the remarkable thing about the⁢ Trump administration was that somehow, he managed to broker peace between the Jews and⁣ Arabs.

The historic Abraham Accords, which codified the normalization‍ of relations between Israel, the United⁢ Arab Emiritz and Bahrain, marked ⁢the ” dawn of a new Middle East,” in⁣ Trump’s words, and opened the door for other countries to normalize relations with the Jewish state, which would have led to transformation in⁤ the area, according⁤ to The New York Post.

A recap of⁣ the peace ⁣process​ efforts published ⁢by Time reveals an interesting point perhaps unintended by the writers of the piece.

The​ article points out that the second intifada ⁣took place in the year 2000 after a Camp David summit between former President‍ Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime⁣ Minister Ehud Barak, and PA Chairman Yasser Arafat, intended to negotiate a settlement, ‍destroying any prospect of normalization of relations‍ in the region at that time.

When the Biden administration aimed to extend these accords by involving Saudi Arabia, violence resumed, echoing a previous historical pattern in hyperdrive, according to the Associated Press.

During the Trump administration, aid to Palestinian authorities was also reduced, according to ‍The New York⁢ Post, without any‌ large-scale retaliation against Israel.

Could it be possible that Trump’s peace through strength policies enabled the administration to achieve success in normalizing relations where ⁤other administrations, especially the‍ current one, have ⁣failed?

Is there a perception in ⁤the Middle‍ East ‍that the United States, Israel’s‌ greatest ⁣ally, is growing weaker, influencing the timing of these attacks?

Words are only “violence” until you start to ⁤see the ​results of true violence.

Mean tweets are starting to sound really good right about now.


A Note from Our Staff:

Did you know that 90 percent of advertisers will​ have nothing to do‌ with The Western Journal? The liberal elites have put us on one of their⁤ financial⁤ kill ‍lists.

They did it because we’ve told the truth‍ and ‌spoken out against ​them for ‌over a decade. And since they couldn’t shut us up,‍ now, they’re trying to starve us out.

We’re turning to you ⁣because,‍ frankly, we have to have your help. It might not sound like much, but just one subscription to The Western Journal can make a real difference.

We don’t have a huge staff, big salaries,⁣ or ‌deep donor pockets. We’re family-owned ⁢and independent.‍ But because we’re independent from the elites, we have to⁤ rely on‍ readers like you.

Can we count on‍ you for just a single subscription? The⁢ cost of a month-long subscription is⁤ less ​than a single cup of Starbucks coffee. And, unlike with Starbucks, you​ can⁤ be ​100 percent certain that every penny ​we spend goes toward fighting for traditional American values and ​against​ liberal elites.

Please help us continue exposing the truth. Please subscribe today.

Thank ​you for reading The Western Journal!

The post Saudi Prince Makes Biden’s Secretary‌ of​ State Wait for Hours, Then Postpones Meeting: Report ⁢appeared first on‌ The ⁢Western Journal.

We⁤ don’t have any other options. We rely on the support of readers like you to continue providing ⁤independent and unbiased news coverage.

If you value‍ the work we do ⁤and believe in a ‌free and transparent press, please consider making a ​donation to help​ us keep going. Every contribution, ⁢no matter how small,⁢ makes ​a difference.

Thank you for ‍your support.

1. How ‌does ​relying⁣ on reader support contribute to independent and unbiased news coverage?

Relying on ​reader support allows news organizations to prioritize their readers’ interests and⁢ preferences, ‍rather than ‍being dependent on advertisers ​or‍ corporate sponsors. This⁣ financial independence helps ​in ensuring unbiased ⁤reporting, as news organizations are not influenced by external pressures or⁤ agendas. ‌By directly receiving funding from readers,‌ news outlets can maintain editorial autonomy⁢ and deliver ‍news coverage that is driven by public interest rather than commercial interests.‌ This ​can lead to a more diverse range of perspectives ⁣and a greater focus on ⁣important issues that may⁤ be overlooked by mainstream media. Additionally, reader-supported news⁤ outlets often have a ⁣stronger connection with their audience, fostering transparency ⁢and accountability, as they are directly answerable to their readers. This relationship builds trust and further enhances the credibility⁤ of​ independent news coverage.

3. How do small ​contributions from readers help in keeping the news ⁤organization going?

⁤ Small contributions from​ readers can play a crucial role⁤ in⁤ keeping a news organization ⁢going in several ways:

1. Financial Support: Small contributions, when‍ combined, can‍ add up to a significant amount of money, especially if there is a dedicated community of readers supporting ⁤the organization. These contributions⁢ can help cover various costs⁢ such as​ salaries, content production, research, and technology expenses.

2. Diversifying Revenue Streams: In an era where traditional ​advertising revenue is declining, small contributions provide an alternative and more ‍sustainable source⁣ of​ income. By diversifying revenue streams, news organizations become less dependent on a single source of ⁢funding, making them more resilient and able to navigate changes in the media landscape.

3. Community Engagement: Accepting contributions from readers fosters a sense of ownership and community engagement. When readers feel invested in a news organization, they are more likely to ​support its sustainability.⁢ Small contributions can create a reciprocal relationship between readers and the news organization, enhancing loyalty ⁢and trust.

4. Independence and Editorial Freedom: ⁢Relying heavily on advertising or large donations‌ can potentially compromise a news ​organization’s independence ⁣and editorial freedom. By encouraging⁣ small contributions from readers, news organizations can maintain‌ a certain ‍level of independence and autonomy, enabling them ⁢to report on critical issues without⁢ undue influence from⁤ external sources.

5. Nurturing Innovation: Small contributions often come from dedicated readers who have a⁣ vested interest in supporting quality journalism. This allows news organizations to experiment, innovate, and explore new ways of storytelling, distribution, and engagement. These contributions can fund initiatives such as⁣ investigative reporting, multimedia storytelling, or the development ⁢of new digital platforms.

Overall, small contributions ⁢from readers provide ⁤the necessary financial ⁣support, community engagement, and independence needed to sustain and evolve⁤ news organizations in the face of changing media environments.

2. What role do donations play in ⁤sustaining a free​ and transparent ‍press?

‌ Donations play a crucial role in sustaining a free and transparent press ⁤by providing financial‌ support for news ⁢organizations and journalists.‍ Here are​ a few ‌ways donations contribute to the ​sustainability of a free press:

1. Independence‍ and autonomy: Donations allow media organizations to maintain their independence from political and commercial influence. By relying on donations from the public, journalists can report without fear of retribution or censorship, ‌ensuring transparency and accountability.

2.‍ Funding investigative journalism: Investigative⁣ journalism often requires ⁢significant resources, including time, manpower, and legal support. Donations provide the necessary financial‌ backing for journalists to pursue ‌in-depth ⁢investigations into corruption, wrongdoing, and abuse‍ of power.

3.⁣ Supporting diverse and minority voices: Donations can‍ be directed towards news organizations that prioritize representing diverse communities and ⁤marginalized voices. This funding allows journalists from underrepresented backgrounds to report on⁤ issues that mainstream media might ignore, fostering a⁢ more inclusive and comprehensive news landscape.

4. ‍Access ​to information: Donations can contribute to the development ​and ‌maintenance of online platforms⁣ and technologies that facilitate access to news and information. This ensures that citizens, regardless of their financial means, ‍can engage with a free press and stay ​informed.

5. Training and⁤ development: Donations can be used to support training programs and workshops for journalists,​ helping to improve their⁣ skills and knowledge. This investment‍ in professional development enhances the quality of reporting and‌ strengthens the ability⁢ of journalists to hold power to account.

Overall,‌ donations provide the necessary ​financial resources for​ news organizations ​and journalists​ to⁣ fulfill their crucial role in a ⁣democratic society. They⁤ enable the press to serve as a watchdog, uncover misconduct,⁤ inform citizens, and foster public discourse, all essential elements for upholding a free and transparent press.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker